Struggling for Selfhood: Economically Marginalised Mature Students Trying to Gain Access to Higher Education in England
Author(s):
Hugh Busher (presenting / submitting) Nalita James Anna Piela
Conference:
ECER 2014
Format:
Paper

Session Information

22 SES 06 D, Inclusion and Diversity in Higher Education Settings

Paper Session

Time:
2014-09-03
15:30-17:00
Room:
B019 Anfiteatro
Chair:
Colin McCaig

Contribution

The study reported in part in this paper focused on how economically challenged adult learners on Access to Higher Education (HE) courses in England struggled with institutional and social structures in particular socio-economic circumstances (Foucault, 1977) to attend their courses and pursue the project of the self (Giddens, 1991). Despite the power-invested relationships (Handley et al., 2006) with their tutors and their interactions with each other the students appeared to generate collaborative communities of practice (Lave and Wenger, 1991) on their courses, transforming their identities.

 

Participants in the study, Access to HE students and their tutors were asked about students’ past and present learning experiences, the transformation of students’ views of themselves as learners during the Access course, relationships between students and tutors, and the impact on their learning of students’ socio-economic contexts including their relationships with their families, friends and fellow students.

 

Little seems to be known nationally in England and Wales about mature students’ views of their engagement with learning on Access courses and how these influence their transitions to Higher Education and their shifts in identity (Askham, 2008). Yet about 40,000 students join these courses each year, of whom about 50% are successful in gaining access to Higher Education (QAA, 2012). Those studies that have been carried out tend to regard mature or non-standard students as homogenous groups who are socio-economically and culturally disadvantaged (Warmington, 2002) most of whom hold negative memories of earlier compulsory education (Brine and Waller 2004).

 

Access to HE courses, requiring less than one year of full-time study, provide a unique route into HE for mature learners, often from disadvantaged socio-economic backgrounds. These courses were originally established in the 1970s in England and Wales in an attempt to redress the balance of educational disadvantage (Jones, 2006) some people experienced. The courses lead to a diploma that is awarded by regional award validating authorities (AVAs) for vocational education which are regulated by the Quality Assurance Agency (QAA), an agency of central government in England and Wales. They are designed to provide adult learners with generic skills and subject knowledge in a wide range of areas such as nursing and midwifery, social science, arts and humanities and science and technology to prepare students for study at university. They are usually delivered in Further Education (FE) Colleges which generally offer a collaborative ethos or culture focused around values celebrating mature learners (Warmington, 2002).

 

Widening participation is a contested notion linked in part to social justice and equality of opportunity and in part to strengthening economic prosperity both for individuals and nationally (Burke, 2007). Education policy in England increasingly emphasise strengthening the national economy and lessening youth unemployment rather than creating opportunities to broaden student diversity. Similar contradictions face governments across Europe, as countries strive to create mass HE to generate high-skilled labour to compete in a global market (Field et al., 2010).

 

Power flows in and around organisations (Benjamin, 2002). Socio-political contexts affect the development of students’ identities (Giddens, 1991). Important sites for this struggle are the Access courses students attend, although the cultures on the courses are thought to mediate the sense of struggle and educational disadvantage (Jones, 2006). Within courses, students’ negotiations of work schedules with tutors is a political processes (Ball, 1987, Handley et al., 2006), tutors having formal power deriving from their office, from their access to resources of knowledge (Busher, 2006) and from their regulatory or disciplinary power and powers of surveillance (Foucault, 1977) on behalf of their colleges and the AVAs giving Access to HE diplomas. However, students also assert power in these relationships.

Method

The study took a social constructivist perspective (Lave and Wenger, 1991), using a linked case study design (Miles and Huberman, 1994) across seven FE Colleges in the East Midlands of England in 2012-2013. It used mixed methods to triangulate the perspectives of students on Access to HE course within and across colleges to enhance the trustworthiness of the study. Subject to their ethical consent (BERA, 2011), all Access to HE course students in each college were invited to complete two questionnaires about their views of themselves as learners, one at the start of their course and one at the end, to gain a broad view of their perspectives and to complement the in-depth views gained from the student focus groups and concept maps. In each college, seven Access to HE students were invited to participate in focus group interviews on three occasions during the academic year to track their changing views. We tried to gain as wide a spread of students by social status and subject pathway within the Access to HE courses as possible. Access to HE tutors were invited to take part in individual semi-structured or group interviews on two occasions during the year to provide an institutional perspective on the courses. Data was analysed on a college by college basis as well as across colleges. We had 365 questionnaire responses (out of more than 700 possible replies) from the seven colleges/institutions in the Autumn 2012. Overall, 70% of respondents were female but in College 4 no men answered the questionnaire while in College 6 50 % of the answers came from men. The quantitative data was analysed with simple descriptive statistics while the open-ended answers were scrutinized to generate numeric codes that would help to illustrate trends and patterns within the cohort of the study. The qualitative data from the interviews was audio-recorded, transcribed and analysed using a grounded approach (Corbin and Strauss, 2008) powered by NVivo to construct themes that reflected participants’ own constructs of themselves and their contexts. The visual data from the concept maps, through which students could express their views visually of their transitions and transformations was analysed hermeneutically (Prosser, 2006).

Expected Outcomes

Participants in this study noted how socio-political contexts affected the development of their identities, as Giddens (1991) predicted. Important sites for this were the Access courses students attended, although the cultures on the courses gave students a sense of community which mediated their sense of struggle and educational disadvantage (Jones, 2006). Students’ struggles with their socio-economic contexts helped them to develop their identities and recognise what they wanted to achieve in life, showing how negotiations between agency and social settings and policy discourses, some of which were reified as institutional structures, led to students’ personal development: The development of the self was manifestly an on-going project (Brine and Waller, 2004). It was these struggles which gave Access to HE students the motivations to return to formal education, even though it was an arena in which many of them had had little success in the past. The asymmetrical nature of power was visible in many of these struggles where students felt they had limited power but, none the less, negotiated the best deals they could to meet their values and interests. Within Access to HE courses, students’ negotiations of work schedules with tutors was a political process (Ball, 1987, Handley et al., 2006). Students perceived their tutors having formal power deriving from their office and from their access to resources of knowledge which could help students pass the course as well as regulatory or disciplinary power and powers of surveillance (Foucault, 1977) on behalf of their colleges and the AVAs giving Access to HE diplomas. Students also asserted power in these relationships, asking tutors frequently for help with developing aspects of their course, as well as each other for help and other resources to facilitate learning and the logistics of attending Access to HE courses.

References

Askham P (2008) Context and identity: exploring adult learners experiences of higher education, Journal of Further and Higher Education, 32 (1)85-97. Ball, S. J. (1987) The Micro-politics of the school London: Methuen Benjamin, S. (2002) The micro-politics of inclusive education, Buckingham: Open University Press British Educational Research Association (2011) Ethical Guidelines for Educational Research Brine, J. and Waller, R. (2004) Working class women on an access course: risk, opportunity and (re)constructing identities, Gender and Education, 16 (1) 97-113 Burke, P. J. (2007) Men Accessing Education: Masculinities, Identifications and Widening Participation, British Journal of Sociology of Education, 28(4) 411-424. Busher, H (2006) Understanding Educational leadership: People, power and culture, Buckingham: Open University Press Corbin, J., and Strauss, A. (2008) Basics of qualitative research : techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory 3rd ed. Los Angeles, Calif. & London : Sage, Field, J., Merrill, B., and Morgan-Klein, N. ‘Researching Higher Education Access, Retention and Drop-Out through a European Biographical Approach: Exploring similarities and differences within a research team’, European Society for Research on the Education of Adults, Sixth European Research Conference, University of Linköping, 23-26 September 2010. Foucault, M. (1977) Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison, trans. A. Sheridan, London: Allen Lane Giddens, A. (1991) Modernity and self-identity: Self and society in the late modern age, Cambridge: Polity Press. Handley, K., Sturdy, A., Fincham, R. & Clark, T. (2006) Within and Beyond Communities of Practice: Making Sense of Learning through Participation, Identity and Practice, Journal of Management Studies, 43, 641-653 Jones, K. (2006) Valuing diversity and widening participation: The experiences of Access to Social Work students in further and higher education, Social Work Education, 25 (5), 485-500. Lave, J. and Wenger, E. (1991) Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Miles, M. B, and Huberman, M. (1994) Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook, C.A., Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications Inc Prosser, J. (2006) Image-based research: a sourcebook for qualitative researchers. London: RoutledgeFalmer Quality Assurance Agency (2012) Access to Higher Education: Key Statistics Warmington. P. (2002) Studenthood as Surrogate Occupation: Access to HE Students' Discursive Production of Commitment, Maturity and Peer Support, Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 54 (4) 583-600.

Author Information

Hugh Busher (presenting / submitting)
University of Leicester, United Kingdom
University of Leicester, United Kingdom
Leeds Trinity University, Leeds, UK

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.