23 SES 10 A, Knowledge, Teaching and the Curriculum; New Agendas for Research
The paper identifies three central arguments against testing in the broader research literature. The first is a political argument, which argues that testing is a negative instrument of surveillance, and implies a diminishing trust in teacher professionalism. The second argument is a pedagogical one; it contends that testing negatively affects both the breadth and depth of pedagogy. The third argument is more conceptual ; it draws attention to the knowledge consequences of testing and how assessment can fragment knowledge into isolated facts. What has been neglected is a consideration of testing as a means for signalling appropriate knowledge, in terms of its coherence, sequence, progression and pace. The paper investigates the ways in which test results hold the potential to signal curriculum knowledge and therefore can drive pedagogical possibility rather than closure.
Search the ECER Programme
- Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
- Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
- Search for authors and in the respective field.
- For planning your conference attendance you may want to use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference
- If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.