Sexual Diversity in the English National Curriculum: Teachers’ and Young LGB-identified People’s Experiences in the City of Birmingham, UK
Author(s):
Helen Sauntson (presenting / submitting) Kathryn Simpson (presenting)
Conference:
ECER 2011
Format:
Paper

Session Information

04 SES 14 B, Gender and Inclusion

Paper Session

Time:
2011-09-16
15:00-16:30
Room:
JK 29/124,G, 42
Chair:
Gottfried Biewer

Contribution

This paper reports on research which investigates English teachers’ and young LGB-identified (lesbian, gay and bisexual) people’s perceptions of the ways in which sexuality is discursively constructed in the English national curriculum. The main research objective is to contribute to developing understandings of sexuality in/equalities in urban educational contexts, particularly in relation to the curriculum. The British government has stated their aim to ‘help schools tackle bullying in schools, especially homophobic bullying’ (http://programmeforgovernment.hmg.gov.uk/schools/). Our research engages with this as well as with reports produced by the UK-based gay campaigning group Stonewall. These reports (Hunt and Jensen, 2007; Guasp,2009) demonstrate that homophobia is pervasive in UK schools, resulting in a myriad of problems for both students and teachers which urgently need to be addressed as a part of inclusive education. Homophobia in schools has been shown to have detrimental effects on pupils’ well-being, safety and academic achievement (e.g. Epstein and Johnson, 1998; Pearson, Muller & Wilkinson, 2007; Roen et al, 2007). However, these issues are now starting to be addressed, especially in urban areas of the UK –  the city of Birmingham is one such area. Birmingham city council is a member of Stonewall’s ‘Education Champions’ programme. This programme is a progressive strategy which provides local authorities with bespoke support and guidance in tackling homophobia in schools. The research draws on qualitative data from semi-structured interviews with English teachers and young LGB-identified people in Birmingham. The main questions asked by this research are:

 

1. What kinds of sexuality discourses are perceived by teacher and young people as existing in the secondary English curriculum?

2. How are the effects of the sexuality discourses identified in the curriculum seen as having an impact on LGB-identified young people?

3. If homophobic discourses are identified, what (if anything) is being done to challenge them through the content of the English curriculum and its delivery?

4. Does the city of Birmingham’s commitment to tackling homophobia in schools have any perceived effect on any of the above?

 

The research draws on theoretical insights from queer theory, especially the work of Butler (1993; 1997; 1999; 2004) as well as some aspects of critical discourse analysis (Fairclough, 1995; 2001). Both frameworks are used to interrogate the ways in which ideologies of sexuality and constructed and circulated in the English school curriculum.

Sexuality has, arguably, received less attention than other aspects of inclusive education, even within urban contexts. Therefore, more research on sexuality in relation to various aspects of schooling is urgently-needed in order to improve the well-being of students and those involved in their education. It is hoped that increasing the visibility of sexuality within international research in inclusive education will contribute to challenging the culture of silence that exists around sexuality in our secondary schools. Through presenting our research at the ECER conference, we hope to engage in dialogue with participants from other European countries to explore how issues around sexual diversity and in/equality are dealt with through school curricula and in different urban educational contexts.

Method

The research reported on in this paper is qualitative and localised. A sample of English teachers based in a range of secondary schools within the city of Birmingham in the UK were interviewed in order to investigate their perceptions of what kinds of sexuality discourses in the content and delivery of the English curriculum. A sample of LGB-identified young people who attended schools in the Birmingham area were also interviewed for the same purpose. All interviews were semi-structured. Comparisons were made across the interviews to draw out areas of similarity and difference according to which school participants were based in across the city of Birmingham. The interview data were analysed using elements of Butlerian queer theory (e.g. Butler, 1993; 1997; 1999; 2004) and critical discourse analysis (e.g. Fairclough, 1995; 2001) in order to focus on their content and the language used to reflect on the issues raised by the participants.

Expected Outcomes

Initial findings of the research indicate that th teachers and young people involved in the study perceive sexual diversity as being largely invisible in the English curriculum across all of the schools. Although the curriculum does not explicitly state that sexual diversity can not be explored and addressed through the teaching of English, all of the teachers and young people interviewed in the study confirmed that this happens rarely, if at all. Therefore, whilst the English curriculum is not explicitly homophobic, it does seem to embody a discourse of heteronormativity. There were, however, some slight variations in the responses given by participants, depending on which type of school and/or which part of the city they were located. These variations were linked to the social demographic of the school population (especially in relation to gender and ethnicity) and the levels of support offered by the local city council around sexual diversity in schools. At the time of conducting the research, Birmingham city council was participating in the Stonewall ‘Education Champions’ programme which aims to challenge and reduce homophobic bullying in Birmingham schools. This programme was evidently having varying degrees of success and impact across the schools involved in our study.

References

Butler, J. (1993) Bodies That Matter: On the Discursive Limits of “Sex”. New York: Routledge. Butler, J. (1997) Excitable Speech: A Politics of the Performative. New York: Routledge. Butler, J. (1999) Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity (2nd edition). New York: Routledge. Butler, J. (2004) Undoing Gender. New York: Routledge. The Coalition: Our Programme for Government http://programmeforgovernment.hmg.gov.uk/schools/ (Accessed 1.10.10) Epstein, D. and Johnson, R. (1998) Schooling Sexualities. Buckingham: Open University Press. Fairclough, N. (1995) Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Longman. Fairclough, N. (2001) Language and Power (2nd edition). London: Longman. Guasp, A. (2009) The Teachers’ Report: Homophobic Bullying in Britain’s Schools. London: Stonewall. Hunt, R. and Jensen, J. (2007) The School Report: The Experiences of Young Gay People in Britain’s Schools. London: Stonewall. Pearson, J., Muller, C. and Wilkinson, L. (2007). Adolescent same-sex attraction and academic outcomes: The role of school attachment and engagement. Social Problems, 54 (4), 523-542. Roen, K. et al (2007) The Cultural Context of Youth Suicide: Identity, Gender and Sexuality. ESRC-funded project 2005-2007 (RES 000221239).

Author Information

Helen Sauntson (presenting / submitting)
University of Birmingham
School of Education
Birmingham
Kathryn Simpson (presenting)
University of Birmingham
School of Edcuation
Birmingham

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.