Session Information
WERA SES 06 D, International Perspectives on Language, Literacy and Learning
Paper Session
Contribution
The Problem and Research Perspectives.
Considerable attention has been focused, of late, on adolescent performance and achievement on high levels of literacy, reading and writing, across the globe (Czikszentmihalyi, M.; Rathunde, K. & Whalen, S.; Horowitz, 2015). The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (2010) provides a detailed report of performance of adolescents in nations across the world in reading, mathematics, and science, known as the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA). This report identifies nations at various points in time and trends toward high literacy performance. High literacy is described in this paper as the ability to analyze, synthesize, interpret, and evaluate arguments presented in extended discourse in non-narrative text sources including expository, informational sources, and, particularly. persuasive sources. Reading and writing with high literacy appears to have plummeted in many countries in the world. This has serious implications for adolescent students’ performance across all subject areas including achievement in mathematics and science but also the humanities and arts which seem to be less discussed in international reports. The ability to read and write more difficult text that requires high levels of metacognition and analytical skills is necessary for students to advance in school; our research shows that those students who do not succeed at high levels of reading, particularly in urban high schools, choose to drop-out of high school and/or do not pursue the much needed higher education, require for succeeding in the work place. The implications for all nations where there is little high literacy is increased poverty. Particular attention here is given to the reading and writing of argumentation, necessary if students are to function with sound reasoning and clear thinking and, in many locales of the world, achieve and maintain democracy in their nations.
Objectives:
This paper asks the following questions.
What is the status of adolescent reading and writing, in various locales across the world, based on PISA reporting? Which countries are gaining in high levels of literacy performance? To what extent are we examining ability to process and produce argumentation in persuasive sources? Where is there plummeting in reading scores?
What difficulties/obstacles are students across the globe facing in becoming high level readers and writers of persuasion?
What factors have contributed to student success or failure in reading and writing achievements in specific nations? What new standards are being advanced particularly in the United States to raise achievement in reading and writing arguments in persuasive texts?
Method
Expected Outcomes
References
References. Ammermueller, A. & Pischke, J.S. (2006). Peer effects in European primary schools: Evidence from PIRLS. IZA Discussion Paper No. 2077. Retrieved December 10, 2012 from ftp://RePEc/Discussionpaper/dp2077.pdf Berliner, D.C. (2015). Poverty’s powerful effects on reading achievement and the achievement gap. In Horowitz, R. & Samuels, S. J. (Eds.) The achievement gap in reading. New York & London: Routledge/Taylor & Francis. Chua, A. (2011). Battle hymn of the tiger mother. New York: Penguin. Common Core State Standards Initiative (2010). Common Core State Standards for English/Language Arts and Literacy in History/Social Studies, Science, and technical subjects. Retrieved www.corestandards.org/the-standards. Czikszentmihalyi, M.; Rathunde, K. & Whalen, S. (1993). Talented teenagers. The roots of success & failure. New York & Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Elley, W. B. (1992). How in the world do students read? IEA Study of Reading Literacy. International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement. Horowitz, R. (in press). Oral language. The genesis and development of literacy for schooling and everyday life. In P.D. Pearson & E. Hiebert (Eds.). Research based practices for teaching common core literacy. New York: Columbia University. McEwan, P. (2003) Peer effects on student achievement. Evidence from Chile. Economics of Education Review, 22 , 131-41. Stevenson, W. H. & Zusho, A. (2002). Adolescence in China and Japan: Adapting to a changing environment. In Brown, B.B.; Larson, R. W. & Saraswathi, T.S. (Eds.) The world’s youth. Adolescence in eight regions of the globe. (pp. 141-170). New York: Cambridge University Press. Wilkinson, R. & Pickett, K. (2010). The spirit level. Why more equal societies almost always do better. Why equality is better for everyone. London: Penguin.
Search the ECER Programme
- Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
- Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
- Search for authors and in the respective field.
- For planning your conference attendance you may want to use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference
- If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.