Gendered Experiences Of Schooling: Dynamics And Inequalities Within Four Caribbean Secondary Schools
Author(s):
Mike Younger (presenting / submitting) Mary Cobbett
Conference:
ECER 2012
Format:
Paper

Session Information

04 SES 10 B, Gender and Inclusion

Parallel Paper Session

Time:
2012-09-20
15:30-17:00
Room:
FFL - Aula 17
Chair:
Dóra Sigríður Bjarnason

Contribution

This paper aims to examine the ‘gender regime’ of secondary schools in the Caribbean, through a case study of four secondary schools in the small Eastern Caribbean nation state of Antigua and Barbuda.

Most research on ‘gender and education’ in the Caribbean has focussed on achievement with the result that girls emerge as a ‘success story’ due to their overall higher academic achievement, and boys’ apparent under-achievement – as in other parts of the western world - has been problematised (Figueroa,2000; Chevannes, 2002; De Lisle et al, 2005). Yet research in other contexts (Francis, 2006; Warrington & Younger, 2011) has shown that a focus on boys’ academic achievement often masks other problems and inequalities, such as girls’ continuing low self-esteem, boys’ domination of classroom space and teacher attention, continued inequitable power dynamics and beliefs that it is still better to be a boy.

The extent to which these issues exist has not been well researched in the Caribbean context. In particular, there is a real lack of in-depth qualitative research which explores gender dynamics in schools anywhere in the Caribbean. The studies that do exist are few in number, now slightly dated (Bailey, 2002; Parry, 1996, 1997; Plummer, 2008), and have largely been conducted in Jamaica.  However, these studies indicate that broader research on gender issues is needed in the Caribbean. For example, Bailey’s research on gendered dynamics inside Jamaican secondary school classrooms highlights girls’ experiences of sexual harassment from boys and male teachers and Parry’s research demonstrates that teachers hold strongly gendered stereotypes about boys and girls which inform the way they treat pupils in the classroom.

This paper is located within a gender-relational theoretical context, challenging the recuperative masculinity perspective which has dominated much of the recent debate about gender and achievement in Europe and Australasia, to identify the ‘hidden’ gender inequalities which may exist that have been masked by a focus on achievement scores, and to consider how the gender regime impacts upon the quality of schooling and of well-being for girls. The outcomes of the research are offered as contributing to the debate about the gender regimes of schools, not only in the Caribbean but in the United Kingdom and other parts of Europe such as Scandinavia, Iberia and Germany. 

Research objectives:

·         To examine evidence of differential gendered treatment in the formal and informal structures of the school and daily practices.

·         To understand how girls, boys and teachers view the experiences of schooling in relation to gender.

·         To understand how male and female pupils and teachers perform masculinity and femininity in the school context.

·         To highlight specific areas of concern that may have been missed by a focus on achievement.

·         To explore the extent to which girls, boys and teachers resist the prevailing institutional culture.

·         To collect evidence of good practice with regards to gender that can be shared with other schools.

Method

Research methodology The research has been framed within a qualitative approach and conducted in four co-educational government secondary schools. Data collection has focused on students in years 1 and 3 (11-14 age groups), and has involved: • Classroom observations: differential use of space by boys and girls, nature of teacher activity and of teacher talk / questioning, teacher-student interactions, student-student interactions. • Single-sex focus- group discussions with girls and boys, to identify students’ perceptions of the realities of their schooling, of gender relations and of the gender regimes of their schools. • Individual semi-structured interviews with teachers, to establish teachers’ perceptions of the ways in which gender is ‘played out’ within the formal and informal structures of the school. The three sets of data have been triangulated to enable us to develop some understanding of the perceptions of the gender regime in each school, and to explore the similarities and mismatches between the perspectives offered. All interview tapes were fully transcribed, with analysis undertaken using QSR NVivo 8 software package. Initial analysis was undertaken deductively, and subsequent inductive analysis then drew out insights from the data themselves.

Expected Outcomes

Initial analysis is offering multi-faceted perspectives about the gender regimes of these schools, and challenging simplistic notions. Different groups of girls exhibited very different behaviours and performances of femininity, not always related to their achievement levels and the ways they were perceived by teachers. In contrast to common depictions of Caribbean schools as ‘feminine institutions’ needing to be more ‘boy friendly’, most boys thought that it was definitely easier to be a boy at school, whereas girls were fairly evenly split in terms of whether they thought it was easier to be a boy or a girl. Gendered assumptions informed how many teachers responded to students, thus reiterating and reproducing gender differences in students’ behaviour; the idea of ‘soft girls’ and ‘hard boys’ was perpetuated explicitly through disciplinary regimes in schools, which operated to reinforce male power and authority in spite of the presence of female principals. Teachers seemed to be in the contradictory position of seeing macho behaviour in school as a key problem, but inadvertently encouraging it. Issues of concern to students (bullying, sexual harassment, the valorisation of violence) were ‘masked by a focus on achievement scores’ since they are conspicuous by their absence in teachers’ narratives.

References

Bailey, B. 2002. Gendered realities: fact or fiction? The realities in a secondary level coeducational classroom. In: Mohammed, P., ed. Gendered realities: essays in Caribbean feminist thought. Kingston: University of the West Indies Press. Chevannes, B (2002) ‘What you sow is what you reap: violence and construction of male identity in Jamaica’ Current Issues in Comparative Education 2(1), 51-61 De Lisle, J., Smith, P. & Jules, V (2005) Which males or females are most at risk and on what? An analysis of gender differentials within the primary school system of Trinidad and Tobago Educational Studies, 31 (4) p 393-418 Figueroa, M (2000) ‘Making sense of male experience: the case of academic underachievement in the English-speaking Caribbean’ IDS Bulletin Vol 31(2), 68-74 Francis, B (2006) ‘‘Heroes or zeroes?’ The discursive positioning of ‘underachieving boys’ in English neo-liberal education policy’ Journal of Educational Policy 21(2), 187-200 Parry, O (1996) ‘In one ear and out the other: unmasking masculinities in the Caribbean classroom Sociological Research Online 1(2) Parry, O (1997) ‘Schooling is fooling: why do Jamaican boys underachieve at school’ Gender and Education 9(2), 223-232 Plummer, D (2008) Has learning become taboo and is risk-taking compulsory for Caribbean boys? Researching the relationship between masculinities, education and HIV. IN: Morrissey M., Plummer, D., Bundy D Challenging HIV & AIDS: a new role for Caribbean education. Kingston: Ian Randall Publishing Warrington, M & Younger, M (2011) 'Life is a tightrope': reflections on peer group inclusion and exclusion amongst adolescent girls and boys, Gender and Education, 22, 3: pp 153-168.

Author Information

Mike Younger (presenting / submitting)
University of Cambridge
Faculty of Education
Cambridge
University of Cambridge, United Kingdom

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.