Immigrant Children Adaptation into Elementary Schools in the Czech and Norwegian Context
Author(s):
Klara Zaleska (presenting / submitting)
Conference:
ECER 2016
Format:
Paper

Session Information

ERG SES G 04, History, Immigration and Education

Paper Session

Time:
2016-08-23
09:00-10:30
Room:
OB-E2.38 (ALE 4)
Chair:
Sofia Marques da Silva

Contribution

The aim of the project is to identify and to characterize what conditions are created in the Czech and Norwegian schools for immigrant children adaptation and to analyze the role of the key players in this adaptation process. The project presents a dissertation thesis which is a comparative study. The main research questions are: What is the current situation in immigrant children adaptation in Czech and Norwegian schools? And what are the roles of the main actors in the immigrant children adaptation process in the Czech and Norwegian school context?

School adaptation is being traditionally understood as a linear process. And if some difficulties appear in the adaptation process, there were family and/or children who were traditionally blamed (Brizuela and Garcia-Sellers, 1999). There are few drawbacks in this traditional approach which Brizuela and Garcia-Sellers (1999) comments in their work. They call for a broader conceptualization of the term (see their triangulation process, which includes variables related both to child, family and school), as well as McDermott (1987) which claims that adaptation also includes social, political, cultural, affective and cognitive factors that are equally important aspects of the adaptation process. Therefore, in the dissertation thesis I consider the school adaptation for a triangular process as well as Brizuela and Garcia (1999) and for complex process which include wider social, cultural and political context as well as McDermott.

Authors usually talks about the immigrant children as about children with special needs, such as for example Kristin McCarthy (1998) does. She presents several challenges which immigrant pupils have to face in the phase of adapting to the school environment in a foreign country. These challenges are: learning a new language, leaving home, life in two separate worlds, and confrontation with stereotypes. Harrison (1990) argues that the distinction between family environment and school environment creates often stress for the immigrant child because immigrant children often experience a discontinuity between these two important contexts which are important for their further development.

Immigrant children do not always adapt to the major society without any problems. Alvo (1991) conducted a research which says that children who have good results at school and are resistant, have a well-functioning social network composed of parents, friends and teachers who balance the discomfort of new life events. Puerto Rican´s research (1995) on the other hand has showed that when the immigrant children are able to acculturate to the mainstream life, teachers and parents reduce their support and it is often that than there is an increases in using drug and doing crime by immigrant children. In the literature, there are several paradigms that explain why some foreigners adapt to the school environment better than others and why some individuals go through the whole process better than others. This paradigm calls McCarthy (1998) as: developing view, multidimensional model and positivist approach.

These theoretical framework and background are also fundamental for me: Institutional theory, network theory (Masera, 1993), the concept of acculturation strategies (Berry 1992, 2002, 2006), Bourdieu: Culture Capital; Giddens: Models of Integration.

Method

The purpose of comparative studies in pedagogy can be according to Phillips (2006) analysis, description, evaluation and exploration of the current state of the phenomenon in two or more countries. The main motive for doing this comparative study, is as stated Rys (2004): "Trying to learn from the example of other countries. Comparison helps deepen the understanding of the situation in own country, challenges the obviousness of domestic solutions." The whole design of this research is because of the nature of the aims and because of the main research question designed qualitatively. There will be done four case studies of four schools (two in the Czech Republic, 2 in Norway). Selection criterion for school choice is the level of contact with immigrant children (immigrant children are children with different mother tongue). I put on the assumption that the level of contact with immigrants affects the overall process of adaptation. One school in each country will be focused on the recruitment and training of immigrant children, the second will be a regular school, which has experience with several immigrants. Data collection techniques are: documents analysis and interviews with three groups of respondents: teachers, immigrant and major pupils, immigrant parents (possibly supplemented by participant observation). More about Comparative Case research writes Goodrick (2014). How were the units of analysis chosen? According to Bray and Thomas´s challenge to the multi-level analysis of educational processes through which authors reach a multifaceted and holistic analysis of educational phenomena, also I use the Bray and Thomas cube (1995). I (as many other authors) modified the cube to the needs of my research project and it´s topic of Adaptation of Immigrant Children in the Czech and Norwegian schools. Norway as a country for comparison was chosen because of two reasons: 1) Norway (Brochmann, 2006) presents itself as a functioning multicultural society which focuses on the admission of immigrants. 2) An important prerequisite for good research in a foreign country is a knowledge of the language of the majority (Bereday 1964, Phillips, 2006). As a former student of Nordic studies I speak Norwegian. There is no single method of comparative education (Bereday, 1964 Goodrick, 2014 Lor 2011, Phillips, 2006 Rust, 1999, 2003). I come out from a classical Bereday´s four-steps method of comparative analysis from 1964, which has still until today, a lot to offer and which is still widely used in the field of comparative education.

Expected Outcomes

Due to the already extensively studied theoretical materials and the Czech and Norwegian legislation, it clearly stated that Norway is dedicated to the immigrant integration into primary schools systematically, much more than the Czech Republic is. It has to do with the number immigrants in Czech schools which made only 2 % (ČSÚ, 2015) of the whole school population, on the other hand there are 10% immigrant children in Norwegian elementary schools (SSB, 2015). It can be expected that teachers attitude to immigrant children education and teachers training in immigrant children education will be in Norway at a higher level and it will raise up a possibility of inspiration for the Czech environment. The aim of this research is also to compare the children themselves, their parents and their attitude to how they perceive the support that they receive from the majority, from the school. The beg differences are also expected not only between Czech and Norwegian schools and legislation but also between schools focused on immigrant children education and regular schools. The schools focused on immigrant children education should be "ideals", where there should work all that is written in the legislation. I expect big differences in these schools attitude in comparison to the ordinary schools.

References

Bankston, C. and Zhou, M. (1997). The social adjustment of Vietnamese American adolescents: Evidence for a segmented assimilation approach. In Social Science Quarterly, 78, 508 – 523. Berreday (1964) Comparative Method in Education. New York: Holt. Berry, J. W. (1992). Acculturation and Adaptation in a New Society. Available from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1468-2435.1992.tb00776.x/abstract Berry, J. W. (2002). Psychological, Socio-cultural, and Marital Adaptation of Turkish Immigrants. In International Journal of Psychology. 37,13–26. Berry, J. W. (2006). Immigrant Youth: Acculturarion, Identity, and Adaptation. Available from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1464-0597.2006.00256.x/abstract Bray, Adamson, Mason (2007). Comparative Education Research. Approaches and Methods. The University of Hong Kong: Springer. Bray a Thomas (1995). Methodology and Focus in Comparative Education. Available from http://147.8.214.206/f/acadstaff/376/Bray_Methodology_%26_Focus.pdf Brizuela a Garcia-Sellers (1999): School Adaptation: A Triangular Process. Available from http://aer.sagepub.com/content/36/2/345.abstract ČSÚ (2015). Vývoj počtu cizinců v ČR v letech 2004 – 2013. Available from https://www.czso.cz/documents/11292/25687697/c01R01_2013.pdf/6e2eb29d-9102-4707-ad6c-f47f27dcbc06?version=1.0 Goodrick, D. (2014). Comparative Case Studies. In Methodological Briefs Impact Evaluation 9, Florence: UNICEF Office of Research. Lor (2011). International and Comparative Librarianship. Available from https://pjlor.files.wordpress.com/2010/06/chapter-4-draft-2011-04-20.pdf Masery, D. (1993): Theories of International Migration. Available from https://cis.uchicago.edu/outreach/summerinstitute/2011/documents/sti2011-parks-theories_of_international_migration.pdf Mason, M (2007). Different Models, Different Emphases, Different Insights. In Comparative Education Research. Approaches and Methods. The University of Hong Kong: Springer. McDermott, R. P. (1987). The exploration of minority school failure, again. In Anthro-pology and Education Quarterly. 18 (4), 361-364. McCarthy, K. (1998). ADAPTATION OF IMMIGRANT CHILDREN TO THE UNITED STATES: A REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE. Available from http://crcw.princeton.edu/workingpapers/WP98-03-McCarthy.pdf. Phillips, D. (2006). Comparative education: method. In Research in Comparative and International Education. 1(4), 304-319. Rumbaut, R.G. (1997). Paradoxes (and orthodoxies) of assimilation. In Sociological Perspectives. 40, 483 – 511. Rust, V. D., Soumare, A., Pescador, O., Shibuya, M. (1999). Research Strategies in Comparative Education. In Comparative Education Review. 43(1), 86-109. Rust, V. D. (2003) Method and Methodology in Comparative Education. In Comparative education Review. 47(3), 3-7. SSB (2015). ANmeldte lovbrudd. Oslo: Statistic sentralbyra. Available from www.ssb.no/lovbrudda Watson, K. (1998). Memories, Models and Mapping: The Impact of Geopolitical Changes on Comparative Studies in Education. Compare: A Journal of Comparative Education, 28 (1), 5-31.

Author Information

Klara Zaleska (presenting / submitting)
Masaryk University
Department of Educational Sciences
Brno

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.