Session Information
23 SES 08 D, Hierarchies in post-compulsory education
Paper Session
Contribution
International education policy highlights career guidance as a pivotal tool for improving pupils' educational choices and facilitating educational transitions for integration into labour markets (OECD, 2024). This paper critically examines how educational choices are constructed as problematic within guidance policy proposals on compulsory and upper secondary schools in Sweden. This paper aims to problematise the assumptions underlying the relationship between educational choices, subsequent educational transitions, and social mobility as presented in policy for guidance.It is arguedthat this framing risks perpetuating inequalities in educational transitions and social mobility.
The analysis provides insights into how compensatory work in guidance aligns with the political ambitions of informed educational choices in historical contexts. Although the study focuses on Swedish education policy, the findings can inform other national or educational contexts.
Method
The methodological approach is based on Bacchi’s (2009) framework What’s the problem represented to be? It consists of a set of questions: 1.What’s the ‘problem’ represented to be in a specific policy or policy proposal? 2.What presuppositions or assumptions underpin this representation of the ‘problem’? 3. How has this representation of the ‘problem’ come about? 4.What is left unproblematic in this problem representation? Where are the silences? Can the ‘problem’ be thought about differently? 5.What effects are produced by this representation of the ‘problem’? 6. How/where has this representation of the ‘problem’ been produced, disseminated, and defended? How has it been (or could it be) questioned, disrupted, and replaced? Based on the aim of this study, we selected Q1, Q2, Q3, and Q4 for our analysis. Guided by these questions, the analysis explores the assumptions and presuppositions underpinning how educational choices and guidance are articulated. The empirical data consist of policy documents from 1992 to 2022, including curricula, Government Official Reports, and evaluations by authorities.
Expected Outcomes
The findings illustrate that the predominant problem representation frames pupils’ cognitive skills as central to educational choices, emphasising their ability to transcend social norms and ultimately enabling social mobility. This perspective individualises responsibility for navigating educational transitions. Firstly, the policy’s problem representation is described as a 'lack' or 'deficiency' of knowledge within the discourse of informed educational choices and awareness of social norms. Informed educational choices are anticipated to be fostered through self-knowledge, self-realisation, and self-reflection. However, how these choices are assessed – whether by ability, capability, or potentiality – reflects discourses of individualisation, responsibility, knowledge-based competition, and future orientation. In this process, pupils are shaped as ‘competent’ subjects (Dahmen, 2021) and autonomous subjects (cf. Romito, 2017). Drawing on Foucault, these subjectivities are shaped by a ‘dividing practice’ (Foucault, 1983) which separates individuals into those who are deemed competent and ‘not yet’ competent to make adequate choices, as well as those considered autonomous and ‘not yet’ autonomous in making independent choices. Secondly, the policy’s expectation of the compensatory work in guidance is constructed as a ‘solution’ to enhance educational choices that lead to further education, and, implicitly, individual social mobility. This assumption is based on meritocratic ideals of individual action and social mobility. It is argued that the compensatory work in guidance may unintentionally reproduce the gap between individuals classified as competent and those deemed not yet competent. Competencies are not a fixed attribute; instead, those classified as competent continuously develop and enhance their abilities, perpetuating division. It risks reproducing and consolidating inequalities within the education system, as it fails to consider a ‘deeper, more structural understanding of equality’ (Ingram & Gamsu, 2022, p. 27).
References
Dahmen, S. (2021). Constructing the “competent” pupil: Optimizing human futures through testing? Social Inclusion, 9, 347–360. Foucault, M. (1983). The subject and power. In H. Dreyfus & P. Rabinow (Eds.), Beyond structuralism and hermeneutics (pp. 208–226). The University of Chicago Press. Ingram, N., & Gamsu, S. (2022). Talking the Talk of Social Mobility: The Political Performance of a Misguided Agenda. Sociological Research Online, 27(1), 189-206. OECD. (2024). Challenging social inequality through career guidance: Insights from international data and practice. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/619667e2-en Romito, M. (2019). Governing through guidance: An analysis of educational guidance practices in an Italian lower secondary school. Discourse, 40(6), 773–788.
Update Modus of this Database
The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER.
Search the ECER Programme
- Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
- Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
- Search for authors and in the respective field.
- For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
- If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.