School Leadership Career Planning and Motivation
Author(s):
Stephan Gerhard Huber (presenting / submitting) Anna Kanape-Willingshofer (presenting)
Conference:
ECER 2013
Format:
Paper

Session Information

01 SES 08 A, Professional Development for School Leadership

Paper Session

Time:
2013-09-12
09:00-10:30
Room:
B-202
Chair:
David Hammond

Contribution

Until 2020 a third of all present Austrian teachers and school leaders will retire [1]. This holds true for Germany, too. This will make – since only teachers may become school principals according to law – recruitment of school leaders more difficult. Thus, the question ‘Who wants to become a principal and why?’ and “By what kind of means of HRM influence career planning?” become important issues for education authorities and training and development agencies.

This paper investigates first what motives influence applying for school leadership positions and second the use of multiple learning approaches and different modes and types of learning in the (continuous) professional development (PD) of school leaders, particularly the use of self-assessment and feedback, and what kinds of impact this have on career planning.

Method

This paper investigates the extent to which the self-assessment and feedback stimulates further learning and increases the motivation to engage in other learning opportunities. Furthermore, it explores to what extent participating in orientation programs including self-assessment and feedback has an impact on the participants’ career planning in terms of their intention to apply for a leadership position. In addition to surveys at the beginning, during, and after the program, a follow-up study was conducted using both quantitative and qualitative measures. The data collection was conducted in two phases. The first study focused on CPSM 1.0, the second on CPSM 2.0. The response rates were both satisfactory, RR of CPSM 1.0=66%, RR of CPSM 2.0=62%. The drop-out rates of the evaluation survey were low (for instance, for CPSM 2.0, 315 participants of the 492 invited participants started the evaluation, 305 participants finished it). Moreover, data on personal (e.g., sex, age, job satisfaction), situational (e.g., school type, school size) factors as well as person/situation interactions (e.g., perceived fairness of application process) in addition to application motives from an online questionnaire administered to Austrian teachers will be presented.

Expected Outcomes

An interactional approach taking different sources of influences into account is highly indicated when investigating career motives. In addition to these influential factors which were derived from an extensive review of literature a number of psychological aspects central to applying for leadership positions are assessed: general vocational interests; school-leadership-related occupational interests; evaluation of job aspects; leadership motivation. Based on this data the study will discuss (personal and situational) incentives and disincentives of becoming a school leader and propose some strategies for leadership sucession planning. The participants of preperational training program experience it as an enriching learning opportunity which promotes reflection and the motivation to gather more information about one’s own behavior in day-to-day practice, supports other learning opportunities, and promotes the participants’ professional competencies in areas they identify as beneficial to improving their practice. Moreover, participants change their career planning after participating in this PD program. They seem to have developed a more differentiated subjective theory of leadership and different leadership career possibilities or career steps to principalship than they had before participating in the program. Overall, there are more participants willing to apply for different types of leadership position at schools and in the school system.

References

Bergmann, C., & Eder, F. (2005). Allgemeiner Interessen-Struktur-Test mit Umwelt-Struktur-Test (UST-R) - Revision (AIST-R). Göttingen: Beltz Test GmbH. Felfe, J., Elprana, G., Gatzka, M., & Stiehl, S. (2012). FÜMO Hamburger Führungsmotivationsinventar. Göttingen: Hogrefe. Krammer, D., Huber, S., Demarle-Meusel, H., & Mayr J. (2012). FISM – Fragebogen zum Interesse an Schulmanagementaufgaben. Unveröffentlichtes Inventar, Universität Klagenfurt. Lacey, K. (2002). Factors that Impact on Principal-Class Leadership Aspirations. Unpublished PhD Thesis: University of Melbourne. Neidhart, H., & Carlin, P. (2003). To apply or not to apply: Incentives and disincentives to application for principalship. Refereed paper presented at Hawaii International Conference on Social sciences. Sheraton Waikiki, Honolulu, June 12-15. Smith, J. (2011). Aspirations to and Perceptions of Secondary Headship: Contrasting Female Teachers’ and Headteachers’ Perspectives. Educational Management Administration Leadership, 39(5), 516-535. Van Cooley, E., & Shen, J. (2000). Factors Influencing Applying for Urban Principalship. Education and Urban Society, 32, 443-454. Vogtenhuber, S., Lassnig, L., Bruneforth, M., Herzog-Punzenberger, B., Auer, C., Gumpoldsberger, H., & Schmich J. (2012). Inputs - personelle und finanzielle Ressourcen. In M. Bruneforth & L. Lassnigg (Hrsg.), Nationaler Bildungsbericht Österreich 2012. Band 1. Das Schulsystem im Spiegel von Daten und Indikatoren (31-60). Graz: Leykam. Warwas, J. (2012). Berufliches Selbstverständnis, Beanspruchung und Bewältigung in der Schulleitung. Heidelberg: Springer.

Author Information

Stephan Gerhard Huber (presenting / submitting)
University of Teacher Education Central Switzerland (PHZ) Zug, Switzerland
Johannes Kepler University Linz
Department for Educational Science and Educational Psychology
Linz

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.