Embedding writing in the subject curriculum: An intervention study

Author(s):

Ursula Wingate

Conference:

ECER 2009

Network:

22. Research in Higher Education

Format:

Paper

Session Information

22 SES 06 D, Academic Writing

Paper Session

Time:

2009-09-29

10:30-12:00

Room:

HG, HS 45

Chair:

Contribution

This paper addresses the widely recognised need to support students in the UK’s higher education system in the acquisition of academic literacy (Lea & Street, 1998; Lillis 2006). It presents a writing intervention that was carried out with first-year undergraduates in a Social Sciences programme. The intervention recognised the need, stressed by Academic Literacies and EAP researchers (Lea & Street, 2006; Wingate, 2006), to develop writing within the discipline. The research objectives were 1) to assess the feasibility of embedding writing instruction into a content-intensive curriculum, and 2) to assess the impact of the formative feedback provided to students throughout the first term.

Method

Various in-class and online writing tasks, as well as formative assessment measures, were integrated into two first-year modules. The 68 students received tutor and peer feedback on these tasks before they had to write their first assignment. The intervention was evaluated by a student questionnaire, interviews, and a text analysis in which the final assignment was scrutinised for effects of previous feedback.

Expected Outcomes

The intervention was perceived as helpful by the students, and resulted in certain overall improvements in the final assignment. However, a comparison with the assignment grades of previous years showed that the intervention has resulted in a greater gap between high and bottom achievers, with far fewer average performers. This indicates that the intervention had clearly benefited receptive students while others seemed to be ‘feedback-resistant’. Student interviews confirmed previous research findings (e.g. Haggis & Pouget, 2002) by revealing that the gap is partly due to factors that lie outside higher education such as expectations or lack of preparation at school. The paper concludes that for some students additional measures such as individual counselling may be needed.

References

Bazerman, C and Prior, P. (2004). What Writing Does and how it Does It: An Introduction to Analyzing Texts and Textual Practices. Lawrence Erlbaum: Mahwah New Jersey. Berkenkotter, C & Huckin, T. (1995). Genre Knowledge in Disciplinary Communication. NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Drury, H. (2004). Teaching academic writing on screen: a search for best practice. In: Ravelli, L. & R. Ellis (Eds.). Analysing Academic Writing. London, New York: Continuum, 233 – 253. Duke, C. (2002). Managing the Learning University. Buckingham: Open University Press/SRHE. Etherington, S. (2008). Academic writing and the disciplines. In: P. Friedrich (Ed.). Teaching Academic Writing (pp. 26 - 58). London: Continuum. Ganobczik-Williams, L. (2006). Teaching Academic Writing in UK Higher Education. New York, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Haggis, T. & Pouget, M. (2002) Trying to be motivated: perspectives on learning from younger students accessing higher education, Teaching in Higher Education, 7,3, pp. 323 – 336. Hounsell, D. (1988). Towards an anatomy of academic discourse: meaning and context in the undergraduate essay, in: R. Saljo (Ed.). The Written World: Studies in Literate Thought and Action Berlin (pp. 161-177). Springer-Verlag. Hounsell, D. (2003). Student feedback, learning and development. In: Slowey, M. & D. Watson (Eds.). Higher Education and the Lifecourse. Maidenhead: Open University Press, 67 – 78. Hyland, K. (2000). Disciplinary Discourses: Social Interactions in Academic Writing. London: Longman. Ivanic, R. (1998). Writing and Identity: The Discoursal Construction of Identity in Academic Writing. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Ivanic, R. (2004). Discourses of writing and learning to write. Language and Education, 18,3, 220-245. Ivanic, R. & Lea, M. R. (2006). New contexts, new challenges: the teaching of writing in UK higher education, in: L. Ganobcsik-Williams (Ed.). Teaching Academic Writing in UK Higher Education: Theories, Practice and Models (pp. 6 – 15). London: Palgrave MacMillan. Lea, M. R. & Street, B. V. (1998). Student writing in higher education: an academic literacies approach. Studies in Higher Education, 23(2), 157-172. Lea. M. R., & Street, B. V. (2006). The ‘academic literacies’ model: theory and applications. Theory into Practice, 45, 4, 368-377. Lillis, T. (1997). New voices in academia? The regulative nature of academic writing conventions. Language and Education, 11, 3, 182-199. Lillis, T. M. (2001). Student writing: Access, Regulation, Desire. London: Routledge. Lillis, T. (2006). Moving towards an ‘Academic Literacies’ pedagogy: dialogues of participation. In: L. Ganobcsik-Williams (Ed.). Teaching Academic Writing in UK Higher Education: Theories, Practice and Models (pp. 30 – 45). London: Palgrave MacMillan. Lillis, T. & Scott, M. (2007). Defining academic literacies research: issues of epistemology, ideology and strategy. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 4,1, 5 – 32. Mitchell, S. & Evison, A. (2006). Exploiting the potential of writing for educational change at Queen Mary, University of London. In: L. Ganobcsik-Williams (Ed.). Teaching Academic Writing in UK Higher Education: Theories, Practice and Models (pp. 68 – 84). London: Palgrave MacMillan. Monroe, J. ed. (2002). Writing and Revising the Disciplines. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. Monroe, J. (2003). Writing and the disciplines. Peer Review, 6,1, 4 – 7. Monroe, J. ed. (2006). Local Knowledges, Local Practices: Writing in the Disciplines at Cornell. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press. Morley, J. (2008). Writing support in British higher education: An institutional case study. In: P. Friedrich (Ed.). Teaching Academic Writing (pp. 125 – 146). London: Continuum. North, S. (2005). Different values, different skills? A comparison of essay writing by students from arts and science backgrounds. Studies in Higher Education, 30, 5, 517 – 533. Russell, D. (1991). Writing in the Academic Disciplines, 1870-1990: A Curricular History. Carbondale: South Illinois University Press. Russell, D., Lea, M. & Street, B. (2008). Exploring notions of genre in 'academic literacies' and 'writing in the disciplines': approaches across countries and contexts’. Panel at SIGET IV International Symposium on Genre Studies, Brazil, August 2007. http://www.docs.google.com/Doc?docid=dgnh9jtk_6fc3w5c&hl=en [last accessed 17 Nov 2008] Street, B.(1996). Academic Literacies. In: Baker, D., Clay, J. & C. Fox (Eds.) Alternative Ways of Knowing: Literacies, Numeracies, Sciencies (pp. 101 – 124). London: Falmer Press. Street, B.(2000). Literacy events and literacy practices. In: M. Martin-Jones & K. Jones (Eds.) Multilingual Literacies: Comparative Perspectives on Research and Practice (pp. 17 – 29). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Wingate, U. (2006). Doing away with study skills. Teaching in Higher Education, 11 (4), 457 – 465. Wingate, U. (2007) A framework for transition: supporting ‘learning to learn’ in higher education. Higher Education Quarterly, 61, 3, 391 - 405. Wingate, U. (2008) Enhancing students’ transition to university through online pre-induction courses. In: Donnelly, R. & F. McSweeney (Eds.). Applied eLearning and eTeaching in Higher Education (pp. 178 – 200). Hershey, PA; London: Information Science Reference, IGI Global.

Author Information

Ursula Wingate

King's College London

Education and Professional Studies

London

Search the ECER Programme

Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
Search for authors and in the respective field.
For planning your conference attendance you may want to use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference
If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.