This article seeks to offer a fresh perspective on the question of what notion of distributive justice should guide education. To offer this perspective, it examines the relationship between justice, society, and education through the lenses of systems theory and the study of complex adaptive systems. Using these theories, this article challenges the conventional understanding of the relationship between education and justice, which relies on fixed, universal ideals. Instead, the article re-conceptualizes the promotion of justice as a dynamic, context-sensitive process tailored to the evolving and fragmented nature of societal and educational systems. By doing so, it seeks to provide a more practical, adaptive, and nuanced approach to addressing and promoting justice in education that better aligns with the complexities and challenges of real-world conditions.

The article is structured as follows. The introduction and provides the background and outline of the article. The second section discusses what can be termed the standard view of education’s role in promoting justice because of its dominance and emphasizes its reliance on predetermined ideals. It focuses on conceptions that stem from Rawls, and the notion of ideal theory. It then applies systems theory to analyze and conceptualize the underlying logic of this standard view.

The third section challenges the standard view by advancing the idea that society comprises parallel, interacting systems. It applies the idea of the German sociologist Niklas Luhmann’s and the theories of the American philosopher Michael Walzer to argue for adopting multiple, context-dependent justice principles rather than a single ideal.

The fourth section draws on complexity theory to question the standard approach assumption that educational systems can and should reach a stable state. It explains that if we adopt a dynamic systems approach, it is essential that justice principles evolve continuously to avoid becoming irrelevant or counterproductive.

The sixth section begins to outline a new way forward. Based on the preceding discussion, it offers insights into the relationship between justice and education and sketches two possible alternatives to the standard approach that better address the dynamic nature of educational systems. The first approach stems from the discussions conducted earlier in the paper. The second approach, is more radical and is grounded in Sen’s conception of non ideal justice. The article ends with some concluding remarks.

The paper is a theoretical exploration and does not involve any new empirical research. The paper is examines normative questions and employs a conceptual framework rooted in systems theory and complexity theory to examine justice in education. Through theoretical synthesis and critical analysis, the paper aims to offer fresh insights into how justice can be advanced in education when it is understood as an interconnected and dynamic system.

The paper concludes that advancing justice in education requires moving beyond static, universal ideals often associated with conventional theories of justice. It argues that these traditional approaches fail to address the dynamic and fragmented nature of societal and educational systems. Instead, the paper proposes a pluralistic and context-sensitive framework for justice, informed by systems theory and complexity theory. This framework emphasizes that justice should not be seen as a fixed endpoint or ideal but as an evolving process that adapts to the unique conditions and challenges of different systems and contexts. In addition, the paper concludes that justice should not only respond to systemic demands but also act as a transformative force, capable of driving positive change and innovation within societal systems. It offers that by addressing injustices and fostering adaptation, justice can help education align more effectively with the evolving needs of society.

Brighouse, H. (2003). School choice and social justice: Oxford University Press, USA. Cilliers, P. (2016). Complexity, ethics and justice. In Critical Complexity (pp. 181-190): De Gruyter. Gaus, G. (2016). The tyranny of the ideal: Princeton University Press. Gilstrap, D. L. (2005). Strange attractors and human interaction: Leading complex organizations through the use of metaphors. Luhmann, N. (2013). Introduction to System Theory (P. Gilgen, Trans. D. Baecker Ed.). Cambridge: Polity. Luhmann, N., & Schorr, K.-E. (2000). Problems of Reflection in the System of Education. New York: Waxmann Munster. Morin, E. (2007). Restricted complexity, general complexity. Science and us: Philosophy and Complexity. Singapore: World Scientific, 1-25. Papastephanou, M. (2021). And that’s not all:(Sur) faces of justice in philosophy of education. Philosophies, 6(1), 10. Sen, A. K. (2009). The idea of justice: Harvard University Press. Valentini, L. (2012). Ideal vs. non‐ideal theory: A conceptual map. Philosophy Compass, 7(9), 654-664. Walzer, M. (1983). Spheres of Justice - A Defense of Pluralism and Eqaulity: Basic Books. Walzer, M. (1995). Respone. In D. Miller & M. Walzer (Eds.), Pluralism, Justice and Equality (pp. 281-298). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Warnick, B. R. (2015). Taming the conflict over educational equality. Journal of Applied Philosophy, 32(1), 50-66.