Evaluation of Professional Skills of Physical Education Teachers by Deaf Students
Author(s):
Mahmut Acak (presenting / submitting)
Conference:
ECER 2015
Format:
Paper

Session Information

18 SES 07, Students with Special Needs in Sport and Physical Education Settings

Paper Session

Time:
2015-09-09
17:15-18:45
Room:
326.Oktatóterem [C]
Chair:
Jane Meckbach

Contribution

Basically, when the term “deaf” is used (Friend 2006), people who are deaf and hard of hearing are referred (Hindley, 1997). “The loss of hearing”, however, is the inability to perceive the speech and the acoustic information of the environmental sounds. This inability affects the developmental stages in proportions, regarding its severity, type and the time it happened (Quinsland, 1993). Generally, the deaf are defined as socially underdeveloped because of their lack of communication skills. Because of their inabilities of social communication, their interaction with their families, teachers and trainers are also limited (Antia, 1985; Antia, Kreimeyer, Eldredge 1993).

Participating in sports activities is very important among the deaf community. This benefits the participants not just physically but also personally (Stewart, 1991). For many deaf adults, participating in a sports activity is an important way to socialize (Stewart & Ellis, 2005). The majority of the trainers working with the deaf athletes participating in national or international sports activities, and the referees in these contests are normal people. The trainer should be a social knowledgably expert in his/her field, and an example of a person who directs, trains, prepares, and leads the athletes according to their talents by combining his/her theoretical information and experience (Silva & Steven 2002), with the strategy and motivation properties (Simpson, 1984). Deaf students’ perceptions and attitudes about these concepts have always been an issue of concern.

Every action and decision taken by a trainer is based on the good of the athlete, which increase the chance of a winning by the athlete or the team (Martens, 1998). This motivation of winning sometimes causes trainers to move beyond codes of conduct and exaggerate the feeling of winning. We must especially know that after the match is lost, the manner of the trainer is closely watched by the deaf players.

Athletes expect their trainers to do their best in organizing entertainments, field trips, free time activities, and provide the equipment for the sporting events, choosing room-mates in organizations like preparation camps or tournaments (Konter, 1995). These are very important issues especially in sports organizations involving deaf athletes.

The organization this study was conducted was an annual organization. All deaf schools in Turkey participate in it gathering in a city and compete with each other. Almost everybody working in sports organizations for the deaf are deaf as well. However, the trainers and physical education teachers training the teams participating in hearing impaired organizations consist of normally hearing people.

In this conservative community, it is known that the majority of the trainers are criticized and evaluated by the athletes. And herein, this study is done in order to know and analyze how this silent majority evaluates their trainers.

Method

This study was conducted on 142 male students who were a part of the Turkish Championship for the Deaf held in 2013-2014 school year, and who voluntarily participated in the study. It was limited with the team sports branches including football, volleyball and basketball. In this study, "Trainer Evaluation Scale For Deaf Athletes" developed by Açak and Karademir (2011) was used (Açak & Karademir, 2011). The scale consists of two parts. The first part comprises of the athlete's branches, how many trainers he/she has, age, years of active sporting, educational status, if his/her trainer is also hearing impaired, and the method that the trainer communicates with him/her. The second part consists of a total 12 questions and 3 sub-dimensions. The first dimension consists of 4 questions that measure the technical aspects of the trainer. The second consists of 4 questions that measure the trainer's attitude before the match, during and after the match. The third dimension consists of 4 questions that evaluate the social aspects of the trainer. Scale questions include very short and clear expressions. During the surveying, translators who know the national sign language were present to make sure questions were understood and answered properly. All the student athletes participated in the survey were volunteers and necessary permissions from the trainers and the managers were obtained. Analysis of data In the study, the data that was obtained from 142 athletes participating in team sports, via surveys, were transformed into statistical analysis below by using SPSS (17.0) program: 1. In order to show the distribution of the sample regarding to the demographic variables, frequency and percent calculations were done. 2. In order to evaluate the differentiation level of points taken from the scale, depending on independent variables; dual comparisons were done with interdependent samples t-tests and multi comparisons were done with one way analysis of variance (ANOVA). In the event of a difference, to find the source, LSD and Scheffe tests were applied. Statistical significance level was taken as (α), and the level of significance was taken as p<0.05.

Expected Outcomes

While 69.01% of the athletes did communicate with their trainers using sign language, 21.08% read lips, and 9.91% used translators. Because 66.2% of the participants couldn't read and understand the scale, the questions were asked using sign language. It is rather thought provoking that even though the athletes were students having academic training, 66.2% of them couldn't read the scale. This shows us that there are some deficiencies regarding how we evaluate or even know hearing impaired people. It's been understood that all trainers were trained by normal trainers, and 76.06% of these can communicate with athletes using sign language. It's been found out that hearing impaired students who know sign language have a more positive assessment of their trainers. In the analysis based on the educational status of the study group, as the education level has risen in matches and in social terms, trainer satisfaction was also higher. However, in the analysis done based on the disability type and age variable, inter group differences in all three sub-dimensions have been understood to be statistically insignificant. In the analysis of the study group based on the sports branch, it has been statistically significant. In each 3 sub-dimensions, it's been seen that the evaluation for the football athletes of their trainers are more on the positive side, and for basketball athletes, it is rather on the negative side. We can possibly say that this dissatisfaction of basketball athletes regarding their trainers is because of a lack of communication, as the majority of basketball coaches have no knowledge of sign language.

References

1. Açak, M. & Karademir, T. (2011). Trainer Evaluation Scale For Deaf Athletes. World Applied Sciences Journal, 14 (5): pp. 716-720. 2. Antia, S. (1985). Social integration of hearing impaired children: Fact or fiction. The Volta Review, 18(3), 279-289. 3. Antia, S., Kreimeyer K.H., & Eldredge, N. (1993). Promoting social ınteraction between young children with hearing impairments and their peers. Exceptional Children, 60(30), 262-275. 4. Friend, M. (2006). Special education. Contemporary perspectives for school professionals. Baston. Allyn and Bacon. 5. Hindley, P. (1997). Psychiatric aspects of hearing impairments. , J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 38(1):101–17. 6. Martens, R. (1998). Successful Coaching, Translation: (Tuncer, B.) W Publications, Istanbul. page. 6. 7. Konter, E. (1995). Motivation in Sports, Medical Publishing House, İzmir. page. 167-169. 8. Quinsland, L.K. (1993). Cognitive Progressing and Development of Concepts by Deaf Students, Ameican Annals of the Deaf, 135, 280-284. 9. Silva, J. & Stevens, D.E. (2002). Psychological Foundations of Sport, Pearson Education Company, p.152-161. 10. Simpson, W.K. (1984). A Theoretical Model For Predicting Potential Coaching Success In Women`s Intercollegiate Basketball Based On the Centrality Theory, Coaching Theories, Academic Preparation And Related Variables. Dissertation. Texas: Texas A&M University. 11. Stewart, D.A. (1991). Deaf sport: Theimpact of sports in the deaf community. DC: Gallaudet University Press. Washington. 12. Stewart, D.A., Kathleen, M.E. (2005). Sports and The Deaf Child, American Annals of the Deaf, 150(1), 59-66.

Author Information

Mahmut Acak (presenting / submitting)
İnönü University
Physical Education
Malatya

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.