Is Italy Leading Inclusion? Teachers' Inclusive Attitudes And The Gap Between Values And Practice, A Critical Perspective.
Author(s):
Donatella Camedda (presenting / submitting)
Conference:
ECER 2016
Format:
Paper

Session Information

04 SES 11 A, How do Teachers do Inclusive Education? Different Perspectives

Paper Session

Time:
2016-08-25
17:15-18:45
Room:
OB-H2.20
Chair:
Gunilla Lindqvist

Contribution

Italy has been broadly recognised to be a leader in Europe and all over the world for its inclusive school system (Kanter et al. 2014). Having the highest percentage of student with disabilities attending regular schools (OECD 2004, Santi 2014, Ianes et al. 2014, Anastasiou et al. 2015) the Italian school system is regulated by laws and norms that support the right to education of every student, independently from any disadvantage, i.e. disabilities, cultural difference, socio-economic. The history of integrazione scolastica (school integration) started in the early ‘70ies and is now facing the challenge of change towards inclusion, requiring support from research on this issue. Although  teachers' attitudes towards inclusion have been largely investigated (Avradimis & Norwich 2002), Italy counts a lack of studies on this topic, therefore, research on inclusive attitudes needs to be increased within the Italian background, where the concept of inclusion is still mainly related with disability and special education (Camedda 2015). Literature shows that, despite the experience of inclusive good practice during almost 40 years of integrazione scolastica, there is a perpetuation of micro-exclusion (D’Alessio 2012) of some students in the Italian school settings. The investigation proposed focuses on teachers’ inclusive attitudes, exploring their understanding of inclusion in education. Specifically, this study aims to identify the relations between inclusive values and practice adopting a critical approach, in order to find significant elements involved in the traditional ‘inclusive’ Italian school system and the perpetuation of intra-exclusion of some students. The research questions are:

- how teachers understand inclusion?

- which are the significant relations between values, teacher education and teaching practice in developing inclusive attitudes?

- which are the elements that promote or impede the passage from attitudes to practice?

Underpinning a theoretical framework connected to the concept of inclusion and the Education for all movement (UNESCO, 2000), Index for Inclusion (Booth & Ainscow, 2011) and Inclusive Pedagogy (Spratt & Florian, 2013), the main questions of the research are focused on critical elements involved into the development of inclusive attitudes, exploring the relationship between values, teacher education and practice (Forlin et al., 2011). The concept of inclusion is thus interpreted as a right-based process in order to guarantee a basic quality lifelong education for all the people, independently from any individual, social or economical disadvantage (i.e. disability, cultural diversity, socio-economic status). Reducing and eliminating barriers to participation is a key principle for an inclusive teaching approach (Santi & Ghedin, 2012), as well as putting inclusive values into action against every kind of exclusion within the classroom or within the school (Booth and Ainscow, 2011).

The inclusive pedagogy approach (Florian & Black-Hawkins, 2010), remarked in this study, focuses on the important role of the teachers that could be inclusive in their classroom using a vary range of strategies in response to the students’ difference. To do this, teachers have to adopt and develop, during their education, inclusive attitudes based on the respect of diversity as a natural human beings features (Florian & Linklater, 2010). In Italy, the idea of inclusive education is often translated into differentiation for some students that can’t follow the main lesson; the inclusive pedagogy’s perspective considers that approach not really inclusive but still belonging to a special education style. Inclusive pedagogy’s perspective proposes a wider meaning of inclusion that is not only related to include students with disability in a regular school system (special education), but concerns the response to every kind of differences of the students avoiding to mark or label the single student because of his/her diversity.

Furthermore, the research here presented aims to study the inclusive attitudes of teachers through the guide of six aspects of understanding, developed within the backward design model (Wiggins and McTighe, 2005). 

Method

The study has been conducted through a qualitative approach, utilising art based interviews: starting from a picture of a Kandinskij's painting (Circles in a circle) the interview model is structured in 6 questions; each question covers one of the six facets of Understanding (explain; interpret; apply; perspective; empathise; self-knowledge) developed into the Backward Design (Wiggins & McTighe 2005), a teaching design method that has been applied to the theoretical framework in order to adopt a more pedagogical approach in studying attitudes. The visual board and the question board, used for interviewing, facilitated a non formal interaction. Every question intends to investigate one specific aspect of Understanding, giving a global view of the attitudes expressed by the interviewees. Moreover, the method of inquiry on inclusive attitudes, chosen for this study, belongs to the indirect and implicit strategy that allows to reach information about attitudes without using direct questions related to any sort of evaluation (Oskamp & Schultz 2005). The participants were 26 teachers of 4 different school rankings K13 (pre-school 3-6 aged*, primary school 6-11*, secondary school 1st level 11-14*, secondary school 2nd level 14-18*) attending a university course of specialization in Support Teaching. Participants have been recruited through a call on the Course online platform, giving general information about the study and its purpose. Those teachers were already in service (5 at pre-schools, 6 at primary school, 9 at secondary school 1st level and 6 at secondary school 2nd level) while attending a Specialization Course in Support Teaching, run by State Universities, to be qualified in teaching students with disabilities. All the interviewees were volunteers and have given their consent to be recorded during the interview. After the transcription of all the recordings, data analysis has ben proceeded using a theme coding and networking with Atlas.ti software. The method used for the analysis was a combination of a top-down and bottom-up approach.

Expected Outcomes

Interestingly, although the concept of inclusion in Italy is mostly linked with disability, one of the outcomes of the research shows that teachers consider inclusion as a broader concept, relating everybody and not only connected with students with disabilities or other kind of difficulties. This aspect is also connected to teacher education towards an inclusive perspective, recognisable as a crucial variable in developing and changing teachers’ inclusive attitudes. In fact, knowledge combined with school experience can influence the understanding of inclusion. Considering that Italy has an inclusive school system since 1977, what is also interesting is that many teachers point out that there is still no authentic inclusion in schools, due to many factors that are individual, cultural and political. Particularly, the school system and its structure (organization, management, curriculum etc.) were indicated as aspects impeding inclusion and the last legislative interventions in terms of Bisogni Educativi Speciali (Special Educational Needs) were seen as a step backwards and not leading an inclusive system. Despite teachers’ demonstrated inclusive attitudes in their responses, the findings point out a gap between teachers’ attitudes and everyday practice in schools. What is emerging from the outcomes of the study is that the process from integrazione scolastica to inclusion needs to be further investigated within the Italian background, promoting comparative or cross-cultural studies with other European Countries that are facing, or have recently faced, the shift from a segregated school system to an inclusive one. In that respect, the results of this research will be considered to develop a further research at a international level, involving other countries across Europe.

References

Anastasiou, D., Kauffman, J. M., & Di Nuovo, S. (2015). Inclusive education in Italy: description and reflections on full inclusion. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 30(4), 429-443. Avramidis, E. & Norwich, B. (2002) Teachers' attitudes towards integration / inclusion: a review of the literature, European Journal of Special Needs Education, 17:2, 129-147 Booth, T. & Ainscow, M. (2011) Index for Inclusion, developing learning and participation in school, CSIE, UK Camedda, D. (2015). Come ali di farfalla. L'incontro tra disabilità e migrazione nella prospettiva di una scuola inclusiva. Aracne Editrice. D’Alessio, S. (2012). Inclusive education in Italy: A critical analysis of the policy of integrazione scolastica (Vol. 10). Springer Science & Business Media. Florian, L. & Black-Hawkins, K. (2010) Exploring inclusive pedagogy. British Educational Research Journal, 37(5), 813-828 Florian, L. & Linklater, H. (2010) Preparing teachers for inclusive education: using inclusive pedagogy enhance teaching and learning for all. Cambridge Journal of Education, 40:4, 369-386 Forlin, C., Earle, C., Loreman, T., Sharma (2011) The sentiments, attitudes, and concerns about inclusive education revised (sacie-r) scale for measuring pre-service teachers’ perception about inclusion. Exceptionality education international, 21(3), 50-65 Ianes, D., Demo, H., Zambotti, F. (2014). Integration in Italian schools: teachers' perceptions regarding day-to-day practice and its effectiveness. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 18:6, pp. 626-653. Norwich, B. (2015). Inclusive education in Italy: a response to Anastasiou, Kauffman and Di Nuovo. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 30(4), 448-451. OECD (2004). Students with disabilities, difficulties, disadvantages. Statistics and indicators for curriculum access and equity (Special Educational Needs). Oskamp, S. & Schultz, P.W (2005), Attitudes and Opinions, Psychology Press. Santi, M. & Ghedin, E. (2012) Evaluating the commitment toward inclusion: a multidimensional Repertoire. Giornale Italiano della Ricerca, anno V, , 99-111 Santi, M. (2014). Se l'inclusione sfida il sostegno: note a margine di un percorso formativo. Italian Journal of Special Education for Inclusion. II(2), pp.191-210. Spratt, J., & Florian, L. (2013). Applying the principles of inclusive pedagogy in initial teacher education: from university based course to classroom action. Número Monográfico, 133. Wiggins, G. P., & McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by design. Ascd.

Author Information

Donatella Camedda (presenting / submitting)
University of Padova, University of Edinburgh
Edinburgh

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.