Students’ Attitudes Towards Wikipedia as a Knowledge Source in School
Author(s):
Marte Blikstad-Balas (presenting / submitting)
Conference:
ECER 2013
Format:
Paper

Session Information

27 SES 08 C, Students Attitudes and Motivations

Paper Session

Time:
2013-09-12
09:00-10:30
Room:
A-207
Chair:
Brian Hudson

Contribution

Norway is an interesting and important case in Europe when it comes to access to both computers and Internet in a school setting, because the country has the highest number of Internet access both at home and at school among the OECD-countries, and digital skills are incorporated systematically in the national curriculum. It is the first country in Europe to have a curriculum explicitly based on digital skills, but the use of ICT is an important educational topic and goal across Europe. Several studies have emphasized that access to technology itself will not provide enhanced teaching or change in teaching practices (Cuban 2001, Madden, Ford et al. 2005, Livingstone 2009, Blikstad-Balas 2012), therefore it is crucial to investigate how the use of ICT is impacting education.

Having Internet connection in the classroom context, adds a tremendous amount of possible new texts to the educational setting. It also challenges the hegemony of what is historically the number one example of a typical institutionalized school text, namely the subject textbook. Even with this enormous variety of potential sources of information on the web, one digital source of information is often the clearly preferred choice for students, and that is the peer produced encyclopedia Wikipedia – increasingly popular globally, and by far the most visited on educational and reference material (Raine and Tancer 2007). Several studies suggest that web users do not always look for the best potential information (Metzger 2007, Rieh and Hilligoss 2008, Fallis 2008, Lim 2009), which makes it important to investigate how students who use Wikipedia  relate to Wikipedia as a source of knowledge. What motivates the students’ use of Wikipedia and how Wikipedia is becoming a central part of school literacy is also important to address.

 This paper presents a study on students’ literacy practices in upper secondary school aiming to describe students’ attitudes towards Wikipedia as a knowledge source in school tasks. The study is framed within the theories of New Literacy Studies ( Street 2003, Gee 2004, Barton 2007) where literacy is seen as a social practice based on texts. The paper specifically explores how the sampled students relate to Wikipedia in a school setting and how they describe their literacy practices where Wikipedia plays a role. A focal issue is what counts as knowledge for the students across school subjects, and what the students consider to be the main advantages and disadvantages of Wikipedia. The main purpose of the present paper thus is to present findings on attitudes the students have towards Wikipedia as a textual basis for school literacy.


Method

The empirical basis of the present study is a quantitative survey named “Wikipedia in a school context”, conducted at eight Norwegian schools in 2012. In each school one class was sampled, and the total number of respondent is 168 students, all in their final year of upper secondary school. The survey consists of both “multiple choice” questions and open-ended questions. All questions address Wikipedia in a school context. In the “multiple choice” questions the students are asked to express to what extent they agree to different claims about Wikipedia and how often they do different activities involving Wikipedia. Classical Lickert-scales (Crocker & Algina 1986:79) are used in the “multiple choice” questions. In the two open ended questions, the students are encouraged to explain what they consider to be the main advantages and main disadvantages of Wikipedia in a school context. In addition to the survey, a sample of students participated in semi structured qualitative interviews, where the goal was to obtain more detailed elaborations on the role Wikipedia plays in the literacy practices of these students.

Expected Outcomes

The study confirms extensive use of Wikipedia, and in line with international research the study also confirms that for a majority of the students Wikipedia is their preferred choice of informational source. The students perceive Wikipedia as more relevant and to the-point than their subject textbook, and prefer using Wikipedia whenever they can. However, the students also describe teacher dissatisfaction with Wikipedia as a central disadvantage of Wikipedia in a school setting. The majority of students do not perceive Wikipedia as an intended school source for information, thus the present stydy illustrates a didactical challenge: the students’ preferred knowledge source for school tasks is a knowledge source they are not intended or in many cases not allowed to use. Hence their literacy practices change depending on whether they are working on informal or formal tasks, as Wikipedia predominates the informal literacy practices and is absent in the formal literacy practices. Even though this study is conducted in Norway, the implications of the findings are relevant in a discussion of European education.

References

Barton, D. (2007). Literacy: an introduction to the ecology of written language. Malden, Mass.: Blackwell Pub. Blikstad-Balas (2012) Digital Literacy in Upper Secondary School – What Are Students Using Their Laptops for During Teacher Instruction? Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, vol. 2. Crocker, L. & Algina, J. (1986). Introduction to classical and modern test theory. Fort Worth, Tex.: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston. Cuban, L. (1983). "How did teachers teach, 1890-1980." Theory into Practice, 22(3), 159-165. Fallis, D. (2008). "Toward an epistemology of Wikipedia." Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(10), 1662-1674. Gee, J. P. (2004). Situated language and learning: a critique of traditional schooling. London, Routledge. Lim, S. (2009). "How and why do college students use Wikipedia?" Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(11), 2189-2212. Livingstone, S. M. (2009). Children and the Internet: Great expectations, challenging realities. Cambridge: Polity. Madden, A., et al. (2005). "Using the internet in teaching: The views of practicioners (a survey of the views of secondary school teachers in Sheffield, UK." British Journal of Education Technology 36(2): 255 -280. Metzger, M. J. (2007). "Making sense of credibility on the Web: Models for evaluating online information and recommendations for future research." Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(13), 2078-2091. Raine, L. & Tancer, B. (2007). Wikipedia users. Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project. Retrieved from http://pewinternet.org/Reports/2007/Wikipedia-users.aspx Rieh, S. Y. & Hilligoss, B. (2007). College students' credibility judgments in the information seeking process. In M. J. Metzger & A. J. Flanagin (Eds), Digital media, youth, and credibility (pp. 49-72). Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. Street, B. (2003). "What's "new" in New Literacy Studies? Critical approaches to literacy in theory and practice." Current Issues in Comparative Education 5(2).

Author Information

Marte Blikstad-Balas (presenting / submitting)
University of Oslo
Department of Teacher Education and School Research
Oslo

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.