Exploring the Implementation of Policies to Confront Early School Leaving within the EU Tentative Construction of a Common Grammar
Author(s):
Conference:
ECER 2015
Format:
Paper

Session Information

28 SES 04, Tackling and Understanding Early School Leaving in Europe

Paper Session

Time:
2015-09-09
09:00-10:30
Room:
106.Oktatóterem [C]
Chair:
Eric Mangez

Contribution

This paper analyses the implementation of policies concerning early school leaving (ESL) in Portugal, one of 9 partner countries of the project “Reducing Early School Leaving in Europe”. In line with the ongoing “fabrication of the European space” of education led by a set of discourses, technologies and education policies (Dale, 2009; Delanty, 2014; Landri & Neumann, 2014; Lawn & Grek, 2012) and policy technologies (Magalhães et al, 2013), the paper addresses the questions:  ‘What can the sociologies of education learn about the construction of ESL as a political concept and the policies to confront it?’. The work stems from the analysis of European and national key documents, from partner countries that occupy different power positions within the EU (Belgium, England, Sweden, Portugal, Netherlands, Poland, Spain, Hungary and Austria), where “complex dispositifs and collective experimentations of ‘life together’” concerning ESL have been discussed in the aftermath of the Lisbon Strategy (2000) and to Europe 2020 Strategy. The Portuguese case is analysed at this light, reflecting as well on other countries complex ‘dispositifs’ when convenient (see Araújo, Magalhães, Rocha & Macedo 2014).

European institutions have sought to recreate a new Europe. They anticipate a common mission and incorporate in the European structure old national artefacts and symbols in a new form, in order to create a new European project and place for the emergence of citizens of transnational governance. However, these discourses can become instrumental to Europe, going round rather than confronting any processes of cultural reconfiguration (Alexiadou, 2005; Nóvoa, 2002; Featherstone and Radaelli, 2003). The introduction of new forms of governance/regulation in education is organised through the interactions between supranational, national and local institutions. The production by international organisations of guidelines and programs, reflecting public engagement on education and driving a “globally structured agenda for education” (Dale 2007, 2009) is articulated through a discursive production often assuming the form of recommendations and guidelines requesting the compliance of national agents. Within the framework of programs of cooperation, support, research and development, international organisations – EU, World Bank, OECD, UNESCO, Council of Europe - bring together technical experts and officials of different countries to influence national policy-making (Barroso 2006). By standardising values and norms and arranging funding and evaluation systems, this form of ‘soft’ regulation can be found in EU efforts to coordinate education policies, including those involving ESL, as a social and individual problem identified by the EU.

Europeanisation takes place on the basis of countries’ diverse interpretation and implementation of a common grammar (Magalhães et al, 2013), by means of the national policy and under the framework of programs by different international organisations as already underlined. The role of the state in the definition, steering and implementation of policies and public action comes hand in hand with the intervention of these and other entities, (Barroso, 2006; Hooghe & Marks 2001). National governments have used the opportunities and constraints arising from the multi-level and multi-layered processes to carry out policies aimed at European integration and at pursuing national goals, the “re-nationalisation policies” (Musselin & Paradise, 2009).

The paper addresses the discourses and technologies in the changing landscape of education to interrogate what are the effects of the envisaged changes in terms of equity and the pedagogical rights envisaged by Basil Bernstein (1996).

Method

As part of the project “Reducing Early School Leaving in Europe” (2013-2018, funded by the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme), the paper identifies and analyses the main EU documents and national initiatives informing and driving ESL policies. They are discussed with a focus on the ‘drivers’ and ‘rationales’ influencing changes in education and training systems. Policies and measures designed to respond directly to EU recommendations and concerns as well as policies and measures designed to address national priorities are examined concerning the Portuguese case, developing a perspective that, according to Roger Dale (2007), should look at the national and European levels as rescaling processes. Tensions, reconfigurations and resistance processes to EU initiatives related to ESL are approached. From the large collection of EU and national documents analysed, some trends emerge concerning mainly the reinforcement of the link of labour market with education qualifications and economic competitiveness.

Expected Outcomes

The paper underlines the major changes in the educational agenda with regard to ESL that have been implemented and shows how the European common grammar is nationally reinterpreted. Through this paper on Portuguese policy analysis on ESL, rationales and modes of reconfiguration and/or compliance to European policy implementation following the Lisbon Strategy are identified. The period under consideration (2000-2013) is one in which Portugal has experienced social and educational transformations in part related to governmental changes in the country. Three periods were identified. The adhesion to European Educational policies was probably clearer in the first and second periods, i.e. until 2010. The current period appears to be strongly influenced by the German “dual system” as reflected in the introduction of vocational courses in the expectancy that 13-year-old children—mainly those with ‘learning difficulties’ — would choose them. There is a clear shifting away from a discourse and measures on equal opportunities and from increasing social and economic development, and social inclusion. Presently the main driver focuses on cost reduction and enhancement of the relationship between qualification and a strong rhetoric on the labour market ‘needs’. Europeanisation is taking place on the basis of countries’ diverse interpretation and implementation of the ‘common grammar’ by means of specific national policies. The analysis shows in the Portuguese case, as in others as the UK or the Netherlands, that the economic concern prevails over educational and social goals (Araújo et al 2014).

References

Alexiadou, Nafsika. 2005. “Europeanisation and education policy.” In D. Coulby and E. Zambeta (Eds). World Yearbook of education 2005: Globalization and Nationalism in education, (pp. 106-121), London: Falmer Routledge; Araújo, Helena C., Magalhães, António, Rocha, Cristina & Macedo, Eunice (2014). Policies on Early School Leaving in Nine European Countries: A Comparative Analysis. Antwerp: University of Antwerp. Barroso, João. 2006 (Ed) A regulação das políticas públicas de educação: Espaços, dinâmicas e actores. Lisbon: Educa Dale, Roger. 2007. Globalization and the Rescalling of Educational Governance. In C. A. Torres and A. Teodoro (Eds.) Critique and Utopia: new developments in the sociology of education in the twenty-first century, (pp. 25-42) Plymouth: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers Dale, Roger. 2009. Contexts, constraints and resources in the development of european education space and European education policy. In R. Dale & S. Robertson (Eds.), Globalisation and Europeanisation in education (pp. 23-43). Oxford: Symposium Books Delanty, Gerard. 2014. Introduction: Perspectives on crisis and critique in Europe today. European Journal of Social Theory, 17(3), 207–218 Enjolras, Bernard. 2008. Two hypotheses about the emergence of a post-national european model of citizenship. Citizenship Studies, 12(5), 495-505. Gordon, Andrew and Trevor Stack. 2007. Citizenship beyond the state: Thinking with early modern citizenship in the contemporary world. Citizenship Studies, 11(2), 117-133. Hooghe, Liesbet and Gary Marks. 2001. Multi-level governance and European integration. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield. Landri, Paolo & Neumann, Eszter. 2014. Mobile Sociologies of Education. EERJ, 13(1), 1–8. Lawn, Martin & Grek, Sotiria. 2012. Europeanizing Education: governing a new policy space. Oxford: Symposium Books Magalhães, António, Veiga, Amélia, Ribeiro, Filipa, Sousa, Sofia and Santiago, Rui. 2013. Creating a common grammar for European higher education governance, Higher Education: the international Journal of Higher Education Research, 65, 95–112. Musselin, Christine and Christine Paradise. 2009. “France: From Incremental Transitions to Institutional Change, in C. Paradise, E. Reale, I. Bleiklie and E. Ferlie (Eds). University Governance: Western European Comparative Perspectives, (pp. 23-49), Dordrecht: Springer Nóvoa, António. 2002. Ways of thinking about education in Europe. In A. Nóvoa and M. Lawn (Eds.), Fabricating Europe: The formation of an education space (pp. 131-155). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic. Radaelli, Claudio. 2003. “The europeanization of public policy.” in K. Featherstone and C. Radaelli (Eds.) The politics of Europeanization, pp. 27-56 Oxford: Oxford University Press Rizvi, Fazal and Lingard, Bob. 2010. Globalizing Education Policy, London: Routledge.

Author Information

Helena C Araújo (presenting / submitting)
University of Porto/CIIE/FPCEUPl, Portugal
Eunice Macedo (presenting)
University of Porto/CIIE/FPCEUPl, Portugal
University of Porto/CIPES
University of Porto/CIIE/FPCEUPl, Portugal

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.