Family From A Student's Perspective
Author(s):
Tanja Pavlič (presenting / submitting)
Conference:
ECER 2013
Format:
Paper

Session Information

ERG SES G11, Students, Teachers and Pedagogy in Education

Paper Session

Time:
2013-09-10
09:00-10:30
Room:
A-206
Chair:
Martin Goy

Contribution

The variety of family types and the creation of constant new circumstances of family life is a reality. Individuals choose their own paths. Due to rapid changes, diverse paths and family life courses, the family is more and more difficult to define.

 

The definition of families is expanding from the traditional family structure to more diverse family structures. Diverse family structures are families made up of diverse individuals or relationships that structurally differ from the traditional (married mother and father with biological children) family. The family definition is important because it acts prescriptively. It is the reflection of moral ideological representations and social political acting. “What is accepted in the society by the majority as moral, and thus, normative, is usually rewarded by social political measures and vice versa” (Rener et al., 2006: 14).

Beside the statistic, sociological definitions of the family, there are the definitions that include the individuals’ needs being met in it, or the field of individual expressiveness, or the emotional background and shelter. Current definitions point out the meaning of the family's self-perception that is not based only on formal or blood ties. Thus, in the past, the broadest definition of the family was given by Coote (1990: 9) who argues that “in the real life, ‘the family’ means different things to different people – to any of them something compatible with his or her personal experience”.

 

Personal satisfaction derives from the quality of family life, and not from its type. Instead of the family structure, we should consider the relationships that affect favourably a child's development: mutual co-operation, trust, connection, warmth, security and care, emotional and psychological security.

Students can come from more or less secure, accepting learning environments. They can originate from culturally and ethically different social environments, from diverse families. They can come across changes in family life in their close environment, and that can have more or less positive consequences. That is why it is important to create the inclusive environment in which an individual is accepted.

 

Apart from the fact that we pay attention to teachers' conceptions, teaching and learning approaches, empathy skills in dealing with students from diverse families, we are interested in a student's conceptions of family in general and their experiencing of their own family.

 

In the paper, we want to find out how students define the notion of a family and how they experience the family. We posed these research questions: what do students associate the word family with, how do students define the family, what family types do students know, what do students like to do together with the family, and when do students do not feel all right in their family. We wanted students not only to express their own view on the family, but that they express themselves creativity as well.

Method

The research will be based on a descriptive and non-experimental method of empirical research. For the empirical part, we will use a quantitative research method, the open type of a questionnaire. We will gather data by the use of a questionnaire that we will create, and we will process the answers to open questions. The students will answer them during the lessons with their class teachers. The students will be informed about the questionnaire results. 280 students of the eighth and ninth grade, 13 to 15 years old, from four randomly chosen schools of the Coast-Karst Region in Slovenia, will be included in the research. The questionnaire completion will be in progress from February to April 2013. The data gathered by the questionnaires will be analysed, coded and the meaning of certain parts of the text will be decoded. We will also analyse the differences in answers depending on sex, urban and rural environment, and the family type students originate from. We will categorise and classify the data. We will identify, compare and interpret the themes, and organise them in categories. Classified data material will be described and interpreted appropriately. A final study will be prepared on the data analysis.

Expected Outcomes

We can expect that students define and experience the family differently. We can estimate that apart from the knowledge of a family, answers will very likely include personal experiences and emotional attitudes towards the family. We also expect that there will be differences in answers among students depending on the family type in which they live. But we do not expect important differences in the answers by the students of different sexes, or the ones from the rural or urban environment. The research will represent support to qualitative studies from the area of family conceptions and will contribute new ideas in the European context of family diversity. But most importantly, the research will help the conception of the family in the European Union and broader, where this theme is already present.

References

Beck, Ulrich, Beck-Gernsheim, Elisabeth (1996). Individualizacija in »tveganje svobode«: perspektive in nasprotje k subjektu usmerjene sociologije. Teorija in praksa, Vol. 33, No. 5, 817–838. Coote, Anna, Herman Harriet, Hewitt Patricia (1990). The family way: a new approach to policy-making. London: Institute for Public Policy Research. Luk-Fong, Pattie Yuk Yee (2011). Teachers' Stories of Children Coping with Family Situations and Family Changes: A Hong Kong Hybrid Case. Education 3-13, Vol. 39, No. 4, 415–427 Norris, Katherine E. L. (2010). Beyond the Textbook: Building Relationships between Teachers and Diversely-Structured Families. Multicultural Education, Vol. 1, 8 No.1, pp. 48-50. Pavlič, Tanja (2009). Enostarševske družine, magistrska naloga, Fakulteta za humanistične študije Koper. Rener, Tanja (et. al.) (2006). Družine in družinsko življenje v Sloveniji. Koper: Univerza na Primorskem, Znanstveno-raziskovalno središče. Založba Annales: Zgodovinsko društvo za južno Primorsko. Andrea, Rigg and Jan, Pryor (2007). Children’s Perceptions of Families: What Do They Really Think? Children& society, Vol. 21, 17–30. Skott-Myhre, Kathleen; Gibbs, Helen; Weima, Korinne (2012). Writing the Family :Women, Auto-ethnography and Family Work.Transgressions. Sense Publishers. Švab, Alenka (2001). Družina: Od modernosti k postmodernosti. Ljubljana: Znanstveno in publicistično središče. Willis, Mariam (2012). Insights: The Myth of the Traditional Family. Parenting for High Potential, Vol. 1, No. 5, 14–16.

Author Information

Tanja Pavlič (presenting / submitting)
University of Primorska
Faculty of Education Koper
Pobegi

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.