Collaborative Art-Making for Inclusion and Intercultural Education
Author(s):
Panayiotis Angelides (presenting / submitting) Christina Hadjisoteriou (presenting)
Conference:
ECER 2013
Format:
Paper

Session Information

20 SES 05 JS, Intercultural Practices

Paper Session
Joint Session with NW 07

Time:
2013-09-11
11:00-12:30
Room:
D-303
Chair:
Ghazala Bhatti

Contribution

Objectives: The aim of the proposal is to address the challenge of marginalisation, xenophobia, racism and interculturalism through the use of collaborative art-making. The study also explores in what ways school communities across five European countries may use collaborative art-making to become more inclusive in terms of maximising the participation of all children in their cultures, curricula and learning communities. The project's central activity is the adaptation, development, testing, implementation and dissemination of new teaching methodologies and pedagogical strategies for use in the classroom and the development of materials for use by students. The new pedagogical strategies relate to creative uses of collaborative art-making that refer to topics related to marginalisation, diversity, interculturalism and democratic European citizenship.

Research Questions: What kind of teaching methodologies and educational activities that pertain to collaborative art-making allow students to: (i) engage in individual art-making activities regarding diversity, marginalisation and a democratic European citizenship; (ii) discuss the ‘stories’ of their creations in relation to their depiction of diversity and encounters with ‘others’; (iii) enhance their positive stances towards ‘difference’ and ‘diversity’; (iv) enhance their in-between interaction promoting the increased participation of students who have been identified as marginalised. 

Theoretical Framework: Teachers face difficulties in approaching children especially those who come from disadvantaged groups (Angelides, Stylianou & Gibbs, 2006). Collaborative art-making proved to be efficient in assisting teachers to effectively transfer to students intercultural values like respect to the ‘other’ and acceptance of difference (Angelides & Michaelidou, 2009). Thus collaborative art-making may become an important tool in the hands of teachers in promoting interculturalism and reducing marginalisation.

Research has shown that by reducing marginalisation and increasing participation, certain power relations (economic, gendered, ethnic) can be altered because collaborative art-making can help students see things differently (Cooper & Sjostrom, 2006). Students can come closer to each other, understand each other’s emotions, see their peers from a human perspective and generally, think harder about their classmates regardless of race, ethnicity or social class (Rubin, 1997). Collaborative art-making directs students not to simplify human emotions and behaviour but to see their peers as human beings, and as a result, to begin trusting them.

Through collaborative art-making, children who have a common goal to achieve within their group learn to share thoughts and emotions and use critical thought to go into the others’ emotions. Thus, all children may externalise their stereotypes, exchange thoughts and ideas on diversity and democracy, and empathise with the others. In addition, children who face learning or language difficulties are able to participate, as the art approach is different from the oral approaches. Children, who do not express themselves orally as they do not know the language or for other reasons, can transmit their desires through their drawings. Lastly, through collaboration, marginalised children may develop friendships and build trust with their art group.

Method

During the 1st phase, we mapped the current state of affairs across the five countries (Cyprus, Greece, Germany, Ireland, and Italy) with regards to collaborative art-making for inclusion and intercultural education. During the 2nd phase, we conducted interviews with art-teachers, and local and migrant students. The interviewees were asked to describe their needs; the practices and educational activities they used (for teachers) or participated in (for students) to promote inclusion and intercultural education in their classrooms; and their further suggestions. The data were thematically analysed (separately for each country and then compared and contrasted across countries). In the 3rd phase, the consortium used the analysed data to develop pertinent activities and materials of collaborative art-making for the following pools of activities: Marginalisation Reduction; Encounters with Difference; and Democratic Sense of European Citizenship. The activities were translated and localised in the languages of the consortium. In the 4th phase, the partners organised training sessions in each country for the participant art-teachers. In the 5th phase, the partners piloted, revised and implemented the activities and materials of collaborative art-making in the classrooms of the participants. Post-implementation interviews about the contribution of the activities were conducted and analysed.

Expected Outcomes

The project presented in this paper demonstrates manners in which collaborative art-making and educational activities can be used in school for the promotion of intercultural education. Educators and students approached collaborative art-making in order to analyse and discuss ways to improve their stances towards "difference". The project aspired to combat xenophobia and racism and reinforces all students’ participation in classroom activities. The project provided the participant teachers with educational strategies and material that enabled them to deploy collaborative art-making to promote amongst their students an awareness of the importance of cultural and linguistic diversity within Europe and of the need to combat racism, prejudice and xenophobia. Research skills, critical thinking and positive stances towards the different were enhanced. In addition, the use of the developed activities and materials in the classroom allowed the student’s ‘hidden’ voices to be heard, while it enabled the participant teachers to pay particular attention to students who faced learning and language difficulties. Those students’ voices were more easily heard through collaborative art-making.

References

Angelides, P. & Michaelidou, A. (2009) The deafening silence: Discussing children’s drawings for understanding and addressing marginalisation, Journal of Early Childhood Research, 7(1), 27-45. Angelides, P., Stylianou, T. & Gibbs, P. (2006) Preparing teachers for inclusive education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 22(4), 513-522. Cooper, M. & Sjostrom, L. (2006). Making art together: How collaborative art-making can transform kids, classrooms and communities. Boston, MA: Beacon Press. Hajisoteriou, C. (2012). Intercultural education set forward: Operational strategies and procedures of Cypriot classrooms. Intercultural Education, 23(2), 133-146. Karkou, V. & Glasman, J. (2004). Arts, education and society: The role of the arts in promoting the emotional wellbeing and social inclusion of young people. Support for Learning, 19(2), 57-65. Rubin, J. (1997). Treating children through art. Athens: Ellinika Grammata. [In Greek]

Author Information

Panayiotis Angelides (presenting / submitting)
University of Nicosia, Cyprus
University of Nicosia, Cyprus

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.