Looked-After Children’s Experience Of PE And School Sport In England: Examining Professional And Young People’s Perspectives.
Author(s):
Chloe Woodhouse (presenting / submitting) Rachel Sandford
Conference:
ECER 2016
Format:
Paper

Session Information

ERG SES C 07, Children and Education

Paper Session

Time:
2016-08-22
11:00-12:30
Room:
OB-E2.18
Chair:
Alison Neilson

Contribution

This paper reports findings from an ongoing doctoral project which seeks to explore the PE and School Sport (PESS) experiences of looked-after children within England. ‘Looked-after children’ is the legislative term in England for all children and young people who are removed from their natural family setting and are looked after by a local authority. Internationally, this population of children may also be referred to as children in care or youth in residential/foster care. Despite this linguistic variation across nations and the differences in the social care/child protection systems, international literature relating to this group of children identifies many areas of commonality (relating to family backgrounds, needs and opportunities) and therefore has relevance across countries (e.g. Jackson et al., 2011).

 

It has long been established that looked-after children fall within the most disadvantaged groups in society and are often vulnerable individuals who are immediately susceptible to poorer life chances, including their educational and life achievements (Amadeo and Marshall, 2013). Armour and colleagues (2011) remind us that we must not think of looked-after children as a ‘homogeneous group’ as each looked-after child or young person will have experienced a different life trajectory. Indeed the education, careers, health and well-being of looked-after children and young people is almost solely shaped by what happens to them at home, school and community; yet unlike the rest of the childhood population, looked-after children have often suffered some form of abuse and/or neglect prior to their entry into care, making them the most vulnerable children in Britain (Sempik et al., 2008). Research has shown that, as a group, looked-after children are at risk of a number of poor outcomes (e.g. poor health and low academic achievement) and it is agreed that action is needed to address the problem (Broad and Monaghan, 2003). Literature suggests that sport and physical activity (PA) can be a provider of certain protective factors. Although arguments exist as to why it should not be considered a panacea for all deep rooted social problems (e.g. Bailey, 2007), for young people in particular, an international body of research has focused on the benefits of experiencing positive sport/PA to facilitate in reducing youth crime and substance abuse, reengaging disadvantaged youth and promoting resilience. However, few studies have considered the role of sport/PA in the lives of looked-after children, and none to date have explored the role of schools’ contribution by way of PESS. For example, studies within and outside of the UK, the focus has been on a more generalised account of their leisure provision (e.g. Safvenbom and Sarndahl, 2000), extra-curricular activities (see Farineau and McWey, 2011) or sport/PA pursuits (Quarmby, 2014).  Given the perceived capacity of sport/PA to contribute to young people’s positive development, it is argued that PESS may have an important role to play in looked-after children’s educational experiences (Armour et al., 2011) and it has been suggested that more research is needed to further understanding in this area (Quarmby, 2014). This paper examines the perspectives of professionals and the experiences of young people in care in order to identify the opportunities, barriers and benefits associated with PESS for looked-after children.

The paper draws upon a number of theoretical and conceptual elements, largely based around the broader components of positive youth development (PYD) (Lerner et al., 2005) and that of the socio-ecological model (McLeroy et al., 1988). It is argued that combining the two theoretical perspectives may allow for a deeper understanding of individual contributing factors and the additional external influences of the family, schools, community and policy that may impact on looked-after children’s experience of PESS.

Method

The research adopts a qualitative multiple method approach through the use of online surveys (for local authority professionals and PE teachers), individual interviews (with professionals, practitioners and young people) and group interviews (with young people). To date, there has been one survey completed by 40 local authority professionals. Virtual School Headteachers (VSH) were the target audience for this due to their statutory role in all local authorities in England, whereby they have the responsibility for monitoring and promoting the education of children in care. Ten follow-up individual interviews were then conducted with those who completed the survey, whereby 6 out of the 9 regions across England were represented. A recent review of children in care within research contexts reported a consistent finding of differences between children and adults in their understanding and prioritising of key issues; emphasising the need for youth voice within research on children in care, since they may provide different perspectives from their carers, practitioners and policy makers who have often been consulted on in research on behalf of children and young people (Holland, 2009). To this end, two group interviews (3 young people in each) and nine individual interviews with another 6 young people (aged 13-19 years) have been carried out thus far, with data collection ongoing for the next two months. At present, all the young people who took part are currently looked-after by the local authority in foster care placements, or have just recently left care and therefore are considered a Care Leaver. The interview agenda was based on a few broad questions around PE, school and extra-curricular activities with further probing questions which sought to identity their experience in relation to any benefits, barriers and challenges to participating in PESS. The qualitative responses from all surveys and interviews have been collated and are in a process of being analysed thematically to draw out common responses and areas of interest; facilitating the identification of key themes and sub-themes. Survey data from teachers is still being collected and so it should be noted that this paper draws specifically upon the findings generated from the online survey of VSHs, telephone interviews with VSHs and young people interviews.

Expected Outcomes

As noted, this paper presents early findings from an ongoing doctoral project. Preliminary findings from the professional perspective suggests that taking part in PESS is perceived to elicit a number of potential benefits for looked-after children. These include enhancing their social/emotional well-being, encouraging positive relationships and contributing to their personal development; all of which are known within literature as important for looked-after children to thrive (Gilligan, 1999; Daniel and Wassell, 2002). Over two thirds of professionals who took part in the survey agreed that there are barriers and/or challenges that affect looked-after children’s experiences of PESS. Young people’s ‘pre-care’ experience was identified as a contributing factor due to a lack of opportunity or positive role models when residing in their birth families. Logistical issues were also frequently mentioned which included young people moving care placements, local authority’s priority and indeed accountability for PE and school sport, and the differentiated allocation of government funding. Although at an early stage of analysis, the data from the young people appears to also suggest that pre-care experience is largely influential in contributing to their PESS experience, and the supportiveness of those around them is imperative. In contrast to the professionals, young people reflected on experiences and issues in regards to their overall school experience such as behaviour, which subsequently impacted upon their PESS experience. This paper seeks to provide a comparison between the two sub-groups, and asks whether professional perspectives are an authentic representation of what looked-after children experience in PESS. Since little is known on this topic in the UK, and indeed on an international scale, the findings could prove significant in order to contribute to an under-researched area that may affect future educational policy and practice for many countries whose looked-after children population find themselves experiencing similar trajectories.

References

Amadeo, C. and Marshall. P (2013). Low educational attainment in England: an audit. In P.Marshall, (Ed.) The Tail: How England’s schools fail one in five – and what can be done. London: Profile Books Ltd. Armour, K., Sandford, R. and Duncombe, R. (2011). Right to be active: looked-after children in physical education and sport. In K. Armour (Ed) Sport Pedagogy: An Introduction for Teaching and Coaching. London: Pearson Education Limited. Bailey, R. (2007). Evaluating the relationship between physical education, sport and social inclusion, Educational Review, 57 (1), 71-90. Broad, B. and Monaghan, M. (2003). Talking Sense: Messages from young people facing social exclusion about their health and well-being. London: The Children’s Society. Daniel, B. and Wassell, S. (2002a). The School Years: Assessing and Promoting Resilience in Vulnerable Children 2. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers. Farineau, H. and McWey, L. (2011). The relationship between extracurricular activities and delinquency of adolescents in foster care, Children and Youth Services Review, 33, 963-968. Gilligan R. (1999). Enhancing the resilience of children and young people in public care by mentoring their talents and interests. Child and Family Social Work, 4, 187-196. Holland, S. (2009). Listening to Children in Care: A Review of Methodological and Theoretical Approaches to Understanding Looked-After Children’s Perspectives, Children and Society, 23, 226-235. Jackson, S., Cameron, C., Hollingworth, K. and Hauri, H. (2011). England. In S. Jackson and C. Cameron (Eds.) Final Report of the YiPPEE Project: Young People from a Public Care Background: Pathways to Further and Higher Education in Five European Counties. London: Thomas Coram Research Unit, Institute of Education, University of London. Lerner, R.M., et al. (2005). Positive Youth Development, Participation in Community Youth Development Programs, and Community Contributions of Fifth-Grade Adolescents: Findings from the First Wave Of the 4-H Study of Positive Youth Development, The Journal of Early Adolescence, 25, 17. McLeroy K, Bibeau R, Steckler D et al. (1988). An ecological perspective on health promotion programs. Health Education Quarterly. 15, 351-377. Quarmby, T. (2014). Sport and physical activity in the lives of looked-after children, Sport, Education and Society. Safvenbom, R. and Samdahl, D. (2000). Leisure for youth in residential care: an important context for intervention, International Journal of Social Welfare, 9, 120-127. Sempik, J., Ward, H. and Darker, I. (2008). Emotional and behavioural difficulties of children and young people at entry into care, Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 13 (2), 221-233.

Author Information

Chloe Woodhouse (presenting / submitting)
Loughborough University
School of Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences
Cardiff
Loughborough University
Loughborough

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.