“Reasonable adjustments” in relation to disability and social justice for children and young people in an inter-professional context
Author(s):
Paty Paliokosta (presenting / submitting) Leonie Kindness (presenting)
Conference:
ECER 2011
Network:
4. Inclusive Education
Format:
Poster

Session Information

04 SES 9.5 PE/PS, Poster Exhibition / Poster Session

Time:
2011-09-15
12:00-13:30
Room:
Seminarzentrum - Posters
Chair:

Contribution

Under the wider policy framework as framed primarily (amongst other documents and acts) by the Every Child Matters agenda (DFES, 2004), the Removing Barriers to Achievement (2004) document, the Disability and Discrimination Act (DFES, 2005), Aiming High for disabled Children (2007) and the Lamb Enquiry (2009) that lead to further publications on parental confidence and involvement, the reasonable adjustments duty has become even more prominent for schools and settings in England.    The reasonable adjustments duty has become statutory since 2007 and plethora of supportive material has been available to support settings on the implementation of what could be seen as a far more social orientated model of disability.  

This poster will communicate the findings of a qualitative, small-scale project under the umbrella of ICCIP (Institute for Child Centred Interprofessional Practice, Kingston University) that investigates those  processes in action by exploring discourses and practices relating to ‘reasonable adjustments’ as used and understood by different stakeholders, front line workers (teachers, TAs), multi-agency service providers, school management teams, parents and the children themselves -for whom the adjustments have taken place.  Shared values, beliefs and preparedness for inclusion verse exclusion will be explored through the above stakeholders’ voices.

 

Method

The study is in line with a qualitative interpretative research paradigm and aims a) to identify issues that will frame the research agenda, b) to explore in-depth the experiences of different stakeholders of reasonable adjustments in an inter-professional context, c) to gain a better understanding of the personal/social outcomes of these adjustments through the voice of the child. In the context of this project three primary school children from one-form entry inner-city primary school in London were selected. Each of the selected children has been part of the school’s inclusion register for an identified additional educational need or disability and their inclusion has required some kind of reasonable adjustment. One important aspect of the methodology of this project is the focus on service-user involvement and participation. Not only is one of the researchers also a service-user, but participants are invited to influence the direction of research in this and future projects, in line with the many advantages of this process outlined in the recent INVOLVE report (2009).

Expected Outcomes

The voices and experiences of stakeholders will inform a discussion about the need perhaps for a response along the lines of a ‘social pedagogy’ found in large parts of Western Europe and Scandinavia were education would be something much more than schools. It is based on a fundamentally holistic concept of children and adults in which the teachers concentrate on teaching but not in isolation (Whitney, 2007). Following this project, there is also scope for creating a network of stakeholders from different settings/boroughs on issues of inter-professional practice to promote positive and innovative examples of successful reasonable adjustments and their sustainability within a social model of disability. Possibilities for parent participation and possible parent forums will be explored, in line with recent government guidelines (Davies, 2010).

References

Davies, Sheila (March 2010) The How to guide for Parent Participation. Together for Disabled Children. Department for Education and Skills (DfES) (1995) Disability Discrimination Act. London: The Statutory Office. Department for Education and Skills (DfES) (2001) Special Educational Needs Code of Practice. London: The Statutory Office. Department for Education and Skills (2004) Every child matters: change for children in schools. Nottingham : DfES Department for Education and Skills (DfES) (2004) Removing Barriers to Achievement: The Goverments Strategy for SEN. Nottingham: DfES Publications. Department of Education and Skills (DfES) (2007) Aiming High for disabled Children: H.M Treasury. Department for Education and Skills (DfES) (2009) The Lamb Enquiry. London: The Statutory Office. Rieser, R. (2010) www.worldofinclusion.com Stanley,K (2009) Exploring Impact: Public involvement in NHS, public health and social care research. INVOLVE , Eastleigh Whitney, B. (2007) Social Inclusion in Schools- Improving Outcomes, Raising Standards, London: Routledge.

Author Information

Paty Paliokosta (presenting / submitting)
KINGSTON UNIVERSITY
LONDON
Leonie Kindness (presenting)
SGUL, ST GEORGE'S, UNIVERSITY OF LONDON

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.