Transitions in Beginning Teachers Professional Learning
Author(s):
Mark Hadfield (presenting / submitting) James Snook (presenting) Yvonne Barnes Mark Connolly
Conference:
ECER 2016
Format:
Paper

Session Information

10 SES 02 C, Teaching Identity, Teacher Learning

Paper Session

Time:
2016-08-23
15:15-16:45
Room:
NM-C214
Chair:
Itxaso Tellado

Contribution

The issues faced by Beginning Teachers (BTs), that is those within their first three years of starting their careers, have been of widespread interest to researchers, practitioners, and policy makers across Europe (OECD, 2009). This interest is based upon the significance given to this career phase with regard to a range of issues including; teacher retention (OECD, 2005), the quality of teaching (Jensen et al 2012), professional socialization and enculturation, and identity development and self-efficacy (Flores and Day, 2006). Concerns have also been raised that this early career stage can have a formative impact upon attitudes to professional learning and longer-term effects on professional growth (Timperley, 2013).

 

Research on the professional learning experiences of Beginning Teachers has generally been set within a ‘transition’ paradigm. A transition with regard to not only them moving from being novices towards becoming experts but also in the nature of their learning experiences. Beginning Teachers agency as learner is constructed as being in transition as they move from being students on initial teacher education programmes to practitioners learning in the social contexts of schools. A transition which is often facilitated by formal and informal induction  processes (Howe, 2006; Wang et al 2008) within which very different mentoring and support roles may be enacted by school based colleagues and external mentors (Hobson et al 2009; Ingersoll and Strong, 2011; Richeter, 2013; Kemmis et al 2014).

 

This paper explores the nature of the transitions in BTs professional learning from a somewhat different perspective. It is based upon a study of some 1,400 BTs enrolled in a masters Level Programme, provided by an alliance of 4 HEIs funded by the Welsh Government, the Masters in Educational Practice (MEP). The MEP was designed to be inquiry based, and, in order to be delivered cost effectively on a national scale, to use a ‘blended’ learning approach. This blend involved teaching materials hosted on a virtual learning environment which supported a degree of on-line interaction, school-based mentoring by a team of over a hundred specially trained external mentors, and a limited number of face-to-face sessions.

 

The team responsible for the programme adopted a number of design principles.  Firstly, it was to be based on teachers’ developing their ability to self-direct and manage processes through which they created professional knowledge and improved their decision making (Timperley, 2011). Secondly, inquiry would be integrated into the programme via a series of increasingly complex practice change sequences. This would allow time for the developments in teachers’ knowledge and beliefs to arise from critical reflection on outcomes as well as from engagement with new theories and ideas. Thirdly, the programme would be adaptive to the teachers’ needs and interests at the level of practice. Finally, the blended approach addressed not only different mediums for learning but also to how to blend different modes of learning.

 

 

The overarching research questions that frame the paper are:

 

  • What was the nature of the Beginning Teachers engagement with key elements of an inquiry based approach to professional learning such as critical reflection, integration of formal theories, and use of data?
  • What was the changing nature of the role adopted by the external mentors and how did this affect Beginning Teachers engagement in professional learning and practice innovation?
  • What appeared to be the key contextual influences upon Beginning Teachers engagement with the MEP and broader professional development activities?

 

These questions will be answered within the context of a Welsh education system marked by concerns over the quality of initial teacher education, the depth and rigour of school based induction processes, and the availability of appropriate professional development opportunities. 

Method

The data drawn on for this paper arose out of an ongoing evaluation of the MEP programme. This theory based evaluation commenced in early 2015 and is due to complete at the end of 2017. The data used in this paper arose from the following activities. a) Teacher Survey Between April and June 2015 all teachers who remained on the programme were surveyed. In total 612 completed surveys were returned, which contributed to a response rate of 73%. These survey focused upon their experience of initial teacher education, the perceived impact of involvement on the programme on their practice, their engagement in professional development in schools, and their views on their mentors. b) Focus group interview Separate focus groups were carried out with the all key participants within the programme: Teachers - Between April and June 2015, nine focus group interviews were conducted with teachers on the MEP. In total, some 50 teachers took part of which fourteen taught in primary schools; three of them identified their schools as 3-16 school type (both primary and secondary); seven taught in special schools and 24 in secondary schools. Mentors - In May and June 2015 three focus group interviews were carried out involving some 25 mentors who had worked with all three cohorts Academic staff - In October 2015 another two focus group interviews were conducted one with academic tutors and the other group with Lead Mentors. c) Case studies Between June 2015 to February 2016 cases studies were carried out of teachers in six different schools. The teachers were selected from Cohort 1 and covered different school types – three were in primary schools and another three in secondary. The focus of the case studies was upon their final year extended projects which were inquiries into aspects of their current classroom practice. The case studies involved interviews with teachers, colleagues including where appropriate their line managers, external mentors and academic tutors. Documentary analysis of inquiry portfolios were also undertaken.

Expected Outcomes

The initial analytical framework used to explore BTs engagement in critical reflection, integration of theory and use of data was an adaptation of Clarke and Hollingsworth’s (2002) ‘Integrated Model of Teacher Professional Growth’. The basic model encompasses the main aspects of the inquiry process, as it incorporates practice change, the development of new professional theories, and the exploration of outcomes within classrooms. The main findings from the study consider: • The use of formal theory as a means of challenging current assumptions, in directing attention towards educationally significant aspects of their classroom contexts and interactions, and the incremental developments of professional theories. • How inquiry can re-focus BTs reflective attentions towards the nature of pupils’ learning and their ‘successes’ based on the introduction of processes and tasks that encouraged the use of a more expansive notion of pupil data. • The nature of the mentoring practices that students associated with professional learning and practice improvement. These varied depending upon BTs motivations for joining the MEP, their understanding of mentoring, and their ability to utilise the relationship effectively. • The changing nature of the type of support mentees sought from the mentoring relationship and how this was related to improvements in their ability to understand and apply learning from inquiries to their teaching. • A discussion of two contextual factors that inhibited professional learning, unsupportive school environments and the turbulent nature of the employment status of BTs.

References

Clarke, D. and Hollingsworth, H. (2002) Elaborating a model of teacher professional growth. Teaching and Teacher Education 1 (8) 947–967. Flores, M.A. and Day, C. (2006). Contexts which shape and reshape new teachers’ identities: A multi-perspective study. Teaching and Teacher Education, 22 , 219– 232. OECD (2005) Teachers matter: attracting developing and retaining effective teachers. Paris: OECD publications OECD (2009) Creating Effective Teaching and Learning Environments: First Results from TALIS, OECD, Paris. OECD Hobson, A. Ashby, P. Malderez, A. and Tomlinson, P. ( 2009) Mentoring beginning teachers: What we know and what we don't. Teaching And Teacher Education 25 (1) 207-16. Hobson, A. Ashby, Mcintyre, P. and Malderez, A. (2010) International approaches to teacher selection and recruitment. Paris: OECD Hobson, A., A. Malderez, L. Tracey, M.S. Giannakaki, K. Kerr, R.G. Pell, G.N. Chambers, P.D. Tomlinson and T. Roper. (2006). Becoming a teacher: Student teachers’ experiences of initial teacher training in England. Notttingham: Department for Education and Skills. Howe, E.R. (2006). Exemplary teacher induction: An international review. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 38 (3), 287–297. Ingersoll, R.M. & Strong, M. (2011). The impact of induction and mentoring programs for beginning teachers: A critical review of the research. Review of Educational Research, 81 (2), 201–233. Jensen, B., Sandoval-Hernández, A., Knoll, S., & Gonzalez, E. (2012). The Experience of New Teachers: Results from TALIS 2008. Paris: OECD Kemmis, S. Heikkinen, H.L.T. Fransson, G. Aspors, J. and Edwards-Groves, C. (2014) Mentoring of new teachers as a contested practice: Supervision, support and collaborative self-development. Teaching and Teacher Education 43 154-164. Richter, D., Kunter, M., Lüdtke, O., Klusmann, U., Anders, Y., & Baumert, J. (2013) How different mentoring approaches affect beginning teachers’ development in the first years of practice. Teaching and Teacher Education, 36, 166-177. Wang, J., Odell, S., & Schwille, S. (2008). Effects of teacher induction on beginning teachers' teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 59(2), 132-152.

Author Information

Mark Hadfield (presenting / submitting)
Cardiff University
Cardiff
James Snook (presenting)
Cardiff University, United Kingdom
Cardiff University, United Kingdom
Cardiff University
Cardiff

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.