Session Information
07 SES 06 C, Confronting Racism and Everyday Discrimination in Schools
Paper Session
Contribution
In recent years, the rise of antiracist movements globally has prompted deep reflection on the dynamics of race, power, and social justice in diverse contexts. Finland, with its unique historical and social backdrop, presents an interesting case study. According to the European Agency for Fundamental Rights (2023), racism in Finland is a serious issue. Racism is often recognised and discussed on an individual level as a part of a personal belief system or attitudes but not recognised as systemic processes where racialization and whiteness are embedded in the education systems in Finland (Kurki, 2019), and across Europe (Fylkesnes, 2019; Monteiro, 2024; Tate & Page, 2018). Finnish teacher education and the professionalisation of teachers have been praised globally. However, scholars have noted that Finnish multicultural education at schools has laid the foundation for categorising racialised children and youth as immigrants or Finnish as second language speakers despite their language or nationality (Layne, 2016, 2021; Paavola & Pesonen, 2021; Rissanen et al. 2023). In a similar manner, racism as a structural issue (Keskinen, Seikkula & Mkwesha, 2021) and part of the everyday experiences in school practices (Peltola & Phoenix, 2022; Souto, 2013) and whiteness continues to be the norm in higher education (Souto & Leppänen, 2024), including teacher education. Antiracism education has been extremely limited in Finland, especially in teacher education (Aminkeng Atabong & Seikkula, 2018), so it is crucial to understand how student teachers view racism and antiracism, and how it is part of their everyday experiences. Beyond antiracism pedagogy, curricula that recognise Finnish/Euro/Western centrism is paramount. This paper presents results from a research project on antiracism pedagogy in teacher education that has been conducted in four Finnish universities.
Method
The research applies critical social sciences approach to identify themes of antiracism in teacher education curricula in four universities in Finland, with reference to similar studies in teacher education in Europe (e.g. Fylkesnes, 2019; Monteiro, 2024; Tate & Page, 2018). Student teachers' understanding and experiences of racism is studied using a survey with closed and open questions that was collaboratively designed by the team of teacher educators/researchers from the participating universities and based on a pilot questionnaire used in one of the universities. The data includes teacher education curricula and student teachers’ survey responses (N=88) from the participating universities. The data were analysed using applied segmented thematic analysis (Guest, MacQueen & Namey, 2012).
Expected Outcomes
The results indicate that student teachers recognize the existence of racism but can only largely observe it as outsiders without noticing the majority (white) privilege and the structural racism that exists in education. This raises a concern over the gap between teacher education and the reality in schools. Moreover, the results suggest means to tackle racism are necessary and emphasize the importance of including antiracism pedagogies in teacher education. Interpreting our findings in the light of previous research from other European contexts, antiracism in teacher education requires creating spaces for critical border-thinking (Windle & Afonso, 2022), active reflection and working on (un)conscious biases with student teachers (Tate & Page, 2018), addressing micro-aggressions (Pérez Huber & Solorzano, 2014), and moreover, and making teacher educators responsible for transforming teacher education (Fylkesnes & Mayora Synnes, 2025).
References
Aminkeng Atabong, A. (2021). Pedagogy of Antiracist Best Practices for Finnish Schools. Educational Practice and Theory, 43(2), 37-52. Aminkeng Atabong, A., & Seikkula, M. (2018). What, why and how do we do what we do? In A. A. Atabong (Ed.), Antiracism education in and out of schools (pp. 171–193). Palgrave Macmillan. European Agency for Fundamental Rights. (2023). Fundamental Rights Report 2023. Fylkesnes, S. (2019). Patterns of racialised discourses in Norwegian teacher education policy: Whiteness as a pedagogy of amnesia in the national curriculum. Journal of Education Policy, 34(3), 394-422. Fylkesnes, S. Gils, B. & Mayora Synnes, R. (2025). Teacher educators matter: a call for countering the workings of Whiteness in so-called postracial societies through a pedagogy of remembrance and accountability. Whiteness and Education, DOI: 10.1080/23793406.2024.2448268 Guest, G., MacQueen, M. & Namey, E.E. (2012). Applied Thematic Analysis. SAGE. Kasa, T. (2025) Unveiling Injustices: Revisiting Human Rights Education’s Legal, Political and Moral Ideals in a Nonideal World. Dissertationes Universitatis Helsingiensis 5/2025. Korte, S.-M., Paksuniemi, M., Keskitalo, P., Selkälä, A., Körkkö, M., Anderson, K., Sarivaara, E. & Joona, T. (2024). Finnish pre-service teachers’ knowledge about the Indigenous Sámi people. Diaspora, Indigenous, and Minority Education, DOI: 10.1080/15595692.2024.2415018 Kurki, T. (2019). Immigrant-ness as (Mis)Fortune? Immigrantisation through integration policies and practices in education. Helsinki Studies in Education 40. University of Helsinki. Monteiro, A.R.M. (2024) ‘So do you hear me? And “how” do you hear me?’ Perceptions of lecturers on students from Portuguese-speaking African countries in Portuguese higher education. Language and Intercultural Communication, 24(4), 314-329. Peltola, M., & Phoenix, A. (2022). Doing whiteness and masculinities at school: Finnish 12–15- year-olds’ narratives on multiethnicity. In J. Hoegaerts, E. Peterson, T. Liimatainen, & L. Hekanaho (Eds.), Finnishness, whiteness and coloniality (pp. 101–127). Helsinki University. https://hup.fi/site/chapters/e/10.33134/HUP-17-5/. Paavola, H. & Pesonen, J. (2021). Diversity discourses in the Finnish National Core Curriculum for Early Childhood Education and Care. Journal of Early Childhood Education Research, 10(3), 1-20. Pérez Huber, L. & Solorzano, G.D. (2014). Racial microaggressions as a tool for critical race research. Race, Ethnicity and Education, 18(3), 297–320. https://doi.org/10.1080/13613324.2014.994173 Souto, A.-M- & Lappalainen, S. (2024). Normative whiteness in Finnish university education, Critical Studies in Education, DOI: 10.1080/17508487.2024.2347276. Tate, S. & Page, D. (2018). Whiteliness and institutional racism: Hiding behind (un)conscious bias. Ethics & Education, 13(1), 141–155. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449642.2018.1428718 Windle, J.A. & Afonso, É.F. (2022). Building anti-racist education through spaces of border thinking. Critical Studies in Education, 63(5), 606-621.
Update Modus of this Database
The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER.
Search the ECER Programme
- Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
- Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
- Search for authors and in the respective field.
- For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
- If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.