Differing Versions of the ‘Local’: Implications for the Reform of Upper Secondary Education and Lifelong Learning
Author(s):
Conference:
ECER 2010
Format:
Paper

Session Information

23 SES 01 B, Interpreting and Enacting Reform Locally

Paper Session

Time:
2010-08-25
09:15-10:45
Room:
M.B. SALI 6, Päärakennus / Main Building
Chair:
Linda Rönnberg

Contribution

The role and nature of local governance in public services is being deliberated within different national systems in Europe (e.g. Newman 2005). Within the UK, debates about democracy and the local delivery of services, now known as the ‘New Localism’ (Pratchett 2004), have grown in response to the dysfunctions and political unpopularity of a top-down managerialist approach. Research, however, suggests that different versions of the ‘Local’ are being proposed by the current UK Labour Government, the main opposition Conservative Party and research and practitioner communities. Furthermore, the devolved governments of Scotland and Wales are developing distinctive systems of governance of public services and of education in particular (see ttp://www.tlrp.org/themes/NewDirections). This paper focuses on different versions of the Local and their implications for the governance and reform of upper secondary education and lifelong learning across three different countries of the UK. The paper will ask the following questions: 1. What are the key policies on governance and the delivery of learning at the local level proposed by the Labour Government, the main Opposition Party and the devolved governments of Scotland and Wales? 2. What issues and debates have researcher and practitioner communities raised in relation to these policy positions? 3. To what extent do these policies and debates constitute different versions of the Local and how can they be understood in terms of their relationship to three key dimensions of governance - managerialism, marketisation and democratization (Newman 2001, Avis 2009)? 4. What are the implications of these different approaches for policy-making in upper secondary education and lifelong learning in the UK and beyond? The theoretical framework will comprise the three conceptual dimensions in Q3, together with the further development of new concepts of governance and localism – ‘devolved social partnership’ (Coffield et al. 2008) and ‘local learning ecologies’ (Hodgson and Spours 2009).

Method

The paper draws on theoretical and empirical evidence from two UK Economic and Social Research Council research projects, The Impact of Policy on Learning and Inclusion in the New Learning and Skills Sector, and New Directions in Learning and Skills in England, Scotland and Wales. Both projects have brought together perspectives from policy-makers, practitioners and researchers. The paper also analyses evidence from a range of recent policy documents from the main UK political parties and synthesises relevant research literatures from both local government and education and training.

Expected Outcomes

It is anticipated that the paper will contribute to the public policy debate within the UK and more broadly across Europe about the role of the Local in national education systems. It will also build on outcomes from the Independent Inquiry into Lifelong Learning in the UK (Schuller and Watson 2009) by further developing a theoretical understanding of policy options regarding the devolution of power between the national, regional, local and micro-local levels and the relationship between these and top-down managerialism.

References

Avis, J. (2009) Further education in England: the new localism, systems theory and governance Journal of Education Policy, 24 (5) 633–648 Coffield, F., Edward, S., Finlay, I., Hodgson, A., Steer, R. and Spours, K. (2008) Improving learning, skills and inclusion: the impact of policy. London: Routledge/Falmer. Hodgson, A. and Spours, K. (2009) Collaborative Local Learning Ecologies: Reflections on the Governance of Lifelong Learning in England: IFLL Sector Paper 6, NIACE (http://shop.niace.org.uk/ifll-sector-paper-6.html) accessed 2 December 2009 Newman, J. (2001) Modernising Governance: New Labour, Policy and Society, London: Sage/OUP. Newman, J. (2005) Remaking Governance: Peoples, Politics and the Public Sphere. Bristol: Policy Press. Pratchett, L. (2004) ‘Local Autonomy, Local Democracy and the 'New Localism' Political Studies, 52 (2): 358-375. Schuller, T. and Watson, D. (2009) Learning Through Life: Inquiry into the Future for Lifelong Learning (IFLL). Leicester: NIACE

Author Information

Institute of Education, University of London
Continuing and Professional Education
London
§
Continuing and Professional Education
London

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.