Session Information
01 SES 07 A, Teachers as Researchers
Paper Session
Contribution
Whilst a hierarchy of evidence has been defined for evidence-based practice with randomized- control trials constituting the “gold standard”, less attention has been given to exploring and acknowledging the role of the expert practitioner and the place of practice-based evidence. If practitioner wisdom is to be fully utilized and valued it must be rigorously defined and the processes through which it comes to influence practice identified. This paper reports on a study which is seeking to do that.
This project aimed to study the perceptions of early childhood intervention practitioners and researchers working in Australia and internationally and to determine their understanding of practice-based evidence. Specifically: 1) What characterizes the expert practitioner? 2) What makes their practice worth emulating? 3) What is meant by practice-based evidence? 4) Through what processes does expert practice inform intervention?; and 5) What weightings are given to “best evidence”, practitioner expertise and client values in determining practice?
Method
Expected Outcomes
References
Barkham, M. and Mellor-Clark, J. (2000) Rigour and relevance: The role of practice-based evidence in the psychological therapies. In N. Rowland, & S. Goss (eds.), Evidence-based Mental Health. London: Routledge. Betan, E. and Binder, J. (2010) Clinical Expertise in Psychotherapy: How Expert Therapists Use Theory in Generating Case Conceptualizations and Interventions. J Contemp Psychother 40:141–152. Dockrell, J. and Lunt, I. (2001) Naturalistic Decision-Making Task Processes in Multiprofessional Assessment of Disability. Journal of School Psychology, Vol. 39, No. 6, pp. 499-519. Dreyfus, H. and Dreyfus, S. (2005) Expertise in real world contexts. Organization Studies 26: 779-92. Dybicz, P. (2004) An Inquiry Into Practice Wisdom. Families in Society 85(2): 197-203. Edmondson, R., Pearce, J. and Woerner, M. (2009) Wisdom in clinical reasoning and medical practice. Theor Med Bioeth 30:231–247. Edwards, R. and Nicoll, K. (2006) Expertise, competence and reflection in the rhetoric of professional development. British Educational Research Journal 32(1): 115-31. Ericsson, K., Charness, N., Hoffman, R., and Feltovich, P. (2006) The Cambridge handbook on expertise and expert performance. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Newman, D., Kellett, S. and Beail, N. (2003) From research and development to practice-based evidence: clinical governance initiatives in a service for adults with mild intellectual disability and mental health needs. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research 47(1): 68. Orme, L. and Maggs, C. (1993) Decision making in clinical practice: how do expert nurses make decisions? Nurse Education Today 13: 270–6. Overholser, J. (2010) Clinical Expertise: A Preliminary Attempt to Clarify Its Core Elements. J Contemp Psychother (2010) 40:131–139. Schlosser, R. and Sigafoos, J. (2009) Referring to clinical expertise and to client perspectives as ‘‘evidence:’’ Merits and perils. Evidence-based Communication Assessment and Intervention 3(3), 131–135.
Search the ECER Programme
- Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
- Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
- Search for authors and in the respective field.
- For planning your conference attendance you may want to use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference
- If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.