The Politics of Culture: Education, Identity Formation, and Turkish Origin Youth in Western Europe
Author(s):
Raquel Sáenz (presenting / submitting)
Conference:
ECER 2016
Format:
Paper

Session Information

ERG SES C 13, Culture and Education

Paper Session

Time:
2016-08-22
11:00-12:30
Room:
OB-H2.32
Chair:
Christine Winter

Contribution

In Western Europe, due to the recent refugee crisis, immigration from the Middle East has risen substantially in the past year. In recognition of these socio-political shifts, the education system needs to respond in a way that effectively supports youth coming from these regions and addresses the cultural transformation for youth born in the receiving countries. In the past, immigrant origin students were often funneled into lower vocational tracks at a substantially higher rate than students from the dominant groups (Brinbaum, Monguérou, & Primon, 2010; Glock & Krolak-Schwerdt, 2013; Baysu & Phalet, 2012). This issue, along with other educational inequities, represented a larger systemic failure of European education systems, as well as those of other developed nations, to truly provide equitable educational opportunities for these youth who grow up within systems of oppression in receiving countries where they were treated as perpetual foreigners.

In relation to discrimination, studies have found that Turkish youth are typically more marginalized than other immigrant origin groups in Western Europe (Moldenhawer, 1999). In addition, and likely related, Turkish origin students in particular, compared to other immigrant populations in Europe, are overrepresented in the lowest academic tracks, usually vocational schools (Baysu & Phalet, 2012; Glock and Krolak-Schwerdt, 2013). Higher dropout rates have been cited with this group, compared to other immigrant groups, (Baysu & Phalet, 2012), as well as higher levels of unemployment (Moldehawer, 1999). In France, Turkish origin students have substantially lower percentages in passing the baccalauréat, an academic qualification taken at the end of secondary schooling (lycée): Only 32.9% of Turkish origin youth receive the degree, compared to 50.8% of Maghrebi origin youth (the second lowest percentage), and 64.2% of non-immigrant origin students (Maurin, 2012). In understanding these discrepancies, it is essential to examine the role of societal discrimination within the educational system. This particular factor is one that is essential to examine at this moment in time, in consideration of the current refugee crisis in Europe, as well as the attacks in Paris on November 13, 2015. After the attacks in New York City on September 11, 2001, Islamophobia increased drastically throughout the Western world (Taylor, 2009). A similar effect has already been evident after the attacks in Paris, which demands a response on the part of the educational systems in Europe to combat this unjust marginalization.

This review of the research seeks to analyze the role of the education system in relation to Turkish immigrant origin youth, as documented within refereed research. The review was undertaken with the goal of reviewing pedagogical approaches that have been effective or ineffective with these youth in order to develop recommendations for educators that teach Middle Eastern origin youth. The central question that this review seeks to answer is: What does educational research say about the role of the education system in the growing disenfranchisement of Turkish youth? Within this larger question, there will be a focus of how different educational systems and programs have promoted or suppressed the cultures of Turkish origin youth, understanding culture as political in nature. 

Method

This meta-analysis of the research is currently a work in progress, which will be completed by April 2016. As a review of literature, databases such as ERIC, PsychInfo, and JSTOR, among others, were used. In the initial search, the search term “Teaching Turkish immigrants” was used. In the second round of searching in the same databases, the search terms were refined to “Turk*” AND “immigr* OR second generation” AND “teach* OR pupil”. Further research will also be extended to larger educational contexts, such as private and public schools, as well as community contexts. Research conducted in Turkey was excluded from this review in order to focus on the immigration context. The geographic limitation of Western Europe was established in order to achieve cohesiveness in historical and social contexts, as well as in consideration of the current socio-political importance of this region in relation to issues of immigration from the Middle East. In consideration of the focus on Turkish youth, this was a population that has a longer history of migration to Western Europe than many other Middle Eastern immigrant populations. The European Economic Community (including at the time Germany, Belgium, the Netherlands, France, the United Kingdom, and other Western European countries), as well as Denmark, signed guest worker agreements with Turkey in the 1960s (Palmer, 2013; Hedetoft, 2006). The literature will be contextualized within the larger context of globalization and the history of Turkish immigration in Western Europe, as well as the current refugee crisis. This socio-political contextualization will serve to further highlight the politicization of culture and the complexity of issues of integration and assimilation, contrasted against those of cultural maintenance. Psychological frameworks on identity will be used to further analyze the developmental fit of different educational programs and approaches mentioned by authors in the synthesis.

Expected Outcomes

Overall, this review of the literature seeks to examine how educational research is contending with schools as a key place of cultural interface. Based on the literature found thus far, there seems to be a tendency of the education system to contribute to the further disenfranchisement of Turkish origin youth, more so for young men than young women. It is projected that the majority of educational models will have a focus on integration and assimilation. However, in the context of psychosocial development in relation to ethnic identity, it has generally been found that a strong ethnic identity acts as a protective factor, as well as one that can have a positive impact on self-esteem, resilience, and educational outcomes for some ethnic groups (Oyserman, Harrison, & Bybee, 2001). Despite the positive impact of a strong ethnic identity, it is expected that most academic programs will focus heavily on assimilation and integration, which imply a loss of heritage culture. Similarly, it is anticipated that educational programs that do not take into account students’ cultural backgrounds will not be effective in promoting Turkish students’ academic success nor in bridging the growing inequities faced by youth from this population. Furthermore, it is also probable that social discrimination will play a role in educational outcomes, further inhibiting successful results among Turkish origin youth and forestalling cultural transformation of European societies at large.

References

Baysu, G., & Phalet, K. (2012). Staying on or dropping out? The role of intergroup friendship and perceived teacher support in minority and nonminority school careers. Teachers College Record, 114(5), 25. Brinbaum, Y., Monguérou, L., & Primon, J.L. (2010). Educational trajectories and experiences of young descendants of immigrants in France. In C. Beauchemin, C. Hamel, & P. Simon (Eds.), Documents de travail 168, Trajectories and origins: Survey on population diversity in France (pp. 45-52). Paris: INED/INSEE. Crijnen, A. A. M., Bengi-Arslan, L., & Verhulst, F. C. (2000). Teacher-reported problem behaviour in Turkish immigrant and Dutch children: A cross-cultural comparison. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 102(6), 439–444. Crul, M. (2002). Success breeds success: Moroccan and Turkish student mentors in the Netherlands. International Journal for the Advancement of Counselling, 24, 275-287. Glock, S., & Krolak-Schwerdt, S. (2013). Does nationality matter? The impact of stereotypical expectations on student teachers’ judgments. Social Psychology of Education: An International Journal, 16(1), 111–127. Kurban, F., & Tobin, J. (2009). “They don’t like us”: Reflections of Turkish children in a German preschool. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 10(1), 24–34. Maurin, L. (2012). Les enfants d’immigrés réussissent mieux à l’école que les autres! Diversité: ville, école, integration, 168, 22-24. Moldenhawer, B. (1999). Turkish and Kurdish speaking teachers in the Danish folkeskole: The ambiguous concept of equality. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 43(4), 349–369. Oyserman, D., Harrison, K., & Bybee, D. (2001). Can racial identity be promotive of academic efficacy? International Journal of Behavioral Development, 25(4), 379-385. Stevens, G. W. J. M., Pels, T., Bengi-Arslan, L., Verhulst, F. C., Vollebergh, W. A. M., & Crijnen, A. A. M. (2003). Parent, teacher and self-reported problem behavior in the Netherlands: Comparing Moroccan immigrant with Dutch and with Turkish immigrant children and adolescents. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 38(10), 576–585. Taylor, S. K. (2009). Right pedagogy/wrong language and caring in times of fear? Issues in the schooling of ethnic Kurdish children in Denmark. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 12(3), 291–307. Thomauske, N. (2011). The relevance of multilingualism for teachers and immigrant parents in early childhood education and care in Germany and France. Intercultural education, 22(4), 327-336. Zwirs, B., Burger, H., Schulpen, T., Vermulst, A. A., HiraSing, R. A., & Buitelaar, J. (2011). Teacher ratings of children’s behavior problems and functional impairment across gender and ethnicity: Construct equivalence of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 42(3), 466–481.

Author Information

Raquel Sáenz (presenting / submitting)
Boston College
Curriculum and Instruction
Brighton

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.