Session Information
07 SES 13 A, Learning As We See It: Actor-Led Methods For Values-Driven, Equitable, And Context-Sensitive Education
Symposium
Contribution
Student motivation is pivotal for student learning outcomes. The nature of motivation is the individual’s energy to work effectively, with intrinsic and student-led experiences being the most powerful for learner success–even flourishing (Martin, 2008). This means that the optimal student learning will usually be student-led: that is, prompted, driven, designed, even implemented by students wherever possible (Nalonga, 2024). However, students are persistently ‘done to’ when it comes to interventions for student motivation. Between 2021 and 2025, over 6000 studies were published with ‘student motivation’ as a keyword. Despite their united focus on the internal process of student motivation, only 14 of the 6033 publications featured the phrase, “student voice”, in the abstract and only seven with the phrase, “student-led” (Salter, 2021). Furthermore, the studies were mostly preoccupied with interventions typically designed by adults rather than students, and usually professionals with distal rather than immediate connections with students themselves such as academics or psychologists who operate outside of the school setting on a daily basis (Schmidt et al, 2017; Ng, 2020). Yet, there is a highly social, indeed power-related, process that underlies student motivation. A student-led and student-first research design would align with this, to shed light on the fundamentally intra-individual process that is learner motivation. Classic grounded theory (Glaser and Strauss, 1967) invites the researcher to step back from the field, and become a neutral inquirer and observer. Unlike the more prevalent constructivist approach (Charmaz, 2014), a degree of detachment is necessary, to let the data speak for themselves (Walsh et al, 2020) . If students are empowered to steer the research, then this actor-led approach to student motivation will be more ethical and equitable than what has come before. The present study considers the following research question of student motivation in the UK. In the existing and established student motivation research, how empowered are students in reality? Is the student experience truly central to the research process and to the implementation of research outcomes? If not, how can research on student motivation be conducted through truly student-led processes? This study focuses on student voices for a student-led unveiling of student motivation. We employ walking one-to-one interviews; student-led focus groups and discussion groups; individual student journals; and working parties where students guide the next steps of the researcher. Thus, this study presents an innovative approach to investigating student motivation in the natural setting of an English comprehensive secondary school.
References
Charmaz, K. (2014). Grounded Theory in Global Perspective: Reviews by International Researchers. Qualitative Inquiry, 20(9), 1074-1084. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800414545235 Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press. Martin, A. J. (2008) ‘Enhancing student motivation and engagement: The effects of a multidimensional intervention.’ in Contemporary Educational Psychology, Vol. 33, pages 239–269. DOI:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2006.11.003 Nalonga, R.B. (2024). ‘The Impact of Student-Led Learning: Empowering Students to Take Charge of Their Education’ in Eurasian Experiment Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, Vol. 5, Issue 2, pages 48-51. Ng, C. (2020) ‘Mathematics Self-Schema, Motivation, and Subject Choice Intention: A Multiphase Investigation’ in Journal of Educational Psychology. Salter, K. (2021). ‘What recommendations can be made for the design and implementation of academic motivation interventions? A systematic review.’ Unpublished Masters Dissertation. University of Southampton. Schmidt, J., Shumow, L., Hayal, Z.K.C. (2017) ‘Does Mindset Intervention Predict Students’ Daily Experience in Classrooms? A Comparison of Seventh and Ninth Graders’ Trajectories?’ in Journal of Youth Adolescence, Vol. 46, pages 582-602. Walsh, I., Holton, J. and Mourmant, G. (2020). Conducting Classic Grounded Theory for Business and Management Students. London: Sage Publications
Update Modus of this Database
The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER.
Search the ECER Programme
- Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
- Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
- Search for authors and in the respective field.
- For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
- If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.