Pre-Service science teachers’ teaching self-efficacy in relation to locus of control, attitude towards science teaching, and sex
Author(s):
Burcu Senler (presenting / submitting)
Conference:
ECER 2014
Format:
Paper

Session Information

ERG SES D 06, Education and Pre-Service Teachers

Paper Session

Time:
2014-09-01
13:30-15:00
Room:
FPCEUP - 245
Chair:
Paulo Nogueira

Contribution

Research in the area of teacher effectiveness has revealed that many teacher characteristics appear to be related to it. Teacher’s sense of efficacy is one teacher characteristic that has been significantly related student motivation (Midgley, Feldlaufer & Eccles, 1989), and achievement (Ashton & Webb, 1986; Bandura, 1993; Goddard, Hoy & Woolfolk-Hoy, 2000; Hoy, Sweetland & Smith, 2002). In addition, it is also found to be related to teaching behavior and performance (Riggs et al., 1994). Teachers with a strong sense of efficacy desire to try different materials and approaches (Cousins & Walker, 2000; Weiner, 2003), to improve their teaching (Weiner, 2003), and show greater commitment to teaching (Coladarci, 1992). A strong sense of self-efficacy helps teachers deal with a struggling student longer and become less critical of student errors (Ashton & Webb, 1986; Gibson & Dembo, 1984; Fuchs, Fuchs & Bishop, 1992). On the other hand, teachers with a low sense of self-efficacy are likely to be less willing to work with difficult students and to be less optimistic about student learning. They feel discouraged about teaching and experience lower levels of job-satisfaction (Ashton, 1984; Caprara et al., 2006; Klassen et al., 2009; Tschannen-Moran, Woolfolk-Hoy, & Hoy, 1998). Therefore, in order to raise effective teachers, it is important to develop teaching self-efficacy of pre-service science teachers. In consideration of this, there is a need to investigate the factors influencing the development of teacher self-efficacy beliefs starting with pre-service years. Indeed, the development of self-efficacy beliefs among pre-service teachers has attracted a great deal of research interest, as once efficacy beliefs are established; they tend to be resistant to change (Hoy & Spero, 2005).

The other characteristic in being an effective teacher is locus of control. Locus of control as developed by Rotter (1966) based on the social-cognitive theory, is a well-known cognitive-behavioral psychological attribute refers to one’s belief in his or her abilities to control life events. Locus of control is one construct which determines teachers’ roles in classroom (Lefcourt, 1982; Spector, 1982). Studies suggests that teacher locus of control is related to mo­tivation (Anderson, Hattie & Hamilton, 2005), self-efficacy (Anderson, Hattie & Hamilton, 2005), students’ perception of classroom (Sadowski & Woodward, 1983; Sadowski, Blackwell & Willard, 1986),  teaching performance (Sadowski & Woodward, 1983; Sadowski, Blackwell & Willard, 1986), anxiety, attitude and confidence (Pigge & Marso, 1990; Smith, 1997), and classroom  management styles (Bredekamp & Coppler, 1997).

As another teacher characteristic, teachers’ attitude towards science is one of the major influences on students’ attitude toward science. Thus, it is important to determine teachers’ attitude towards science. Based on this idea, this construct was examined in relation to self-efficacy (Gassert, Shroyen & Staver, 1996; Tekkaya, Cakiroglu & Ozkan 2002), teachers’ preparation and their practice (Manning, Esler, & Baird, 1982), locus of control (Haury , 1984), teachers’ understanding of science concepts (Tekkaya, Cakiroglu & Ozkan 2002), their ability to affect science learning among elementary students and their level of science knowledge (Wenner, 1993).

The aim of the present study is to examine the relationships among pre-service science teachers’ teaching self-efficacy, locus of control, attitude towards science teaching, and sex by proposing and testing a conceptual model. 

Method

Participants A total number of 245 senior pre-service science teachers (102 males and 143 females) participated in the study from four universities in Turkey. All of the universities involved in the study were public universities that follow the same teacher education program, which had been restructured for all disciplines by the Higher Education Council (YOK, 2006). The science teacher education program intends to prepare teachers for the middle schools of the Ministry of National Education. During the four years, pre-service science teachers are required to complete coursework, suggested by The Higher Education Council. This restructured program contains courses in different branches of science, namely biology, physics, and chemistry and several courses related to special subject training and pedagogy. The pedagogical domain includes field experience courses in which pre-service teachers observe teaching environments and teach in actual classes. Instruments The Locus of Control Scale for Teachers (Sadowski et al., 1982) was used to assess pre-service science teachers’ locus of control. This 14-item scale is a self-report instrument based on Rotter’s theoretical foundations on locus of control to identify locus of control in teachers. For each item, the participants were asked to rate themselves on a 5 point Likert-type scale ranging from 5- completely agree to 1-they never agree. The scale was translated and adapted into Turkish by Bulus (2011). The Science Teaching Efficacy Belief Instrument Form B (STEBI-B) (Enochs & Riggs, 1990) was designed to measure self-efficacy beliefs of pre-service elementary teachers regarding science teaching. The STEBI-B consists of 23 items in a five-point Likert type scale and response categories were accomplished by assigning a score through 5-strongly agree to 1- strongly disagree. The STEBI-B was translated and adapted into Turkish by Tekkaya, Cakiroglu and Ozkan (2002). The Science Teaching Attitude Scale (Thompson & Shringley, 1986), an instrument designed to measure pre-service elementary teachers’ attitude towards science teaching consists of 20 items in a five-point Likert scale format. Response categories were accomplished by assigning a score through 5-strongly agree to 1-strongly disagree. The science teaching attitude scale was translated and adapted into Turkish by Tekkaya, Cakiroglu and Ozkan (2002). Data Analysis In the present study, path analysis was conducted by utilizing AMOS 18 to investigate the relationships among pre-service science teachers’ teaching self-efficacy, locus of control, attitude towards science teaching, and sex.

Expected Outcomes

In order to examine the relationships among pre-service science teachers’ teaching self-efficacy, locus of control, attitude towards science teaching, and sex, path analysis was conducted by proposing a conceptual model. In the proposed model, all the variables were identified as observed variables. The resulting fit indices indicated that the model fits the data well (χ2/sd = 1.7, RMSEA = .03, TLI = .98, GFI = .98, CFI = .97). Since the fit indices explained the data well, the standardized path coefficients for direct and indirect effects were analyzed. At this point, it should be noted that in the current study, the notion of effect does not imply causality; it simply denotes the exerted influence of one variable on another. The results demonstrated that locus of control was significantly associated with pre-service science teachers’ attitude towards science teaching, and attitude towards science teaching was also significantly associated with pre-service science teachers’ teaching self-efficacy. Locus of control accounted for 57 % of variance in attitude towards science teaching while attitude towards science teaching accounted for 70 % of variance in teaching self-efficacy. In addition, the indirect effect of locus of control mediated by attitude towards science teaching on teaching self-efficacy appears to be positive and locus of control accounted for 40 % of variance in teaching self-efficacy. On the other hand, sex was found not to be significantly related with any variables in the study. These findings implied that pre-service science teachers, who believe in their abilities to control students’ learning in other words who thinks that outcomes are related to their behavior or personal effort, are likely to have positive attitude towards science teaching. Moreover, pre-service science teachers, who have positive tendency toward teaching science, believe that they have the ability to teach science effectively and can affect student achievement.

References

Anderson, A., Hattie, J. & Hamilton, R.J. (2005). Locus of control, self-efficacy, and motivation in different schools: Is moderation the key to success? Educational Psychology, 25(5), 517. Ashton, P. T., & Webb, R. B. (1986). Making a difference: teachers’ sense of efficacy and student achievement. New York, NY: Longman. Bandura, A. (1993). Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning. Educational Psychologist, 28(2), 117-148. Coladarci, T. (1992). Teachers’ sense of efficacy and commitment to teaching. Journal of Experimental Education, 60(4), 323–337. Cousins, J. B., & Walker, C. A. (2000). Predictors of educators’ valuing of systemic inquiry in schools. Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation (Special Issue), 25–53. Enochs, L. G., & Riggs, I. M. (1990). Further development of an elementary science teaching efficacy belief instrument: A preservice elementary scale. School Science and Mathematics, 90(8), 695-706. Hoy, A. W. & Spero, R. B. (2005) Changes in teacher efficacy during the early years of teaching: A comparison of four measures. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(4), 343-356. Manning, P.C., Esler, W. K., & Baird, J. R. (1982). How much elementary science is really being taught? Science and Children, 19(8), 40-41. Rotter, J. B. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs, 80(1), 1-28. Sadowski, C. J., Blackwell, M. W., & Willard, J. L.(1986). Locus of control and student teacher performance. Education, 105(4), 391-393. Sadowski, C.J. & Woodward, H.R. (1983). Teacher locus of control and classroom climate: A cross-lagged correlational study. Psychology in the Schools. 20(4), 506-509. Sadowski, C.J., Taylor, R. C., Woodward, H. R., Peacher, R. K., & Martin, B. J.(1982). The reliability and validity of a Likert-type locus of control scale for teachers. JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 12, 32. Smith, K. E. (1997). Student teachers’ beliefs about developmentally appropriate practice: pattern, stability, and the influence of locus of control. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 12 (2) , 221-243. Tekkaya, C., Cakiroglu, J., Ozkan, O. (2002). A case study on science teacher trainees. Education and Science, 126, 15-21. Thompson, C. L., Shrigley, R. L. (1986). What research says: Revising the science attitude scale. School Science and Mathematics, 86(4), 331-343. Tschannen-Moran, M., Woolfolk-Hoy, A., & Hoy, W. K. (1998). Teacher efficacy: Its meaning and measure. Review of Educational Research, 68(2), 202-248. Wenner, G. (1995). Science knowledge and efficacy beliefs among preservice elementary teachers: A follow-up study. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 4(4), 307- 315.

Author Information

Burcu Senler (presenting / submitting)
MUGLA SITKI KOCMAN UNIVERSITY
MUGLA

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.