Social Aspects in Primary Aged Children’s Collaborative Digital Video Production
Conference:
ECER 2012
Format:
Paper

Session Information

06 SES 10, Learning With Digital Media In and Out Of School

Parallel Paper Session
Chair: Yvonne Fritze

Time:
2012-09-20
15:30-17:00
Room:
FCT - Aula 2
Chair:
Yvonne Fritze

Contribution

The world of media around us has changed. Our children, spending more and more time with the screen media outside school, have got used to media contents that are now visual and interactive (Strasburger et al. 2009). The gap between generations, as far as media is concerned, is seen as a challenge in school: it is prominent that many students are not interested in studying by means of traditional media. Consistently, few teachers are willing to meet the challenge to utilise contemporary media and technology in instruction. (Pohjola & John­son 2009) Thus, more effort is needed to apply modern media texts in formal school education.

Digital video (DV) production integrated in collaborative pedagogical settings has turned out to be a participative pedagogical tool (Hakkarainen 2007; Kearney & Schuck 2006) exhilarating and motivating learners regardless of age, gender or abilities, whether they are interested in tasks promoting practical skills or knowledge of technology (Palmgren-Neuvonen & Kumpulainen 2011; Reid et al. 2002). Instead of teacher-centered instruction, collective discursive activities in peer groups empower learners for more equal relations in the classroom. Moviemaking affords excellent conditions for children to learn critical media literacies (Laitinen 2007) that are regarded as part of crucial 21st century skills (Voogt & Pareja Roblin 2010).

The Future School Research Center (FSR) conducted a large study on collaborative DV projects in a Finnish primary school. The 4th and 5th graders (N=57) produced DV movies in three different kinds of projects, working in small groups. The aim of the study was to examine how the process of DV construction endorses collaboration and interaction in peer groups among primary school students. In addition, it was of interest to investigate how discursive activities promote children’s negotiation and collaboration skills. Nevertheless, the creative content production projects with collective activities offered the FSR a fruitful opportunity to investigate the dynamics and development of the peer groups.

For the study reported in this paper the following research questions were formulated:

  • What kind of interaction emerges in the DV production projects among the small peer groups?
  • What kind of development phases are composed in the DV producers’ small peer groups?

The continuous development of working life requires new kinds of competencies including good group and networking skills. The present study is based on Vygotsky’s (1978) socio-cultural theories of learning, the contemporary conceptions of collaborative learning (Dillenbourg 1999), and shared meaning (Stahl 2006). We can learn a great deal from and with each other. But for children, forming a group and working collaboratively may be challenging at times. According to Tuckman (1965), group development tends to follow phases: forming, storming, norming, performing, and adjourning. In the present study, we aimed to investigate the interaction and group development among primary school children in activities around DV technology in order to establish the critical phases for successful collaboration.

Method

Students, aged 10 - 12 years, made DV movies in small groups during the three DV projects. Both qualitative and quantitative methods were employed to collect data. This paper reports preliminary findings emerged from qualitative interaction analysis of the video data recorded in the sessions along the DV production process. Approximately 50 hours of video recordings were examined and annotated, 10 hours of which were taken under deeper analysis by means of QSR NVivo. From the numerous fundamental interaction analysis methods related to interaction and group dynamics, we chose the analytic methodology introduced by Kumpulainen and Wray (2002). The method includes three dimensions: functional analysis of verbal interaction, and analysis of social and cognitive processing. Under this analysis six sessions were coded to speakers and categories describing forms of interaction. Significant episodes were transcribed in detail and annotations for multimodal expressions were added. Three of the coded ones were consecutive sessions of a specific 4th grade group, while the other three were of various 4th and 5th grade groups. This paper reports interaction of the specific 4th grade group, describing how the five members brainstorm, plan and storyboard their collective DV movie.

Expected Outcomes

The aim of the ongoing deeper analysis is to investigate how interaction of small groups and construction of shared meaning develop over time in the DV production projects. The groups discussed in an enthusiastic manner and constructed the storyboard of their joint media representation actively, trying to build intersubjectivity in their discussions. The initial findings show that the specific 4th grade group being examined in detail underwent the phases of group development model proposed by Tuckman. The recordings suggest that the rewarding moments of shared understanding contributed to collaboration in the group. Nevertheless, it seemed challenging to integrate the differing discourses of the male and female members into a collective movie. Further, the video recordings reflect occurrence of little argumentation in the recorded discussions. It is obvious that the young producer group had modest strategy skills on how to construct the shared meaning. To conclude, it is evident that teaching primary school children discussion, negotiation, and argumentation skills is of great importance. This may be worth taking into consideration as far as lower grades’ students are concerned. Collaborative settings do not automatically improve interaction skills and collaboration strategies, but teachers are still needed in a guiding and scaffolding role.

References

Dillenbourg P. (1999). What do you mean by collaborative learning? In P. Dillenbourg (Ed.) Collaborative learn-ing: Cognitive and Computational Approaches (pp.1-19). Oxford: Elsevier. Hakkarainen, P. (2007). Promoting meaningful learning through the integrated use of digital videos. University of Lapland. Kearney, M. & Schuck, S. (2006). Spotlight on authentic learning: Student developed digital video projects. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 22(2), 189-208. Kumpulainen, K. & Wray, D. (Eds.) (2002). Classroom interaction and social learning. From theory to practice. London: Routledge Falmer. Laitinen, S. (2007). Kuvaa ymmärtämään – visuaalisen mediatajun ja -taidon opettamisesta. In H. Kynäslahti, R. Kupiainen & M. Lehtonen (Eds.) Näkökulmia mediakasvatukseen. (pp. 61-72). Helsinki: Finnish Society on Media Education. Palmgren-Neuvonen, L. & Kumpulainen, K. (2011). Acquiring learning skills by making movies – DV production in mother tongue education. In Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2011 (pp. 1182-1189). Chesapeake, VA: AACE. Pohjola, K. & Johnson, E. (2009). Lasten mediakulttuuri ja koulu vuoropuheluun. Jyväskylä: Finnish Institute for Educational Research. University of Jyväskylä. Reid, M., Burn, A. & Parker, D. (2002). Evaluation report of the Becta digital video pilot project. British Film Institute. Retrieved October 7, 2009, from http://partners.becta.org.uk/page_documents/research/dvreport_241002.pdf. Stahl, G. (2006). Group cognition: Computer support for building collaborative knowledge. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Strasburger,V.C., Wilson, B.J. & Jordan, A.B. (2009). Children, Adolescent and the Media. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks (Calif.): Sage. Tuckman, B. W. (1965). Developmental sequence in small groups. Psychological Bulletin, 63, 384-399. Voogt, J., & Pareja Roblin, N. (2010). 21st century skills. Enschede: University of Twente. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. (M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman, Eds.). Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.

Author Information

Laura Palmgren-Neuvonen (presenting / submitting)
University of Oulu
Department of Educational Sciences and Teacher Education
University of Oulu
Oulu Teacher Training School, University of Oulu
Faculty of Education, University of Oulu

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.