Self-concept in excellent and average university students
Conference:
ECER 2011
Format:
Poster

Session Information

22 SES 9.5 PE/PS, Poster Exhibition / Poster Session

Time:
2011-09-15
12:00-13:30
Room:
Seminarzentrum - Posters
Chair:

Contribution

 

 

The results that we present are based on a three years research.[1]. We try to analyze, among other aspects, what the students with the best grades to access to University do which can explain its academic achievement, in order to concrete effective operational models that can be generalized and taught, as far as possible. In order to do it we are analyzing the learning ways of several groups of 1st year students with the best grades when accessing at University. Students are from different degrees and belong to the Polytechnic University of Valencia. Their results will be compared to other students’ results with average grades of the same degrees.

To obtain it, we are assessing their learning strategies, their learning approaches, their learning styles, their attitudes towards learning and other relevant variables (self-concept, IQ, the perception of their teachers and their classmates, the integration at University, the assessment of their professors, etc). In this research, started in 2010, we will do a monitoring of students’ progress for their first two years of permanence at University, by taking several measures to collect data throughout the whole period of investigation.

We want to state the possible existing differences in the self-concept between the two groups of students (excellent and average) using the initial data collected. We also want to state the influence of attitudes on academic achievement. These are the results that we present in this paper.

Concerning the theoretical founding, we want to point out that, in the present research we understand self-concept as a construct that represents the concept that one person has about himself as a physical, social and spiritual  being (García and Musitu, 2001). Affective-evaluative component attached to it is the self-esteem, being the personal satisfaction of the individual himself. The self-concept is defined by how one person sees himself and self-esteem by how one person values and appreciates himself. Both terms have been used, sometimes, like synonymous, and sometimes like complementary. In any case they would be two faces of the same coin, one of them integrating the cognitive dimension and the other one the affective dimension of the same reality. The research has confirmed the existing significant positive relationship between self-concept and academic achievement, usually of the academic self-concept dimension (Amezcua and Fernandez, 2000; Boxtel and Monks, 1992; Gargallo, Garfella, Sanchez, Rios and Serra, 2009, Herrera, Ramirez, Roa and Herrera, 2004, Jones and Grieneeks, 1970).

We have no data on this subject contextualized in excellent and average students in the scientific literature, so we believe we can make a significant contribution.

[1]It is the "Longitudinal approach: an analysis of the influential factors that enabled some University students to achieve excellent grades. Design of an intervention’s model" research, approved by the Spanish Education and Science’ Ministry  into the National Basic Research Program, 2009 (2010-2012) (Financing Plan E, PGE), directed by Professor Ph.D. Bernardo Gargallo (code EDU2009/08518).

 

Method

We used a quasi-experimental design of non-equivalent control group, complemented with a methodology of correlational type. We selected 11 groups of students pertaining to 11 degrees of 9 centers of the Polytechnic University of Valencia, (first and second cycle). The initial sample was integrated by 281 students, 148 excellent and 133 average. The projected minimum sample was of 10 excellent students and 10 average students per each group, giving a total of 220 students. Nevertheless we selected a sample of nearly 300 subjects, preventing the loss of participants. Of each degree were selected like “excellent” students those who had obtained the highest grades in the Test to Access to the University and like “average” those who had grades around the median of each degree, above and below this score. We used the AF5 (Autoconcepto Forma 5; Self-concept 5 Way) to assess the students’ self-concept (García y Musitu, 2001). This instrument consists of 30 items organized into five factors/types, each of them evaluated by 6 items: academic (α= 88), emotional (α= 73), familiar (α= 76), physical (α= 74) and social (α= 69). The reliability of the entire questionnaire is 0.810 (Cronbach's alpha coefficient).

Expected Outcomes

It was carried out a univariate and multivariate analysis of differences to check the possible differences between excellent and average groups. The results showed significant differences in the academic self-concept score (p <.001), favoring the excellent students, and in physical self-concept (p <.05), favoring the average students. No significant differences were found in the other factors, although the emotional, familiar and total scores favored to excellent students. We carried out multiple linear regression analysis, selecting as predictors variables the mean scores of the five factors/types of self-concept and as criteria variable the grades of the entrance exam to University. We found that only two factors contributed significantly to the prediction: academic self-concept and physical self-concept. We found a multiple correlation coefficient, R, of 0.508 and a R2 coefficient of 0.258, which supposes that the two factors account for approximately 25,80% of the variance in the grades. The first factor is the one with the greatest predictive power, explaining 14,5%. The correlation of academic self-concept is positive while that one of the physical self-concept is negative, which supposes that the first one predicts positive academic achievement and the second one negative. The "F" of ANOVA was 18,041 (p< 0.001), indicating a good predictive level. The results of our research show that excellent students have better general self-concept as well as academic, emotional and familiar self-concept that average students, and that academic self-concept is useful to predict better achievement. Nevertheless not the physical self-concept.

References

Amezcua, J.A. y Fernández, E. (2000). La influencia del autoconcepto en el rendimiento académico, Iberpsicología, 5.1. http://www.fedap.es/IberPsicologia/iberpsi5-1/amezcua/amezcua.htm. Consultado en 10 de octubre de 2007. Boxtel, H.B. & Monks, F.J. (1992). General, social and academic self-concept of gifted adolescents, Journal of Youth Adolescence, 21 (2), 169-185. Gargallo, B., Garfella, P.R., Sánchez, F., Ros, C. y Serra, B. (2009). La influencia del autoconcepto en el rendimiento académico en estudiantes universitarios. Revista de Orientación y Psicopedagogía, 20 (1), 16-28. García, F. y Musitu, G. (2001). Autoconcepto. Forma 5. Madrid: TEA. Gottlieb, R. & Rogers, J.L. (2002). Academic self-concept, academic achievement, and leadership in university students studying in a physical therapy program. Journal of Allied Health, 31(2):99-102. Herrera, F., Ramírez, Mª. I., Roa, J.Mª. y Herrera, I, (2004). ¿Cómo interactúan el autoconcepto y el rendimiento académico, en un contexto educativo pluricultural?, Revista Iberoamericana de Educación, Sección de Informes de Investigación. Jones, J.G. & Grieneeks, L. (1970). Measures of self-perception as predictor of scholastic performance, Journal of Educational Research, 63, 201-203. Marsh, H. W. & Craven, R. G. (2006). Reciprocal effects of self-concept and performance from a multidimensional perspective: Beyond seductive pleasure and unidimensional perspectives. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1, 133-163

Author Information

Bernardo Gargallo López (presenting / submitting)
University of Valencia
Educational Theory
Valencia
Polytechnic University of Valencia, Spain
University of Valencia, Spain
University of Valencia, Spain
University of Valencia, Spain

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.