Conditional equality in privatised schooling: Is there a public good in the private sector?
Author(s):
Ruth Boyask (presenting / submitting)
Conference:
ECER 2014
Format:
Paper

Session Information

23 SES 07 B, Globalization, Privatizations and Neo-Liberal Reforms in Education (Part 2)

Paper Session: continued from 23 SES 07 B

Time:
2014-09-03
17:15-18:45
Room:
B332 Sala de Aulas
Chair:
Peter Kelly

Contribution

The expansion of private sector involvement in state-funded schooling is a global phenomenon, typified in educational policy by publicly funded charter schools in the United States, government establishment grants to non-state schools in Australia, privately governed state-funded free schools in Sweden, and the development and expansion of academy schooling in the state sector in England. In this paper I argue that relationships between public and private interests require consideration beyond recognition that such relationships represent an erosion of the public good. The reported research investigates the nature and quality of compromises made by privatised schools in pursuit of social justice. This work is significant in an increasingly privatised schooling sector where schools that have a commitment to equality must negotiate some form of compromise between their values and the prevailing competitive norms of the market. In England there are now more state-funded private ‘academy’ schools in the secondary school sector than traditional state-funded, local authority maintained schools. While there is considerable research undertaken on the new academies, existing privately-funded mostly fee-paying schools also provide a context of interest to those investigating the effects of privatisation upon the public interest. Within this sector there are well established schools where private interests are fully embedded in all operations of schooling. The research focuses upon private fee-paying schools that are committed in some sense to equality, and thus represent a compromise made between the individual and common good, drawing parallels between these established schools and the new state-funded private sector.

Method

This paper reports on initial findings from a two year study funded by British Academy/Leverhulme that finishes on 30 Sept 2014. The paper is an outcome of the first phase of data collection, which was a systematic survey of the websites and prospectuses of all privately-funded schools in England. Data from these schools was analysed deductively, comparing statements made by the school about their ethos with the Deweyan 'Democratic Ideal'. This resulted in a selection of schools for further study. The data collection and initial review of this data was completed by the end of April 2013. Since then the analysis is being deepened by interpreting the data inductively, and related to theory on privatisation and social justice.

Expected Outcomes

The findings presented in this paper come from a study on the nature and quality of social justice within privatised schooling funded by the British Academy/Leverhulme Trust. It reports on a survey of fee-paying schools in England which identified schools that express a commitment to equality (in the sense of either equal relationships within the school and/or relationships of mutuality with groups outside of the school) in one or more of the dimensions of school governance, curriculum, pedagogy, intake or outcomes. Unsurprisingly these schools are very rare, comprising less than 4% of the private fee-paying schools in England. The paper presents initial findings that show how these schools realise their commitment to equality. It presents data on the nature of the internal and external relationships of the schools, and uses this data to evaluate the kinds of equality promoted through liberalisation from the state.

References

Ball, S. with Junemann, C (2011) Network governance and Coalition education policy, In Hatcher, R. & Jones, K. (eds) No Country for the Young: education from New Labour to the Coalition. London: Tufnell Press. Dewey, J. (1916/1994) Democracy and Education, The Macmillan Company, Retrieved 20 August 2012, http://www.ilt.columbia.edu/publications/dewey.html Hatcher, R. (2010) Marketisation, privatisation, autonomy and democracy. The Journal for Drama in Education. 26 (2). 50-61. Robertson, S. Mundy, K., Verger, A & Menashy, F. (Eds) (2012) Public Private Partnerships In Education: New Actors and Modes of Governance in a Globalizing World, Edward Elgar Publishing. Robertson, S. & Dale, R. (2013) The Social Justice Implications of Privatisation in Education Governance Frameworks: A Relational Account, Oxford Review of Education.

Author Information

Ruth Boyask (presenting / submitting)
Plymouth University
Plymouth Institute of Education
Plymouth

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.