A Review of Media Literacy Education: How is it Integrate into the Curriculum
Author(s):
Hui Zhang (presenting / submitting) Chang Zhu (presenting)
Conference:
ECER 2012
Format:
Paper

Session Information

ERG SES F 07, Media/ digital literacy

parallel paper session

Time:
2012-09-18
09:00-10:30
Room:
FCEE - Aula 2.7
Chair:
Fiona Hallett

Contribution

As the global village continues to be wired up electronically, and as individuals move their daily lives online, mass media plays a tremendous and increasing role in the society (Clay, 2003). Copps (2006) stated that in a culture where media is pervasive and invasive, kids need to think critically about they see, hear and read. Livingstone and Bovill (1999) define media literacy as reaching the original source of information, and ability to understand the power, limitations, and shape of the content presented in the media. The European Commission defines media literacy as the ability to access the media, to understand and to critically evaluate different aspects of the media and media contents and to create communications in a variety of contexts. School-based initiatives play a vital role in the process of media literacy education (Hobb, 2004; Tanriverdi, 2008). Scheibe & Rogow (2008) pointed out that routine integration is much more effective than simply treating media literacy as an isolated topic and may better meet the needs of teachers who are already at capacity with the demands of a full curriculum. At the same time, one challenge for educators is to incorporate media literacy programs as an integral part of education (Wakefild, 2009). Therefore, how to integrate media literacy education into curriculum is of uttermost importance in school education. Despite the growing recognition of media literacy education as a field of study, few researchers have focused on its implementation (Stein & Prewerr, 2009), especially on how to integrate media literacy education into curriculum. Therefore, this article presents a systematic qualitative review of curriculum integration of media literacy education. The focus of this literature review is on the European context, as the main European countries are the pioneering countries in media literacy education. But relevant documents from other contexts such as the United States, China and Turkey are also reviewed, as the China Web savvy population is the second in the world after the United State (Internet World Stat, 2007), and the emerging and development of MLE in Turkey is also noteworthy.

 

The structures for the implementation of Media Literacy Education (MLE) in schools differ from one country to another in the different EU member states (Koller, Haider & Dall, 2005). The status of MLE in different countries is diverse and it is difficult to find a standard model or best practices about how MLE should be integrated in the school curriculum. As to the objectives of MLE, there is also no consistent policies among European countries, neither is there any congruence among the non-European countries. This literature review aims to understand how media literacy education is integrated in the curriculum in primary and secondary education and what are the objectives of MLE. Since there is a lack of consistent views and a lack of comprehensive review on the issue of the integration of MLE in school curriculum, this research is conducted to fill in this gap.

Method

As a narrative review, the method applied in this review included systematic searching, reviewing, and writing this review of the literature to bring together key themes and findings of research in this field. The identification of the primary studies in this review was based on a pre-defined search strategy and a multi-step selection process. Search terms and phrases were identified which included media literacy education, media education, critical media literacy education, media literacy, media literacy education and curriculum, media education in school, etc. Authoritative electronic databases and other sources were searched including ERIC, Elsevier ScienceDirect, Web of Science, Education Full Text, ProQuest, Jstor, the journal of Media Literacy Education, Google, Google Scholar and the website of the European Union, etc. After the initial searching, the initial collected data were screened to select the documents only related to the teaching of MLE or the integration of MLE in school curriculum. Among the selected documents, the following countries are included: the United Kingdom, France, Germany, Finland, Netherland, Italy, Greece, Austria, Sweden, Switzerland, Ireland, Hungary, Turkey, United States and China.

Expected Outcomes

The analysis of the documents show that there are 4 stages or 4 types of integration of MLE in school curriculum: A) MLE is included in the curriculum as an independent course, B) MLE is included in the curriculum as an integral part of certain courses, C) MLE is integrated or is expected to be integrated into all courses, D) MLE is not included in the curriculum, but is an experimental course in some schools. European countries are quite diverse with regard to their stage of MLE integration. Successful media literacy education in schools is built on the curricula and curriculum guidelines established by the relevant authorities, and legislation concerning allocation of funds for development; dissemination and training is also of importance. As to the objectives of MLE, in many European countries, the following objectives are set up: developing active citizenship, intercultural communication, critical thinking skills and creativity. In the United Sates, the following goals are set: protection, promotion of health and social development; promotion of citizenship and democracy; acquisition of tools for learning and self-expression; and the enjoyment and appreciation of media as a creative art form. The different types of integration and their objectives are presented and discussed.

References

Bektas, M. C. (2009). Media Literacy Course in Faculties of Communication in TRNC. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences. 1, 446-449 Clay,R. (2003). Unraveling New Media’s Effects on Children. Monitor on Psychology. 34(2). February. Hobb, R. (2004). A Review of School-Based Initiatives in Media Literacy Education. American Behavioral Scientist 48, 42-59 Koller, M., Haider, A., Dall, E. (2005). Case Studies of Conditions and Success Criteria in Media Literacy Education. Retrieved Jan.29, 2011from http://ecml.pc.unicatt.it/download/results/Case%20Studies_en.pdf Oguzhan, O. & Haydari, N. (2011).The state of media literacy in Turkey. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences 15, 2827–2831 Rantala, L. (2011). Finnish Media Literacy Education Policies and Best Practices in Early Childhood Education and Care Since 2004. The National Association for Media Literacy Education’s Journal of Media Literacy Education 3(2), 123 – 133 Scheibe & Rogow (2008). Basic Ways to Integrate Media Literacy and Critical Thinking into Any Curriculum. Ithaca College. Stein & Prewerr. ( 2009). Media Literacy Education in the Social Studies: Teacher Perceptions and Curriculum Challenges. Teacher Education Quarterly. Winter: 131-148 Sperry, C. (2010). The Epistemological Equation: Integrating Media Analysis into the Core Curriculum. The National Association for Media Literacy Education’s Journal of Media Literacy Education 1(2), 89-98 Stuckey, H. & Kring, K. (2007). Critical Media Literacy and Popular Film: Experiences of Teaching and Learning in a Graduate Class. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education. 115, 25-33 Tanriverdi, B. & Apark, O. (2010). Analysis of Primary School Curriculum of Turkey, Finland, and Ireland in Terms of Media Literacy Education. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice 10 (2), 1187-1213 Torres, M. & Mercado, M. (2006) The Need for Critical Media Literacy In Teacher Education Core Curricula. Educational Studies. 39, 260-282 Wan,G. F. & Gut, D. M. (2008).Media Use by Chinese and U.S. Secondary Students: Implications for Media Literacy Education. Theory Into Practice, 47, 178–185

Author Information

Hui Zhang (presenting / submitting)
VUB
Education department
Brussel
Chang Zhu (presenting)
Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Belgium

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.