Research in Language Didactics and the Epistemological Construction of the Field
Conference:
ECER 2013
Format:
Paper

Session Information

27 SES 07 C, Issues in Foreign Language Didactics

Paper Session

Time:
2013-09-11
17:15-18:45
Room:
A-207
Chair:
Meinert Arnd Meyer

Contribution

Language Didactics is a growing field of research with its own identity and epistemology, which is visible in its object of study (language education, in its practices, processes, conditions and influencing factors), research aims and methods. Bearing in mind former characterisations of the field, Language Didactics is distinguished by a particular epistemological framework that puts in evidence its social and intervention nature. This means that research in Language Didactics comprises not only the description and analysis of phenomena, but also embraces a praxiological perspective in view of the guidance and transformation of language education (Alarcão 2010; Araújo e Sá 1999; Blanchet and Chardenet 2011; Gagné et al. 1989).

In more recent years, in the scope of a meta-scientific reflection (Blanchet 2011) about the development of Language Didactics in the Portuguese context, studies that intend to contribute to the state of the art of the area were carried out, also in tune with recent studies in the area of Language Education in other settings (Alarcão et al., 2004; Benson et al. 2009; Oswald and Plonsky 2010). One of such initiatives was the meta-analytical research project entitled Language Education: a meta-analytic study of the research in Portugal (EMIP/DL) (POCI; PPCDT/CED/59777/2004), which intended to trace the state of the art of the research in Language Didactics in Portugal between 1996 and 2006 (Alarcão and Araújo e Sá 2010). For that purpose, a documental corpus was organised (grey literature, empirical studies, and publications of an opinionative nature), and a database was created (http://emip.web.ua.pt).

Having this project as background, the study presented in this paper intends to analyse the research studies of the corpus of the project EMIP/DL that put forward implications directed to the research dimension, in order to identify and discuss the problems and challenges to the research in the field of Language Didactics. In addition, regarding that those publications can be considered illustrative of the discourses of researchers about the field, the study aims at disclosing the epistemological perspective about Language Didactics behind those discourses. Thus, our guiding questions are:

To what extend is research contributing to the epistemological development of the field?

To what kind of research epistemology do research studies point out in Language Didactics?

In that setting, what problems and challenges does research in Language Didactics face nowadays?

Method

In order to respond to our research questions, we resorted to sources deriving from the researchers in Language Didactics (Dufays 2010): the 113 published studies with empirical research collected in the context of the project EMIP/DL. Methodologically, the following steps were taken (Van der Maren 1996) to the constitution of the documental corpus for the present study: first, a documental analysis was carried out to the 113 studies in order to identify those that presented implications to the research domain of Language Didactics. 28 research studies were identified, which constitute the corpus for the present study; secondly, a content analysis was then carried out to the implications of the 28 articles, in order to identify and systematise the most striking future research avenues in Language Didactics and to reflect upon the epistemological construction of the field.

Expected Outcomes

As this is an on-going study, overall the findings point out that, in the Portuguese context, there is a prevalence of descriptive studies over more experimental ones (following the terminology of Gagné et al. 1989; see also Dufays 2010), and that the implications in the research sphere mainly refer to the need to develop more comprehensive and longitudinal studies, within a more multi-layered observation of phenomena and with the involvement of different contexts and actors. This would mean that the research in Language Didactics is mainly in a descriptive and comprehensive phase in terms of epistemology (De Ketele and Maroy 2010), displaying some difficulty in moving on to a more transformative phase. Such dominant characteristic of the research in the field seems to put forward limitations and frailties in view of two interconnected spheres: the epistemological one, considering the social and intervention dimension of Language Didactics, and the methodological one, which would require the articulation of hermeneutical with praxiological and evaluative investigations to respond to the first, and to contribute to social and educational transformation by means of the progress of both theory and practice.

References

Alarcão, I. (2010). A constituição da área disciplinar de Didáctica das Línguas em Portugal. Linguarum Arena (http://ler.letras.up.pt/uploads/ficheiros/8643.pdf). Alarcão, I. (coord.) et al. (2004). Percursos de consolidação da didáctica de línguas em Portugal. Investigar em Educação, 3, 237-302. Alarcão, I. & Araújo e Sá, M. H. (2010). Era uma vez…a Didáctica de Línguas em Portugal: enredos, actores e cenários de construção de conhecimento. Cadernos do LALE. Aveiro: UA (http://www.ua.pt/cidtff/lale/PageText.aspx?id=12936). Araújo e Sá, M. H. (1999). Investigação, formação e ensino: elementos para uma definição de espaços de diálogos possíveis. In Vieira, Branco, Marques, Silva, Moreira & Silva e Silva (Orgs.), Educação em línguas estrangeiras – investigação, formação e ensino. Actas do 1º ENDME (pp. 509-522). Braga: DME/IEPUM. Benson, Ph. et al. (2009). Qualitative Research in Language Teaching and Learning Journals, 1997–2006. The Modern Language Journal, 93 (1), 79–90. Blanchet, Ph. (2011). Nécessité d’une réflexion épistémologique. In Ph. Blanchet & P. Chardenet (dir.), op. cit. (pp.9-19). Blanchet, Ph. & Chardenet, P. (dir.) (2011). Guide pour la recherche en didactique des langues et des cultures.AUF/EAC. De Ketele, J.-M. & Maroy, Ch. (2010). Quels critères de qualité pour les recherches en éducation ? In L. Paquay, M. Crahay & J.-M. De Ketele (dir.), L’analyse qualitative en éducation. (pp.223-253). De boeck. Dufays, J.-L. (2010). Au Carrefour de trios méthodologies : une recherche en didactique de la lecture littéraire. In L. Paquay, M. Crahay & J.-M. De Ketele (dir.), L’analyse qualitative en éducation. (pp.147-168).De boeck. Gagné, G., Lazure, R., Sprenegr-Charolles, L. & Ropé, F. (1989). Recherches en didactique et acquisition du français langue maternelle. Tome 1. De Boeck. Oswald, F. & Plonsky, L. (2010). Meta-analysis in Second Language Research: Choices and Challenges. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 30, 85-110. Van der Maren, J.-M. (1996). Méthodes de recherche pour l’éducation. De Boeck & Larcier.

Author Information

Ana Sofia Pinho (presenting / submitting)
University of Aveiro, Research Centre “Didactics and Technology in Education of Trainers”, Portugal
University of Aveiro, Portugal
Education
Aveiro
University of Aveiro, Research Centre “Didactics and Technology in Education of Trainers”, Portugal
University of Aveiro, Research Centre “Didactics and Technology in Education of Trainers”, Portugal

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.