How do adolescents perceive the participatory potential of the Internet? An study on teens’ attitudes towards participation and content creation.
Author(s):
Maria Ranieri (presenting / submitting) Alessia Rosa (presenting)
Conference:
ECER 2013
Format:
Paper

Session Information

06 SES 03, Younger Media Consumers

Paper Session

Time:
2013-09-10
17:15-18:45
Room:
D-406
Chair:
Maria Ranieri

Contribution

Over the last years, there has been an increasing emphasis on the potential of the Internet as a means of increasing young people’s participation (Bennett, 2007; Pettingill, 2007). The Internet has been recognised as a technology enabling participatory aptitudes and facilitating content sharing and creation. The raise of Web 2.0 and social network sites have also been viewed as driver for young people’s participation: from discussing in a web forum to creating content in a wiki, from sharing useful resources to using information in every field of life – education, politics, economy, society. Indeed, the new digital media are seen offering young people opportunities to undertake participative roles with positive implications on the development of their abilities (empowerment): at the individual level (development of competences, exposure to different points of view), at the community level (the richness of different points of view and sharing of information), and at the social level (civic involvement and democratic participation). According to Jenkins et al. (2006), who focused on digital technologies and «participative culture», the participation in projects involving collaborative knowledge-building can offer young people the opportunity to develop new abilities for the exercise of full citizenship and even for professional life. In addition, the opportunities provided by the Internet can support young people in the political and social action (Bennett, 2007), thus promoting new forms of civic engagement (Pettingill, 2007).

However, some studies have questioned the enthusiasm in the participatory power of the Internet (Selwyn & Gorard, 2003). For example, Livingstone et al. (2005) found that interactive and creative uses of the Internet are encouraged by the very experience of using the Internet but that visiting civic websites depends primarily on demographic factors (with older, middle-class girls being most likely to visit these sites). In a similar vein, Hargittai and Walejko (2008) found that despite new opportunities to engage in such distribution of content, relatively few people are taking advantage of these recent developments.

Therefore, though the Internet might seem to have a great potential, the research on online participatory culture is still at the beginning. The aim of this study is to add a ‘piece of evidence’ on these issues through the investigation of teens’ attitudes towards online participation and content creation. In particular, the study aimed at providing a conceptual representation of the notion of participation within the network, and developing and testing a specific instrument to assess adolescents perception of the participatory potential of the Internet.

Method

Prior to developing the assessment instrument, four levels of online social “proximity” (crowd, completely public; network, semi-public; community, semi-private, and collaborative, completely private) were identified according to criteria such openness vs closeness; strong ties vs weak ties; active vs passive involvement. For each level three or four indicators were defined with corresponding items. The items were formulated using an adapted version of the “telling stories” technique, developed by Marradi (2005) and revised by Trinchero (2011) to explore people’s values. “Stories” were used as interviewing tools to investigate the position of respondents on the four mentioned dimensions. To test the instrument a group of “telling stories” was administered to a sample of secondary school students aged 16-18. Each "Story" was made up of two sections: a) a verbally reported episode presenting a situation that usually implies a controversial choice; b) a direct question inviting the respondent to express his or her reactions on the narrated episode. Subsequently, a focus group was carried out to validate the instrument and promote its applicability to other educational contexts. To examine factors influencing teens’ participation, it was administered a questionnaire on the socio-cultural background, digital literacy and opportunities to use new media.

Expected Outcomes

The current study aimed at developing an assessment tool for online participation and exploring adolescents attitudes towards the potential of the Internet in terms of participation and content creation. To these purposes, we developed, administered and validated a specific tool based on the technique of “telling stories”. This approach should stimulate genuine reactions in the respondents that should make clearer their collocation on the conceptual dimension investigated: the participatory culture. Coherently with previous research, the study found adolescents’ limited participatory attitudes, especially in terms of content production and sharing, regardless of the socio-cultural context and family habits. Since online participatory skills belong to the domain of digital and media literacy, these results call for a stronger commitment of educational institutions towards the implementation of new media education projects. We believe that a media education project, based on adolescents’ actual perceptions, should influence the way young people perceive their own role in the new media landscape and should modify the way they look at works created by others.

References

Bennett, W. L., Changing Citizenship in the Digital Age, in L. W. Bennett (ed), Civic Life Online, Cambridge, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA 2007, pp. 1–24. Hargittai, E., & Walejko G. (2010). The Participation Divide: Content Creation and Sharing in the Digital Age. Information, Communication and Society, 11, 2, 239-256. Jenkins, H., Clinton, K., Purushotma, R., Robison, A. & Weigel, M. (2006). Confronting the Challenges of Participatory Culture: Media Education for the 21st Century. Chicago (IL): The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation. Livingstone, S., Bober, B., & Helsper, E. J. (2005). Active participation or just more information? Young people’s take-up of opportunities to act and interact on the Internet. Information, Communication & Society, 8, 3, September, 287–31. Marradi, A. (2005). Raccontar storie, Roma: Carocci. Pettingill, L. (2007). Engagement 2.0? How the New Digital Media Can Invigorate Civic Engagement. GoodWork Project Paper Series, 50, 2007. Selwyn, N., & Gorard, S. (2003). Reality bytes: examining the rhetoric of widening educational participation via ICT. British Journal of Educational Technology, 34, 2, 169–181. Trinchero, R., & Tordini, M. L.(2011). Responsabilità e disagio. Una ricerca empirica sugli adolescenti piemontesi. Milano: Franco Angeli.

Author Information

Maria Ranieri (presenting / submitting)
University of Florence
Educational Sciences and Psychology
Florence
Alessia Rosa (presenting)
University of Turin, Italy

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.