Methodological And Epistemological Reflections Regarding A Research Project About Youth Participation
Author(s):
Alba Parareda (presenting / submitting)
Conference:
ECER 2014
Format:
Poster

Session Information

ERG SES D 02, Pecha Kucha Poster Session

Poster +Pecha Kucha Session

Time:
2014-09-01
13:30-15:00
Room:
FPCEUP - 114
Chair:
Fiona Hallett

Contribution

My contribution presents my ongoing doctoral thesis, which is part of the R & D project titled Demoskole: Democracy, participation and inclusive education at schools, and it focuses on the analysis of immigrant youth participation inside and outside schools. More specifically, it attempts to answer the following research question: Do experiences of participation of young immigrant contribute to the learning of democratic values?

 

What I want to understand is the participation of young immigrant in order to investigate to what extent, from their point of view, there is a relationship between their participation experiences and the learning of democracy. Although the analysis of the participation is carried out inside and outside the schools, it is mostly at educational institutions where young people spend much of their lifetime during their academic training (Alegre, 2007). Thus, from our perspective, schools must supervise the learning of democratic practice, and facilitate the learning of values such as dialogue, decision-making, consensus, and respect for differences. As stated by Martínez Bonafé (2003), the construction of a participatory and democratic discourse at school should overcome the contradictions of modern society and avoid the temptation of leaving meaningless the term democracy. It is necessary to learn experiencing democracy, living it (Dewey, 1995).

 

Regarding the research question outlined above, I consider that two concepts are central for the development of the thesis. On the one hand, participation, and on the other hand, democratic learning.

 

As Checkoway and Gutiérrez (2009) argued, substantial participation is the one that is able to involve young people in decisions that affect their environment, their life. Other authors such as Geilfus (2009), and Piédrola and Coscolla (2007) or Sellarès (2003) outline similar definitions that share three elements: to be involved in some decision or responsibility; to be part of something, of a collective; and make decisions that are in relation to our environment, to those things we feel connected. In addition, from Demoskole we connect this substantial participation to democratic values.

 

In regard to the learning of a democratic engagement, it is closely related to the concept of citizenship. García and Lukes (1999) argue that the notion of citizenship is linked to the combination of three elements: having certain rights and the responsibility to fulfil certain obligations; membership in a community in reference to the nationality that share their members; and the chance to contribute to public life community through participation. Of these three elements, as highlighted Bolívar (2007), the most interesting for this thesis is the third related to the possibility of citizens to participate in public life. Cortina (1997) and Bolívar (2007) add that it is an “active exercise more than a static condition” (Bolívar, 2007: 17). Bolívar points out that “educating for citizenship means strengthening the training of self-sufficient people, and also with those civic virtues necessary to assume and embrace the community life. An education based on the exercise of citizenship promotes inside and outside the school activity dialogic processes of shared deliberation, decision-making and independent training of judgement” (2007: 96).

 

In sum, I am interested in understanding the involvement of young immigrant in relationship with the learning of democratic values, bearing in mind the considerations noted for both concepts.

Method

I will address the investigation through narrative research, which is part of the interpretative perspective; that is, the result of the hermeneutic turn in the social sciences (change from positivism to interpretative thought, Bolívar, 2002). Within the narrative framework, there are various types. On the one hand, autobiographies can be carried out either by the principle actors of the story or are the result of the interaction between the protagonists and a researcher that focuses on a specific issue (Biglia and Bonet-Martí, 2009). On the other side, the construction of narratives, which consists of a “process of investigation that wants to be carried out from –and also be the product of– the linkage between different subjectivities” (Biglia and Bonet-Martí, 2009: 7). In this case, it means that we must assume that the intervention and interpretation of the researcher is not neutral, but it is part of the narrative created. Not only but also that the meeting between subjectivities involves the creation of a collective production (Biglia and Bonet-Martí, 2009). Thus, I base my study on the narrative construction, as I am interested in the young people’s voice in their experiences of participation, but I understand that my intervention cannot be separated from the interpretation I do of these experiences, so it converges in the idea of a collective text construction. In turn, the construction of the narrative can be done from a single text or allowing different voices to surface, even if it means contradictions in the text itself (Biglia and Bonet-Martí, 2009). From my point of view, this element will allow me to show the different singularities of the players interviewed. The justification of the method is not only methodological but also epistemological and ideological: methodological, because we access meaningful information of the individuals’ lives through which we can understand the scenes they move; epistemological, because the produced knowledge is significant and is constructed through the participants’ interaction in the investigation; and ideological, as it represents a way of understanding the democratic values, the collective construction and the respect to subjectivities (Rivas, 2007). This approach makes me analyse what data-collection tools may be the most suitable to interact deeply with the experiences of the protagonists. In the preliminary stages of my study, I will collect conversations with 4-6 youth using objects and places that could be significant for them in relation to participation along with personal notes.

Expected Outcomes

I am currently in the process of reading, focusing on the methodology of the study. I have in mind using narrative research, but I do not know exactly how this will take shape when carrying out fieldwork. So now it is time to think how these conversations and in-depth interviews will be, and also how I will establish a relationship of trust with the interviewees. To study in depth and understand the readings about narrative construction is one of the horizons I have more present, as the similarities between techniques that belong to the same method are important enough, which requires finding out the exact differences. Thus, in each new text, new possibilities and new ideas appear, yet, I see the need to specify the theory in practice, that is, to understand the methodology and how to apply it to my case. At the same time, other questions that arise are related to the challenge of building a shared discourse with the young people, the ability to bring the research to them as they understand it, make sense to them and want to share their experiences. Furthermore, how I will face the process of writing my thesis without betraying the voices of youth, being aware, as stated Spivak (1988), that in this interrelation between researcher and participant there is a relation of power. And not only that, how I will produce this report in one piece, because as Bolívar (2002: 19) said, “a good narrative research is not only that one that gathers the distinct voices on the field, or it explains them, but the one that produces a good narrative story, that is, in the end, the investigation report”.

References

Alegre, M. À. (2007). Geografies adolescents a secundària: posicionaments culturals i relacionals dels i les joves d’orígen immigrant. Barcelona: Generalitat de Catalunya, Secretaria de Joventut. Ballester i Frago, M. (2013). La promoció de la participació juvenil des de l’acció comunitària. Aportacions d'un estudi de cas. Barcelona: Generalitat de Catalunya, Departament de Benestar Social i Família, Direcció General de Joventut. Biglia, B., & Bonet-Martí, J. (2009). La construcción de narrativas como método de investigación psico-social. Prácticas de escritura compartida. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 10(1), 1–25. Bolívar Botía, A. (2002). “¿De nobis ipsis silemus?”: Epistemología de la investigación biográfico-narrativa en educación. Revista Electrónica de Investigación Educativa Investigación Biográfico-Narrativa En Educación, 4(1), 1–26. Bolívar Botía, A. (2007). Educación para la ciudadanía: algo más que una asignatura. Barcelona: Graó. Checkoway, B.; Gutiérrez, L. (eds). (2009). Teoría y práctica de la participación juvenil y el cambio comunitario. Barcelona: Graó. Cortina, A. Ciudadanos del mundo: hacia una teoría de la ciudadanía (1997). Madrid: Alianza. Dewey, J. (1995). Democracia y educación : una introducción a la filosofía de la educación. Madrid: Morata. Dueñas Salmán, L. R., & García López, E. J. (2011). El papel de la educación escolar en la construcción de cultura de participación y de ciudadanía democrática. Razón Y Palabra, (77). García, S.; Lukes, S. (comps.) (1999). Ciudadanía : justícia social, identidad y participación. Madrid: Siglo Veintiuno de España. Geilfus, F. (2009). 80 herramientas para el desarrollo participativo: diagnóstico, planificación, monitoreo y evaluación (8th ed.). San José: Instituto Interamericano de Cooperación para la Agricultura (IICA). Martínez Bonafé, J. (2003). Ciutadania, poder i educació. Biblioteca de guix (Vol. 133, p. 154). Barcelona: Graó. Piédrola, À.; Coscolla, R. (2007). Recerca-acció sobre participació juvenil als centres de secundària de Catalunya. Barcelona: Fundació Pere Tarrés. Rivas Flores, J. I. (2007). Vida, Experiencia y Educación: La Biografía como Estrategia de Conocimiento. In I. Sverdlick (Ed.), La Investigación Educativa. Una Herramienta de Conocimiento y de Acción. Buenos Aires: Novedades Educativas. Sellarès, A. (2003). La participació jove. Barcelona: Generalitat de Catalunya. Col·lecció Sinèrgia, num. 6. Spivak, G. C. (1988). Can the subaltern speak? In L. Nelson, Cary; Grossberg (Ed.), Marxism and the interpretation of culture (pp. 271–313). Illinois: University of Illinois.

Author Information

Alba Parareda (presenting / submitting)
Universitat de Vic, Spain

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.