“Not just a small cog in a big machine” - Teacher’s Discoursive Agency in an Ideological Education Journal
Author(s):
Conference:
ECER 2010
Format:
Paper

Session Information

23 SES 03 B, Teacher’s work, Training and Professionalism I

Paper Session

Time:
2010-08-25
14:00-15:30
Room:
M.B. SALI 6, Päärakennus / Main Building
Chair:
Eric Mangez

Contribution

This presentation discusses active citizenship from the point of view of teachers. I present some of the early findings of my ongoing dissertation research that goes under the working title “Teachers for Peace and Progress” – Sketching the Picture of an Ideological Teacher. The study typifies sociologically and historically oriented teacher research with main interest on teacher-society-relationship and teacher’s civic agency.

Data consists of texts in a Finnish journal Koulutyöntekijä (School Worker). This was an organ for of an ideological teachers’ association called Demokraattiset koulutyöntekijät ry i.e. Demko (Democratic School Workers Association, 1973-1989). Demko was a school political organization founded by progressive teachers who wanted to promote egalitarian school politics and improve teachers’ professional status. Politically Demko was independent but it was clearly left oriented. It took a firm stand against teachers’ official trade union OAJ which was considered conservative.

The main research question is what kind of societal agency is constructed possible for a teacher in an ideological organization paper. Demko is understood as representing nonconformist teacher image that emerged with the general social radicalization in the 1960's and 1970's. Thus, data is studied against the history of the Finnish teacherhood and against the context of school political and general political developments of the 1970’s and 1980’s.

Theoretically the study draws from two directions: on the one hand from German critical theory, on the other hand from Michel Foucault’s work. Understanding of school institution and the nature of ideal education is founded on Frankfurt School thinkers such as Theodor Adorno, Frankfurt School inspired critical pedagogy (e.g. Klaus Mollenhauer) and American critical pedagogy (Henry A. Giroux). Educational decisions, structures and everyday practices are perceived as deriving eventually from political decisions and ideological power struggles in a given society. School institution is seen as usually having an intermediary role in relation to the prevailing ideology. This cultural transmission task is carried out in schools without much problematization, which enables the real social and political motives of education to remain hidden.

Still, at the same time as the schools reproduce the larger society, they are seen to contain spaces to resist its dominating logic by creating democratic public spheres dedicated to forms of self and social empowerment. In these spaces teachers might play as transformative intellectuals developing counter hegemonic pedagogies that educate students for transformative action and help them to acquire the skills necessary to live in an authentic democracy. This ideal is, how ever, challenged not only by cultural and historical myths about teacher’s role but also by the institutional character of the work. The conflict between ideals of transformativity and the institutional, structural and normative boundaries guiding everyday professionals work is discussed with the help of Foucaultian concepts of power, governance, discourse, counter-discourse and agency.

Method

Methodologically this research takes social constructionist stance. In order to look at the construction of teacher-society relationship and teacher’s social agency in Koulutyöntekijä journal, analysis draws both from Foucault-inspired power-sensitive discourse analysis and Greimasian sociosemiotics. Data (mainly editorials and other “line texts” from 1973 to 1989) is studied as forming a counter-discoursive space that gives room to the kind of teacher images, narratives and meaning makings that were, and still are, marginalized and silenced in the Finnish mainstream publicity and educational discourse. To tackle the question of teacher agency, data is analysed with the help of A. J. Greimas’s theory. An actantial grid model is used to perceive interdependent actants (subject, object, helper, opponent, sender and receiver) within the Demko discourse. Analysis reveals the link-up between teacher and other school political actors. Actantial structure is then further analysed by perceiving different types of modalities i.e. values motivating actants’ actions.

Expected Outcomes

Data analysis reveals the existence of a quite monolithic “Demko discourse”. This mode of speaking is perceived as a “pending” narrative that has persuasive function in regard to the readers. Within Demko discourse teacher is constructed as an active, aware, critical and bold social agent that is willing and capable of being a school political actor to be reckoned with. The subject of the Demko narrative is not an individual teacher but a collective: a group of “progressive democratic teachers”. Demko’s missions seem to cross class room and school context, even national school political context, and widen to global issues. Promoted educational values draw from working-class ideology, humanism and pacifism and lean on international treaties like United Nation’s Declaration of Human Rights. How ever, by the end of the 1980’s discourse changes. From a collective subject there is transition to individualism, from leaning to universal ideological answers to looking for answers from sociological theories, and from self-confidence and faith to doubt and unsureness. Research findings are finally reflected upon current discussions about educators’ civic role and social agency in the Nordic context of neoliberal school politics.

References

Adorno, T. W. 1995 (1969). Kasvatus Auschwitzin jälkeen. Suom. Raija Sironen, Esa Sironen & Timo uusitupa. Teoksessa J. Koivisto, M. Mäki & T. Uusitupa (toim.) Mitä on valistus? Tampere, Vastapaino, 227–247. Foucault, M. 1990/1976. The history of sexuality. An introduction. London: Penguin Books. Foucault, M. 1977. Discipline and punish. The birth of the prison. London: Penguin Books. Giroux, H. A. 1989. Critical pedagogy, the state, and cultural struggle. Albany : State University of New York Press. Giroux, H. A. 1988. Teachers as intellectuals. Toward a critical pedagogy of learning. Westport: Bergin & Garvey. Giroux, H. A. 1983. Theory & resistance in education. A pedagogy for the opposition. London: Heinmann Educational Books Ltd. Räisänen, M. 2008. Transformatiivisuuden säikeitä opettajapuheessa. Diskurssianalyysi opettajan yhteiskuntasuhteen rakentumisesta Opettaja-lehdessä. Kasvatus (1), 6-19. Simola, H. 1995. Paljon vartijat. Suomalainen kansanopettaja valtiollisessa kouludiskurssissa 1860-luvulta 1990-luvulle. Helsingin yliopisto. Opettajankoulutuslaitos. Tutkimuksia 137.

Author Information

University of Tampere
Department of Teacher Education
Tampere

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.