Session Information
05 SES 05.5 PS, General Poster Session
General Poster Session
Contribution
Recent years school violence is a serious social problem all over the world. Possible reasons explaining this high frequency of school violence include the drastic biological and social changes experienced by adolescents. Also anti-social behaviors are other risk factors about school violence. According to the researchers with the rapid increase in electronic and online communication traditional bullying is no longer limited to schools. Attention is growing toward risk of adolescents to become victims of aggression perpetrated by peers with increasing usage of new technology and socail media such as; facebook, myspace, twitter etc. The nature of new technology makes it possible for cyberbullying to ocur more secretly, to spread more rapidly and to preserve easily. Considering that many internet users are socially isolated and some may even look for peer support on the internet that incites them to act out in violence against their bullies researchers argued that there is a link between cyber-bullying and anti –social behaviors. Cyber-Bullying which is a new form of traditional bullying has become more common among adolescents and affecting students. The aim of the current study is to examine the overlap among targets of and similarities between cyber- bullying and anti-social behaviors of adolescents.
Method
Expected Outcomes
References
1. Baker, Ö.E. & Kavşut, F. (2007) Eurasion Journal Of Educational Research, Vol. 27, pp: 31–42. 2. Deheu, F. ; Bolman, C & Völlink, T (2008) Cyberbullying: Youngsters ‘ Experiences And Parental Perception. Cyber Psychology & Behavior, Vol. 1, No: 2 pp: 217–223. 3. Li, Q. (2006). Cyberbullying In Schools: A Research Of Gender Differences. School Psychology International, Vol. 27, No.2, pp: 157–170. 4. Mitchell, K.J. ; Ybarra, M & Finkelhor, D. (2007). The Relative Importance Of Online Victimization In Understanding Deppression, Delinquency and Substance Use. Child Maltreatment, Vol. 12, No.4, pp: 314–324 5. Patchin, J.W. & Hinduja, S. (2006). Bullies Move Beyond The School Yard: Youth Violence And Juvenile Justice, Vol. 4. No. 2. pp: 18–169. 6. Sharpies, M.; Graber, R. ; Harrison, C. & Logant, K. ( 2009). E-Safety And Web 2,0 For Children Aged 11–16. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, vol. 25. pp: 70–84. 7. Subrahmanyam, K & Greenfield, P. (2008) Online Communication and Adolescents Relationships. The Future of Children. Vol. 18, No. 1, pp: 121–146. 8. Volkenburg, P. & Peter, J. (2007) Preadolescents and Adolescents’ Online Communication And Their Closeness to Friends. Developmental Psychology, Vol.43, No.2. pp: 267–277. 9. Volkenburg, P, Peter, J. & Schouten, A. ( 2006). Friend Networking Sites And Their Relationship To Adolescents’ Well-Being And Social Self-Esteem. Cyberpsychology & Behavior. Vol.19, No, 5,pp:584–590. 10. Wolak, J. Mitchell, K. J & Finkelhor, D. ( 2003). Escaping or Connecting? Characteristics of Youth Who From Close Online Relationships, Journal Of Adolescence. Vol. 26, No, 1. pp:105- 119.
Search the ECER Programme
- Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
- Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
- Search for authors and in the respective field.
- For planning your conference attendance you may want to use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference
- If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.