Session Information
04 SES 05.5 PS, General Poster Session
General Poster Session
Contribution
Research Questions:
What do teachers think about inclusion and their leadership in the classroom? – And how do they practice inclusion and their leadership?
Which kinds of inclusive teaching strategies can be identified?
How can inclusive teaching strategies be developed?
Description:
My research project investigates the way teachers think about and work with inclusion and their leadership in the classroom and how they see the relationships between their curricular choices and pupil participation.
Also the project investigates how teachers’ inclusive teaching strategies and competencies can be qualified.
The assumption underlying the research project is that to a large extent inclusive teaching strategies depend on an increased focus on the choices made by the teachers before, during and after their teaching, and that a conscious framing and development of these choices will lead to an increase of pupil participation.
Data comes from three teacher teams, eleven teachers, and from three different schools in the same municipality.
At the ECER conference the presentation shortly introduces the research design and subsequently focuses on the analysis from the first phase concerning the teachers practice and thoughts regarding inclusion and teaching strategies. Here observations, interviews and the teachers’ logbooks provide the basis of the presented maps – situational maps, maps over social worlds and positional maps. The maps are developed with inspiration from the theory and method by Adele Clarkes Situational Analysis – Grounded Theory after the Postmodern Turn
Method
Expected Outcomes
References
Booth, T. & M. Ainscow. (2011). Index for inclusion. Bristol, UK: CSIE. Brinkmann, S. (2007). Could Interviews Be Epistemic. Qualitative inquiry, 2007, p. 1116-1138. Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing Grounded Theory. London: SAGE. Clarke, A. (2005). Situational Analysis - Grouned Theory After the Postmodern Turn. London: SAGE. Dyson, A. (1999). Inclusion and inclusions: theories and discourses in inclusive education. I H. D. Garner, World yearbook of Education 1999 Inclusive Education. Kogan Page. Hammersley, M. (2010). Methodology; who needs it? Los Angeles: SAGE. Hartmann, J. (2005). Funderet Teori. København: Alinea. Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning - a synthesis of over 800 meta- analyses relating to achievement. London: Routledge. Hiim, H. (2010). Pedagogisk Aksjonsforskning - tilnærminger, eksempler og kunnskapsfilosofisk grundlag. Oslo: Gyldendal Akademisk. Järvinen, M. &.-M. (2005). Kvalitative metoder i et interaktionistisk perspektiv. København: Hans Reitzels Forlag. Madsen, B. m. (2010). Aktionslæringens DNA. Århus: VIASystime. McNiff, J. o. (2006). Action Research. London: SAGE. Mitchell, D. (2008). What Really Works in Special and Inclusive Education. London: Routledge. Nielsen, B. S. (2010). Aktionsforskning. I S. o. Brinkmann, Kvalitative metoder - en grundbog (s. 97-210). København: Hans Reitzels Forlag. Nordenbo, S. E. (2008). Lærerkompetanser og elevers læring i barnehage og skole. København: DPU. Tiller, T. (1999). Aksjonslæring - forskende partnerskap i skolen. Kristiansand: Høyskoleforlaget. Wilber, K. (1997). An integral theory of consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies 4, No. 1, s. 77-92.
Search the ECER Programme
- Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
- Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
- Search for authors and in the respective field.
- For planning your conference attendance you may want to use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference
- If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.