Leadership for Learning in Ghana: Shared leadership improving pedagogy in basic education
Author(s):
Stephen Jull (presenting / submitting) Sue Swaffield John MacBeath
Conference:
ECER 2012
Format:
Paper

Session Information

26 SES 05 A, Educational Leadership

Parallel Paper Session

Time:
2012-09-19
11:00-12:30
Room:
FFL - Aula 8
Chair:
Simon Clarke

Contribution

This paper tells the story of developments in Ghana, West Africa under the aegis of the Centre for Commonwealth Education in Cambridge. The programme’s purpose is to work in collaboration with partners at the University of Cape Coast to support headteachers in adopting a more learning-centred approach to their role, and to help them address many of barriers which currently impede them from focusing on learning and generating a learning-centred dialogue with their staff, with their students and with parents. There are many obstacles to teaching and learning in Ghanaian schools, and yet there is no structured pre-service preparation for those who are expected to lead and support teaching and learning. Headteachers tend to be appointed on the basis of their teaching experience and seniority. Once in post, training is typically very limited: in the five year period 2002-2007 75% of headteachers in Ghana had received less than a week’s training. What professional development there has been to assist headteachers in their roles has typically been on an ad hoc basis associated with foreign aid initiatives. Headteachers tend to view their role as custodians, guarding resources such as text books, maintaining registers of teachers’ attendance and punctuality, and checking lesson plans. Few view themselves as leaders or have established the link between their headship role and pupil learning. The need to build leadership capacity among headteachers and the lack of leadership preparation have been identified as key issues in improving education in Ghana. A focus on learning and dialogue are two of the five key principles of the Leadership for Learning model, developed through a three year seven country research study. These principles are tested, applied and refined in the Ghanaian context.  Political developments, the colonial legacy and decolonization provide the backdrop to the narrative.

Method

Headteachers throughout the Ghana are participating in a programme devised and facilitated by fifteen Ghanaian educators known as Professional Development Leaders, who have been prepared for this role by working with colleagues at the University of Cambridge Faculty of Education, first at a workshop in Ghana and then at a summer school in Cambridge. The work takes as its theoretical framework the Leadership for Learning principles and framework developed through the Carpe Vitam Leadership for Learning project. In the early stages of the initiative it was essential to ascertain the current situation and to consider the context in which the development was to take place. Data gathered includes qualitative feedback gathered via a semi structured questionnaire interviews of 125 headteachers. Quantitative outcomes data were also gathered providing descriptive statistical data regarding inter-school readiness for change.

Expected Outcomes

Data suggests a number of important implications for improved pedagogy, namely: (1) Professional development opportunities through regular staff meetings and consultations with 'critical friends', (2) Learner-centred activities prevalent, calling on collaborative pedagogical processes relying on group learning, (3) Extension of benefits beyond the bounds of the classroom to include parents and community partners, (4) Structural changes observed, resulting in increased time spent in active learning, (5) Positive change regarding perspectives about learning, accompanied by improvements in academic performance, (6) Improved outcomes in literacy curriculum, notably improvements and enjoyment in reading, (7) Improved pedagogy, and communications within the classroom and across the school, and (8) Increased parental involvement, and expressed willingness to visit the school. These outcomes are explored within the context of sustainability and prospective next steps for Ghanaian education.

References

Antwi, M. (1992) Education, Society and Development in Ghana. Accra, Unimax Publishers Limited. Bridges, D. (2008) ‘Education and the Possibility of Outsider Understanding’, The Terry McLaughlin Memorial Lecture, International Network of Philosophers of Education Biennial Conference, University of Kyoto. Coe, C. (2005) Dilemmas of Culture in African Schools: Youth, Nationalism and the Transformation of Knowledge, Chicago, University of Chicago Press. Crawford, G. (2010) Decentralisation and struggles for basic rights in Ghana: opportunities and constraints, The International Journal of Human Rights 14 (1), 92–125. Eisner, E. (1991) The Enlightened Eye: Qualitative inquiry and the enhancement of educational practice. New York, Macmillan. GES, CET, UCC (2009) Memorandum of Understanding: Basic School Headteacher Capacity Strengthening in Leadership for Learning. MOU made in Accra, Ghana, on 22 July 2009. MacBeath, J. and Dempster, N. (2009) Connecting Leadership and Learning: Principles for Practice. London, Routledge. McWilliam, H.O.A. and Kwamena-Poh, M.A. (1975) The Development of Education in Ghana. London, Longman. Mefum-Mensah, O. (2004) Empowermenr or impairment? Involving traditional communities in school management, International Review of Education, 50: 141-155. Obeng, C.S. (2002) Home was Uncomfortable, School Was Hell: A Confessionalist-Ethnographic Account of Belief Systems and Socio-Educational Crises in the Schooling of Ghanaian Rural Girls, Nova Science Publishers, New York Sefa Dei, G. and Opini, B. M. (2007) Schooling in the context of difference: the challenge of post-colonial education in Ghana in D. Thiessen and A. Cook-Sather (Eds.), International Handbook of Student Experience in Elementary and Secondary School, 463–491, Rotterdam, Springer. Segura, C.C. ( 2009) Lost in Translation: Why the Structures of Formal Schooling are not Translating in Rural Ghana, Thesis submitted to International Development Studies, University of Toronto. http://hdl.handle.net/1807/17583 Thiong’o, N. (1986) Decolonising the Mind: The Politics of Language in African Literature, New York, Heinemann

Author Information

Stephen Jull (presenting / submitting)
Centre for Commonwealth Education, University of Cambridge
Education
Cambridge
Centre for Commonwealth Education, University of Cambridge, United Kingdom
Centre for Commonwealth Education, University of Cambridge, United Kingdom

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.