Young people’s attitudes towards school and PE in England: Findings from the ‘You, School and PE’ Survey
Author(s):
Rachel Sandford (presenting / submitting) Rebecca Duncombe (presenting) John Morris Donna Maddox
Conference:
ECER 2012
Format:
Paper

Session Information

18 SES 08, Parallel Paper Session

Parallel Paper Session

Time:
2012-09-20
09:00-10:30
Room:
FFL - Salón de Grados
Chair:
Karin Redelius

Contribution

This paper reports findings from a survey undertaken with Secondary-aged pupils (11-18 years) in England and discusses students’ attitudes towards school and PE. In addition, it explores some of the ways in which young people believe PE, and their learning in PE, could be improved.  A number of studies have reported that adults often do not participate in physical activity because of negative physical education experiences during adolescence (Simons-Morton et al., 1987) and that enjoyment of physical education at school can be a precursor to lifelong physical activity (Carlson, 1995). Such findings are especially pertinent given that a number of research studies have found that physical activity levels drop throughout the teenage years (e.g. Brodersen et al., 2007) and that attitudes towards physical education/activity do, indeed, decline during this stage (e.g. Subramaniam & Silverman, 2007). Furthermore, Luke & Sinclair (1991) argue that, given these findings, attempts to understand students’ attitudes towards PE are important and can help teachers to improve their physical education programs, whilst Silverman and Subramaniam (1999) discuss the ways in which attitudes, whilst difficult to change, are indeed malleable. Given that attitudes can be changed, it certainly makes sense to understand more about what students do and do not like about their physical education lessons and it is not surprising that a number of studies have already been conducted in this area. For example, studies from within and outside of the UK have revealed that young people are more likely to have a favourable attitude towards PE if a variety of activities are offered (Rikard & Banville, 2006) and if the teacher is liked and behaves in a professional manner (Figley, 1985). Likewise, factors leading to alienation from PE have been identified as including boredom, repetition and a lack of meaningful work (Fox & Biddle, 1988) as well as an overly competitive class environment (Portman, 1992).

The research draws on social constructivist theories of learning, with their explicit focus on individuals’ active involvement in making sense of their social experiences through interactions with others and their environment (e.g. Kirk & MacDonald, 1998), to facilitate an understanding of the young people’s views of both their school and physical education lessons. Moreover, it draws upon broader theories of alienation and positive youth development (e.g. Carlson, 1995; Holt, 2008) to explain some of the specific findings around young people’s disengagement and disillusionment in relation to both physical education and the broader school context. In particular, these theories are perceived to be particularly useful in understanding the sense of meaningless and powerlessness expressed by some individuals within the survey, as well as providing a structure to frame a number of key recommendations for improved teaching practice.

 

Method

Young people in Secondary schools within England were asked (by their teachers) to complete an online survey and this was completed by 6531 pupils (52% were male and 48% were female) from 32 schools. The survey asked the young people to rate their attitudes towards school and PE (using a 5-point rating scale) and then to comment upon the good and bad things about learning in PE at their school through a number of open-ended questions. For the purposes of this paper, the quantitative data from all 32 schools were collated and underwent a descriptive analysis using SPSS to generate percentages and means. The qualitative responses from all surveys were collated and analysed thematically to draw out common responses and areas of interest. They were then grouped into a number of categories, similar to those used by Williams (2007) in her critique of teaching practice, to highlight pupil-related, teacher-related and context-related issues. Whilst the main incentive for schools to complete this survey was the production of individual case study reports (for schools to use as evidence) the teachers and pupils were also aware that a collated analysis would take place and they were assured that their anonymity would be maintained.

Expected Outcomes

The findings, in many ways, confirm those of previous research (as discussed above). For example, the majority of pupils agreed that they enjoyed PE lessons, but pupils also cited a lack of choice and variety of activities as a ‘bad’ thing about PE, identified their teachers (and certain teaching styles) as being both a good and bad thing about PE and highlighted the poor behaviour of others (in PE and in school) as being an issue contributing to dissatisfaction. Additionally, boys were, on the whole, more favourable towards PE and girls indicated that they were less likely to sustain participation in sport/physical activity beyond school. The fact that some findings are not new is significant in itself, as it indicates a lack of change within young people’s physical activity experiences. Thus, much of the discussion focuses on ‘change’ and, informed by constructivist theories of learning as well as the positive youth development literature, a number of recommendations are put forward. In addition, the principles of high quality teaching and learning (as outlined by the DFES & DCMS, 2004) are explored in relation to students’ attitudes to learning in PE and as a means of challenging pupil disengagement and alienation.

References

Brodersen, N.H., Steptoe, A., Boniface, D.R. and Wardle, J. (2007) `Trends in Physical Activity and Sedentary Behaviour in Adolescence: Ethnic and Socioeconomic Differences', British Journal of Sports Medicine, 41(3), 140-4. Carlson, T.B. (1995) We Hate Gym: Student Alienation From Physical Education, Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 14, 467-477. DFES & DCMS (2004). High Quality PE and Sport for Young People. Nottingham: DFES Publications. Figley, G.E. (1985) Determinants of Attitudes Toward Physical Education, Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 4, 229-240. Fox, K., & Biddle, S. (1988). The Child Perspective physical education: part 2. Children’s participation motives, British Journal of Physical Education, 19, 79-82. Holt, N. (Ed) 2008. Positive youth development through sport. London: Routledge. Kirk, D., & MacDonald, D. (1998). Situated learning in Physical Education, Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 17, 376-387. Luke, M.D. & Sinclair, G.D. (1991) Gender Differences in Adolescents’ Attitudes Toward School Physical Education, Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 11, 31-46. Portman, P.A. (1995) Who is having fun in physical education classes? Experience of six grade students in elementary and middle schools, Journal of Teaching in physical Education, 14, 445-453. Rikard, G. & Banville, D. (2006) High School Student attitudes about physical education, Sport, Education and Society, 11 (4), 385-400. Silverman, S. & Subramaniam, P.R. (1999) Student Attitude Toward Physical Education and Physical Activity: A Review of Measurement Issues and Outcomes, Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 19, 97-125. Simons-Morton, B.G., O’Hara, N.M., Simons-Morton, D.G. & parcel, G.S. (1987) Children and fitness: A public health perspective. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 58, 295-302. Subramaniam, P. & Silverman, S. (2007) Middle School students’ attitudes toward physical education, Teaching and Teacher Education, 23(5), 602-11. Williams, A. (2007) Problematising Physical Education Practice: Pupil Experience as a Focus for Reflection, European Journal of Physical Education, 1(1-2), 19-35.

Author Information

Rachel Sandford (presenting / submitting)
Loughborough University
School of Sport, Exercise & Health Sciences
Loughborough
Rebecca Duncombe (presenting)
Institute of Youth Sport, Loughborough University, United Kingdom
Institute of Youth Sport, Loughborough University, United Kingdom
Youth Sport Trust, United Kingdom

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.