Vandalism at schools: The Intersection of Urban and Academic Education?
Author(s):
Ina Herrmann (presenting / submitting)
Conference:
ECER 2011
Format:
Paper

Session Information

ERG SES D 02, Parallel Session D 02

Paper Session

Time:
2011-09-12
15:10-16:40
Room:
J 27/14,G, 69
Chair:
Dolf van Veen

Contribution

 

Topic:

Vandalism at schools: The Intersection of Urban and Academic Education?

Vandalism in itself is illegal, whether as a willful damage or defacement of property, as a political statement or a part of modern popular art (as long as there are no official permissions or assignments, of course), and it plays a predominant role in German crime statistics. Especially schools and other public institutions complain about an increase of vandalistic practices like graffiti on walls and tables or the destruction of parts of the building (broken windows, destructed toilets etc). There are different ways of handling these ‘expressive spatial practices’, for instance closing off buildings with fences and walls or intensifying the  monitoring by installing (more) observation cameras. But what do vandalistic practices mean in general and to adolescents, to the academic organization and education? What does vandalism have to do with e.g. street art and Urban education? Does the Urban "flow" into schools or do schools and academic learning avoid creative processes and practices such as graffiti? Deleuze and Guattari describe these processes of transformation as "Unnotched" ("Glättung") and "Notched" ("Kerbung"). So it is interesting to get to know where, when and why do adolescents notch or unnotch academic environment.

There are well-differentiated and useful psychological and pedagogic models and theories to explain vandalistic behavior of adolescents (e.g. theories of deviance) and theories concerning the aesthetic part of vandalism (e.g. art theories, street art) but the (latent) structure of meaning of vandalism has not yet been sufficiently explored. The theoretical framework of this doctoral thesis is composed of the work of Michel Foucault, Gilles Deleuze and Fèlix Guattari and Johan Frederik Hartle and can therefore be allocated in the poststructuralism line.

Method

First: the image reconstruction method by Max Imdahl to analyze photos and pictures of vandalism, second: reconstructed group discussions by the documentary method by Ralf Bohnsack to analyze collective orientation patterns and third: expert interviews with third parties like police officers or social education workers to analyze experiences concerning vandalistic practices and their causes.

Expected Outcomes

Vandalism can be described as an important component of academic organization. Academic and urban education and learning processes are interdependent; they affect and influence each other. Vandalistic practices open up “Heterotopias” (Foucault). These are important for organizations which are influenced by and embedded in urban educational processes and structures. So vandalism at schools could be marked as the intersection of both academic and urban education.

References

Baker, Keith/ Rubel, Robert J. (1980): Violence and crime in the schools. Massachusetts (USA) Bohnsack, Ralf (2010): Rekonstruktive Sozialforschung. 8. Auflage. Opladen und Farmington Hills/ MI (USA) Böhnisch, Lothar (2010): Abweichendes Verhalten. 4., überarb. Und erw. Auflage. Weinheim und München Casserly, Michael D./ Bass, Scott A./ Garrett John R. (1980): School vandalism. Massachusetts (USA) Chlada, Marvin (2005): Heterotopie und Erfahrung. Abriss der Heterotopologie nach Michel Foucault. Aschaffenburg Deleuze, Gilles/ Guattari, Félix (1997): Tausend Plateaus. Berlin Foucault, Michel (2004): Überwachen und Strafen. Die Geburt des Gefängnisses. Frankfurt am Main Foucault, Michel (2005): Analytik der Macht. Frankfurt am Main Hartle, Johan Frederik (2006): Der geöffnete Raum. Zur Politik der ästhetischen Form. München Klockhaus, Ruth/ Trapp-Michael, Anneliese: Vandalistisches Verhalten Jugendlicher. Göttingen Kornberger, Martin/ Clegg, Stewart R. (2004): Bringing space back in: Organizing the generative building, in: Organization Studies 25(7), S. 1095-1114 Lévy-Leboyer, Claude (Hrsg.) (1984): Vandalism, behaviour and motivations. Amsterdam Lorenz, Maren (2009): Vandalismus als Alltagsphänomen. Hamburg Nohl, Arnd-Michael (2008): Interview und dokumentarische Methode. Anleitungen für die Forschungspraxis. 2., überarbeitete Auflage. Wiesbaden Schneider, Mark (2001): Vandalismus. Erscheinungsformen, Ursachen und Prävention zerstörerischen Verhaltens sowie Auswirkungen des Vandalismus auf die Entstehung krimineller Milieus. Aachen Tygart, Clarence (1988): Public school vandalism: Toward a synthesis of theories and transition to paradigm analysis, in: Adolescence, 23/89 (1988: Spring), S. 187-200. Volkers, Achim (2008): Wissen und Bildung bei Foucault. Wiesbaden von Hentig, Hans (1967): Der jugendliche Vandalismus. Bielefeld Williams, Robert Bruce/ Venturini, Joseph L. (1981): School vandalism. Cause and cure. Saragota, Kalifornien (USA)

Author Information

Ina Herrmann (presenting / submitting)
University of Duisburg-Essen
Faculty of Educational Sciences
Essen

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.