Digital responsibility of the digital natives in Norway
Conference:
ECER 2014
Format:
Paper (Copy for Joint Session)

Session Information

16 SES 05 B JS, Questioning the Net Generation

Paper Session, Joint Session NW 06 and NW 16

Time:
2014-09-03
11:00-12:30
Room:
B109 Sala de Aulas
Chair:
Stefan Iske

Contribution

The Norwegian curriculum reform of 2006 includes digital skills as one of five basic skills (the ability to read, the ability to write, numeracy, oral skills and digital skills) that should be integrated into every subject area.  One of the basic components of digital skills is digital responsibility and the ability to critically evaluate online resources, digital media and being aware of privacy rights and the consequences of ones choices online.  At the same time there are assumptions that teenagers today are digitally native and therefore aware of most of the challenges connected to the use of digital technology. 

 

The concept of the ‘digital native’ is often applied to the generation born in the digital age, and relates to debates on what it means being digitally competent (Prensky, 2001; Tapscott, 1998). Digital natives are considered to be digitally literate and capable of using digital tools extensively as a result of their familiarity with digital technology and social networking from an early age. According to such approaches, today’s students should be categorised as digital natives. It has however been questioned whether digital natives are in fact as digitally competent as they are assumed to be. We claim that it can be argued that the use of digital technology in schools has led to overgeneralisations about the digital competence of students. Such generalisations have resulted in the myth that young people are more competent than they actually are.

 

With increased use of the Internet and digital technology in teaching and learning as well as the use of social networking activities there is therefore a continuous need for raising the awareness around digital responsibility.  Young people today use digital technology both at home for leisure activities as well as at school.  Consequently they are active online citizens. In order to measure young people’s knowledge and critical reflection on aspects around issues such as safe Internet use, privacy, social networking and cyber bullying we conducted a study including questions on these aspects.

 

Our main objective in this paper is to present a study on digital competence with special focus on factors measuring digital responsibility by 9 graders in Norway.  This is an annual study conducted by the research unit at the Norwegian Centre for ICT in Education on a wide range of aspects connected to access, use and attitudes towards the use of digital technology at school.  In this paper we focus in particular on the aspects connected to digital responsibility and social networking.  The specific research questions are: 1) What kind of social networking activities are the students participating in; 2) What is the student’s knowledge about rules for privacy and re-use of other student’s pictures? And 3) What is the relationship between student’s frequency of use and their competence? We consider the digital responsibility of the students in comparison to the aims of the Norwegian National Curriculum (2006), which requires students leaving lower secondary school to be familiar with aspects connected to e-safety, such as privacy rights, copyrights, information evaluation and source credibility.

Method

A two-step sample design was chosen. First, we randomly selected schools, and then a class of students were selected from each school. This resulted in a sample of 150 Norwegian lower secondary schools that was asked to participate in the study. Out of these 150 schools 38 schools agreed to participate in the study. A total of 852 students answered an online questionnaire containing self-report questions about their use of ICT as well as a test measuring digital competence. The response rate was lower than expected, but analysis of participating schools and students shows no systematic bias when it comes to the schools average computer ratio and students' average academic achievement compared with national data. The questions and the items are developed from previous research, and all questions were tested and piloted prior to study. The data was analysed by using Stata 12. Correlations and multilevel analysis were conducted.

Expected Outcomes

We have found that the digital competence of students is aimed at consumption rather than production, meaning that despite students’ extensive leisure use of social networking and the Internet, their use of digital resources and digital technologies in a learning context is not particularly advanced. At the same time there is a way to go before they manage to use digital technology in a safe way. An analysis of literature on digital natives by Bennett, Marton and Kervin concludes that the literature ‘demonstrates a clear mismatch between the confidence with which claims are made and the evidence for such claims’ (p. 782). Similarly, Selwyn (2008) argues that ‘aside from inequalities in access and engagement, there is mounting evidence that many young people’s actual use of digital technologies remain rather more limited in scope than the digital native rhetoric would suggest’ (p. 372). Our findings show that almost 96% of the students have a FB profile, but the majority of the students takes a passive role, for example by reading others posts, viewing other people’s pictures and respond with ‘Likes’. Further the results indicate that many students have competence about rules for privacy and use of others students’ pictures. However, the minority of students were able to answer correctly about the terms of ownership of images connected to their profile. Overall, it seems that there are variations between students and their use of social networking applications as well as their expertise using it. Preliminary findings indicate that there does not seem to be a clear relationship between their scope of use and expertise.

References

Bennett, S., Maton, K., & Kervin, L. (2008). The ‘digital natives’ debate: A critical review of the evidence. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(5), 775-786. Norwegian Directorate for Education and Training (2006) National Curriculum for Knowledge Promotion in Primary and Secondary Education and Training. Retrieved from http://www.udir.no/Stottemeny/English/Curriculum-in-English/ Norwegian Directorate for Education and Training. (2012). Framework for Basic Skills. Retrieved from http://www.udir.no/Stottemeny/English/Curriculum-in-English/_english/Framework-for-Basic-Skills/ Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants part 1. On the Horizon. Retrieved from http://www.nnstoy.org/download/technology/Digital Natives - Digital Immigrants.pdf Selwyn, N. (2008). The digital native - myth and reality. Aslib Proceedings, 61(4), 364-379. Tapscott, D. (1998). Growing up digital: The rise of the net generation. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Author Information

Greta Björk Gudmundsdottir (presenting / submitting)
The Norwegian Centre for ICT in Education, Norway
The Norwegian Centre for ICT in Education, Norway
The Norwegian Centre for ICT in Education, Norway

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.