Exploring the Evolving Concept of Children and Childhood in Ireland (1900-1940) from an Historical Educational Policy Perspective
Author(s):
Thomas Walsh (presenting / submitting)
Conference:
ECER 2017
Format:
Paper

Session Information

Paper Session

Time:
2017-08-24
17:15-18:45
Room:
K3.12
Chair:
Iveta Kestere

Contribution

Concepts of children and childhood are time-specific and linked to contextual issues such as social, economic, religious, cultural and political factors (James and Prout, 1997; Montgomery, 2009). The period from 1900 through to 1940 in Ireland witnessed a radical change in the conceptualisation of children and childhood as elucidated in the primary school curriculum and associated educational literature emanating from the era.

 

This presentation traces the evolution of the conceptualisation of childhood in Ireland from an educational perspective, particularly through curriculum documents, in the opening decades of the twentieth century. This is a valuable lens owing to the centrality of education in the lives of all children during this period and its use by churches and State for assimilation, socialisation and politicisation purposes. First, it examines the concept of childhood inherent in the Revised Programme of Instruction (1900). Ireland’s status as a colony of the British Empire resulted in the Revised Programme of Instruction (1900) being informed by international developments such as the New Education Movement (Selleck, 1968) and by progressive educationalists such as Pestalozzi, Froebel and Rousseau (Dickson et al., 2012). It stressed the agency of the child in the educational process and placed a strong emphasis on the development of reasoning and other critical skills. However, many elements of the ‘borrowed policy’ around the conceptualisation of childhood failed to gain traction in practice in schools in Ireland and were not introduced as envisaged by the policymakers.

 

This international influence was much reduced following Independence as Ireland entered a period of isolation and insularity vis-à-vis global developments. From 1922, the construction of childhood was primarily influenced by the heightened sense of cultural nationalism and the doctrines and ideology of the Catholic Church. The influence of the Vatican was apparent in terms of the Catholic social teaching and social doctrine through encyclicals such as Rerum Novarum (1891)and Quadragesimo Anno (1931). This dual nationalist and Catholic social doctrine envisaged a subordinate position for children in society, an emphasis on strict socialisation and ‘moulding’ into perfection, a passive role for children in the educational process and the need for adherence to rules and regulations. In reality, this conceptualisation resonated more with teachers and parents in Irish society than its predecessor.

 

The key research questions that this presentation sets out to answer are:

  • What conceptualisation of children and childhood was inherent in the two curricula introduced in Ireland between 1900 and 1940?
  • What were the key national and international influences that informed these conceptualisations?
  • What was the effect of these conceptualisations on the educational experiences of children from this era?
  • What residual legacies from this period still impact on the education system 100 years later?

The research is situated within a theoretical frame pertaining to the characterisation of conceptualisations of children and childhood advanced by Jenks (1996). This categorises such conceptualisations into two distinct codes - The Apollonian child and the Dionysian child. The Apollonian child was characterised by a focus on innocence and on the inherent goodness of the child, which was to be celebrated and elicited through discovery learning and sensory interactions. This view was inherent within the philosophy of the 1900 curriculum. The Dionysian view of the child was predicated on the stain of Adamic Original Sin that was inherent in the Christian worldview. This required a closed, defined curriculum for the child’s formation to be delivered through didactic methodologies to ensure that knowledge was conveyed and assimilated. From 1922, the new programme placed a greater focus on suppressing natural instincts and moulding the child in order to overcome his/her human frailties. 

Method

The data upon which this presentation is based were generated through critical document analysis undertaken on educational documents and sources emanating from the period 1900 to 1940. As defined by Bowen (2009:27): Document analysis is a systematic procedure for reviewing or evaluating documents—both printed and electronic (computer-based and Internet-transmitted) material. Like other analytical methods in qualitative research, document analysis requires that data be examined and interpreted in order to elicit meaning, gain understanding, and develop empirical knowledge. Document analysis is used to frame the wider context in which changes to the conceptualisation of childhood become apparent in the period under review. Complementing document analysis, narrative policy analysis (Roe, 1994) is employed to construct a metanarrative of the evolving conceptualisations of childhood in the era. The main emphasis is on the examination of primary source documents, most particularly the Revised Programme of Instruction (1900) and the two curricula developed and introduced in the 1920s (1922 and 1926). Further primary and secondary source materials are used in order to contextualise and triangulate data relating to conceptualisations of childhood, including government reports and publications, official parliament records, ecclesiastical documents, legislation, memoirs and biographies. These are drawn both from periods of British government rule and Irish government rule and were sourced largely in the National Library of Ireland and in the National Archives. This approach brought many advantages considering the historical nature of the research but the author also remains cognisant of the limitations of document analysis (Bowen, 2009). Care was taken to ensure that a distinction was made between deliberate and inadvertent sources (Duffy, 2005; Scott, 1990). Each document was examined for its authenticity, credibility, representativeness and meaning (Scott, 1990; Denscombe, 2005).

Expected Outcomes

This research into the conceptualisation of childhood in Ireland between 1900 and 1940 is timely as the centenary of Independence approaches. The conceptualisation as encapsulated in the curricula from the era is particular for its radical change in such a short period of time, catalysed primarily by wider societal issues. Lessons can be learned from instances where pedagogical concerns became subservient to national or religious interests to the detriment of the educational experience and outcome for the child. Another finding is the enduring legacy that a policy change can have upon an education system in subsequent decades. The concept of the child as encapsulated in the curriculum of the 1920s remained unchanged and unchallenged until the 1970s in Ireland, despite many wider societal changes. The 1970s witnessed a return to the child-centred philosophy of the 1900 curriculum, yet evidence indicates that the education system was slow to introduce this policy in practice. Indeed, tensions still remain within our contemporary conceptualisation of childhood at a societal and practice level between the Apollonian and Dionysian codes as developed by Jenks (1996). Excavating the historical origins of this tension is very valuable in order to understand the current situation and future orientations. The research also highlights the importance of societal context in the framing of education policy and the necessity to maintain the needs, interests and abilities of children at the heart of policy development.

References

Akenson, D. (1975). A Mirror to Kathleen’s Face – Education in Independent Ireland 1922-1960. London: McGill-Queen’s University Press. Bowen, G. (2009). Document Analysis as a Qualitative Research Method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9, 2, pp. 27–40. Coolahan, J. (1981). Irish Education - History and Structure. Dublin: Institute of Public Administration. Denscombe, M. (2005). The Good Research Guide. England: Open University Press. Devine, D. (1999). Children: Rights and Status in Education – A Socio-Historical Analysis. Irish Educational Studies, 18, pp. 14-28. Dickson, D., Pyz, J. and Shepard, C. (Eds.) (2012). Irish classrooms and British Empire Imperial Contexts in the Origins of Modern Education. Dublin: Four Courts Press. Duffy, B. (2005). The Analysis of Documentary Evidence (in) Bell, J. (2005). Doing Your Research Project- A Guide for First-time Researchers in Education, Health and Social Science. England: Open University Press. Duschinsky, R. (2013). Augustine, Rousseau, and the Idea of Childhood. The Heythrop Journal, LIV, pp. 77-88. Greene, S. and Moane, G. (2000). Growing up Irish – Changing Children in a Changing Society. Irish Journal of Psychology, 21, 3-4, pp. 122-137. Kiely, G., O’Donnell, A., Kennedy, P. and Quin, S. (Eds.) (1999). Irish Social Policy in Context. Dublin: University College Dublin Press. James, A. and Prout, A. (1997) (Eds.). Constructing and Reconstructing Childhood: Contemporary Issues in the Sociological Study of Childhood. Oxon: Routledge Education Classic Editions. Jenks, C. (1996). Childhood: Key Ideas. London: Routledge. Montgomery, H. (2009). An Introduction to Childhood: Anthropological Perspectives on Children’s Lives. UK: Wiley-Blackwell. National Programme Conference (1922). National Programme of Primary Instruction. Dublin: The Educational Company of Ireland. National Programme Conference (1926). Report and Programme presented by the National Programme Conference to the Minister for Education. Dublin: The Stationery Office. O’Connor, M. (2010). The Development of Infant Education in Ireland, 1838-1948. Bern: Peter Lang International Academic Publishers. Roe, E. (1994). Narrative Policy Analysis: Theory and Practice. Durham: Duke University Press. Schnell, R. (1978). Integrating Concepts of Childhood and the History of Education. Irish Journal of Education, 12, 1, pp. 51-68. Scott, J. (1990). A Matter of Record. Cambridge: Polity Press. Selleck, R. (1968). The New Education – The English Background 1870-1914. Melbourne: Sir Isaac Pitman and Sons Ltd. Walsh, T. 2007. The Revised Programme of Instruction, 1900–1922. Irish Educational Studies, 26, 2, pp. 127-143. Walsh, T. (2012). Primary Education in Ireland, 1897-1990: Curriculum and Context. Bern: Peter Lang International Academic Publishers.

Author Information

Thomas Walsh (presenting / submitting)
Maynooth University
Education
Maynooth

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.