Career Success of Preschool Teachers – The Significance of the Big Five Personality Traits, Internal Locus of Control, and Occupational Self-Efficacy
Author(s):
Wilfried Smidt (presenting / submitting) Susanna Roux
Conference:
ECER 2016
Format:
Paper

Session Information

10 SES 02 D, On Being a Teacher

Paper Session

Time:
2016-08-23
15:15-16:45
Room:
NM-J112
Chair:
ML White

Contribution

Career success, which is often defined in terms of objective and subjective career success, is considered to be important, not only from a society’s and an economic point of view, but also as a component of a successful individual lifestyle (Abele, 2002). With regard to possible predictors of career success, the significance of individual and organizational characteristics has been discussed in the international literature. A meta-analysis conducted by Ng, Eby, Sorensen, and Feldman (2005) suggested that there are organizational characteristics, human capital variables, sociodemographics, and stable individual difference variables that may predict objective and subjective career success. The present study emphasizes the last component by aiming to investigate whether individual difference variables in terms of the Big Five personality traits (agreeableness, conscientiousness, extraversion, neuroticism, openness; McCrae & Costa, 1996), internal locus of control (internal LOC, Rotter, 1966), and occupational self-efficacy (Bandura, 1997) could predict the objective and subjective career success of preschool teachers. Previous research covering various occupations has shown that the Big Five, internal LOC, and occupational self-efficacy are related to career success (e.g., Judge & Kammeyer-Mueller, 2007). However, there is a lack of research on preschool teachers. The absence of perspectives of career success in preschool teachers is considered to be a potential barrier to the ability to provide a high-quality education to children; that is, difficult working conditions (e.g., high workload, but also characteristics of the teachers) may prevent pedagogues from providing a high-quality education to preschool children (Barnett, 2004). Difficult working conditions may also lead to a decrease in job satisfaction, which has been shown to be related to job performance (Judge, Thoresen, Bono, & Patton, 2001). Research has also suggested that a lack of career success in terms of experience of a large amount of on-the-job stress may lead to job burnout (Alarcon, Eschleman, & Bowling, 2009). Against this background, the investigation of predictors of the career success of preschool teachers is becoming increasingly important, particularly with regard to the Big Five, internal LOC, and occupational self-efficacy, for which the research gap is considerably large. The present study aims to address this lack of research by examining the extent to which the Big Five, LOC, and occupational self-efficacy are predictive of the objective and subjective career success of preschool teachers in Germany. On the basis of previous theoretical and empirical work we derived hypotheses that each point to effects that should hold even when several other predictors (organizational characteristics, human capital variables, sociodemographics) have been taken into account. We hypothesized the following:

  • Conscientiousness will positively predict objective (H1a) and subjective career success (H1b).
  • Extraversion will positively predict objective (H2a) and subjective career success (H2b).
  • Neuroticism will negatively predict objective (H3a) and subjective career success (H3b).
  • Internal LOC will positively predict objective (H4a) and subjective career success (H4b).
  • Occupational self-efficacy will positively predict objective (H5a) and subjective career success (H5b).

Regarding agreeableness and openness, previous findings have not provided consistent empirical evidence for their relations to career success. Therefore, the investigation of these relations was only exploratory.

Method

The study is part of a German longitudinal study on the labor market entry and career development of educational staff in childhood education. The study involved a longitudinal survey, designed as a standardized web survey with the offer to take a paper-pencil questionnaire instead. The study participation was voluntary. We used data captured in two waves. The first wave, which was collected at the end of the training or course of studies and consisted of 4,658 students attending 155 non-academic colleges of social pedagogy and 46 universities, took place in two cohorts during the months of June to October, 2012, as well as January to April, 2013. The second wave, which consisted of 1,075 participants, was carried out in autumn, 2013, about 15 months (first cohort) or three months (second cohort) after the participants had completed their training or studies. Because the study focused specifically on preschool teachers, and measures from both waves were used, depending on the variable, the sample sizes ranged from n = 495 to n = 560. Objective career success was operationalized as weekly working time, permanent position, and leadership position. Subjective career success was surveyed with a scale that asked about perceived stress (Siegrist et al., 2004; six items, α = .78). Job satisfaction as an additional measure of subjective career success was evaluated according to Krüger et al. (2003) with 15 items (α = .88). The Big Five were assessed with a 15 items containing Big Five questionnaire (BFI-S, Gerlitz & Schupp, 2005). The Cronbach’s alpha of the Big Five were acceptable (α = .68 to α = .78) with the exception of agreeableness (α = .55). Furthermore, occupational self-efficacy (Abele, Stief, & Andrä, 2000; six items, α = .72) and internal LOC (Jakoby & Jacob, 1999; three items, α = .64) were evaluated. Gender, age, immigration background, parenthood, cohort membership, graduation, employment before or during the training, and size of the preschool were used as control variables. To predict objective career success, a linear regression analysis with “weekly working time” as the dependent variable and binary logistic regressions with “permanent position” and “leadership position” as the dependent variables were calculated. Subjective career success was predicted via linear regression analyses with “perceived stress” and “job satisfaction” as the dependent variables. Participants with missing data were excluded; therefore, the sample size decreased to n = 451 or n = 452, depending on the outcome variable.

Expected Outcomes

With regard to objective career success, the findings revealed that there was no support for the expected relations in most of the cases. After controlling for several other variables, conscientiousness (H1a) was not related to objective career success in this sample, although there was an effect on the chance of holding a leadership position that just failed to reach the 5% significance level (p = .053). In addition, extraversion, neuroticism, and occupational self-efficacy were not related to objective career success; thus, there was no support for H2a, H3a, or H5a. The only statistically significant exception was internal LOC: Preschool teachers with a higher internal LOC had a higher chance of obtaining a leadership position (Odds Ratio = 1.94, p <. 05); thus, there was partial support for H4a. Most of the variance, however, was explained by the control variables. In contrast to the prediction of objective career success, the impact of some of the personality measures on subjective career success was relatively strong. In detail, the findings revealed that conscientiousness was not related to subjective career success in the expected direction but unexpectedly corresponded with higher perceived stress (β = .13, p < .05). Thus, there was no support for H1b. Furthermore, extraversion and internal LOC did not predict subjective career success; consequently, there was no support for H2b and H4b. However, higher neuroticism predicted higher perceived stress (β = .25, p < .001); hence, there was some support for H3b. Finally, revealing relatively strong effects, the findings indicated that higher occupational self-efficacy corresponded with lower perceived stress (β = -.30, p < .001) and higher job satisfaction (β = .29, p < .001); thus, there was support for H5b. Contrary to objective career success, the variance explained by the control variables was small.

References

Abele, A. E. (2002). Ein Modell und empirische Befunde zur beruflichen Laufbahnentwicklung unter besonderer Berücksichtigung des Geschlechtsvergleichs [A theoretical model and empirical findings on occupational career development with a social emphasis on gender]. Psychologische Rundschau, 53(3), 109-118. Abele, A. E., Stief, M., & Andrä, M. S. (2000). Zur ökonomischen Erfassung beruflicher Selbstwirksamkeitserwartungen – Neukonstruktion einer BSW-Skala [On the economic assessment of occupational self-efficacy expectations – A new BSW scale]. Zeitschrift für Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie, 44(3), 145-151. Alarcon, G. M., Eschleman, K. J., & Bowling, N. A. (2009). Relationships between personality variables and burnout: A meta-analysis. Work and Stress, 23, 244–263. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy. The exercise of control. New York: Freeman. Barnett, S. W. (2004). Better teachers, better preschools: Student achievement linked to teacher qualifications. New Brunswick: National Institute for Early Education and Research. Gerlitz, Y., & Schupp, J. (2005). Zur Erhebung der Big-Five-basierten Persönlichkeitsmerkmale im SOEP [Assessment of the Big Five personality traits in the SOEP]. German Institute of Economic Research. Berlin: DIW. Jakoby, N., & Jacob, R. (1999). Messung von internen und externen Kontrollüberzeugungen in allgemeinen Bevölkerungsumfragen [Assessment of internal and external locus of control in a population survey]. ZUMA-Nachrichten, 45(23), 61-71. Judge, T. A., Higgins, C. A., Thoresen, C. J., & Barrick, M. R. (1999). The Big Five personality traits, general mental ability, and career success across the life span. Personnel Psychology, 52(3), 621-652. Judge, T. A., & Kammeyer-Mueller, J. D. (2007). Personality and career success. In H. Gunz & M. Peiperl (Eds.), Handbook of career studies (pp. 59-78). Thousand Oaks: Sage. Krüger, H.-H., Rauschenbach, T., Fuchs, K., Grunert, C. Huber, A., Kleifgen, B., … Züchner, I. (2003). Diplom-Pädagogen in Deutschland. Survey 2001 [Graduated pedagogues in Germany. Survey 2001]. Weinheim: Juventa. McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T., Jr. (1996). Toward a new generation of personality theories: Theoretical contexts for the five-factor model. In J. S. Wiggins (Ed.), The five-factor model of personality: Theoretical perspectives (pp. 51-87). New York: Guilford Press. Ng, T. W. H., Eby, L. T., Sorensen, K. L., & Feldman, D. C. (2005). Predictors of objective and subjective career success: a meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 58(2), 367-408. Rotter, J. B. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs, 80, 609. Siegrist, J., Starke, D., Chandola, T., Godin, I., Marmot, M., Niedhammer, I., …Peter, R. (2004). The measurement of effort-reward imbalance at work: European comparisons. Social Science & Medicine, 58(8), 1483-1499.

Author Information

Wilfried Smidt (presenting / submitting)
University of Innsbruck
Innsbruck
University of Education Weingarten, Germany

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.