How Is Health Understood And Taught In Physical Education - A Literature Review Of Existing Literature
Author(s):
Hanne Mong (presenting / submitting) Øyvind F. Standal
Conference:
ECER 2017
Format:
Paper

Session Information

18 SES 11 JS, Perspectives on Physical Activity and Learning

Joint Paper Session with NW 08 and NW 18

Time:
2017-08-24
17:15-18:45
Room:
K3.23
Chair:
Rachel Sandford

Contribution

This presentation is a part of an ongoing PhD-project which aims to develop knowledge on teaching about health in physical education through action research. In the field of physical education there is a discussion concerning the impact of the teaching about health in the subject (O´Sullivan, 2004) and whether health promotion is an appropriate way to legitimate physical education (Trost, 2004; Kirk, 2006). According to earlier research on teaching about health in physical education, there are different perspectives that are advanced. First, the biomedical perspective on health seems to have a great impact on what is being taught about health in physical education. This perspective emphasizes the importance of physical activity and nutrition in order to develop good health. Second, this biomedical perspective has been criticized for providing a narrow understanding of health. Thus, in a critical perspective, the emphasis seems to be how the biomedical discourse objectify the body and how this discourse reproduce a global and narrow understanding of health and the body. The challenge of the critical perspective is that it don´t bring any new knowledge into the debate, it is all critique. Third, also starting with a critique of the biomedical perspective, a salutogenetic perspective has been advanced. This perspective take a step back from the one-sided pathogenic view of health, and rather focuses on the fact that everyone can develop their own health. Health is described as the resources and potential all human have to develop their own health. In this perspective health is not something you have/not have, we are all in some way healthy (Quennerstedt, 2008). Finally, a fourth perspective is the hermeneutic, which look at health as something enigmatic. Health is not a condition, but it is inherent in all human, we cannot see it or feel it. In this perspective health is also described as a relational component, a condition of being involved in the world. To be involved with other human beings, we will experience and develop health (Gadamer, 1993). This perspective is to our knowledge not applied in physical education research.

 

There is reason to believe that these different perspectives will have different pedagogical implications on how health in physical education is taught. Therefore, the objective of this paper is to review the existing literature on health education in physical education in order to investigate how health is understood and taught in physical education. More specifically we ask; How is health understood and taught in physical education?

Method

In order to identify the empirical work on teaching health in physical education we are currently (January 2017) conducting a literature review. The databases SportDiscus, ERIC and ISI Web of science are being searched using the keywords physical education in combination with health, education, research and model-based practice. Only literature in English and the Scandinavian languages will be included in the study. From the initial search articles with a non-relevant topic will be excluded and reference lists of included material will be hand-searched. The aim of these searches is not to make a meta-analysis, but a systematic review focusing on the narratives communicated through the articles.

Expected Outcomes

Our initial analysis suggest that the articles we find can be separated into two groups. The first are articles that describe different types of instructional, curricular or pedagogical models that are used to teach health in physical education. The second group of articles are studies employing intervention research (ranging from RCT to action research) in order to improve physical education. An important distinction in this groups is between articles that use physical education as a site for promoting health and those that seek to improve the students’ learning about health. Through our on-going work, we expect to be able to provide a more nuanced analyzes of how health is understood in different studies as well as what kind of pedagogical efforts the different articles suggest.

References

Gadamer, H-G (1996) The enigma of health, Standford University Press, California. Trost, S. (2004) School physical education in the post-report era: An analysis from public health, Journal of teaching in physical education O´Sullivan, M. (2004) Possibilities and pitfalls of a public health agenda for physical education, Journal of teaching in physical education, 23(4), 392-404. Quennerstedt, M. (2008) Exploring the relation between physical activity and health – a salutogenic approach to physical education, Sport, Education and society, 13:3, 267 -283.

Author Information

Hanne Mong (presenting / submitting)
Norwegian school of sport science
Physical education and pedagogy
Oslo
Oslo and Akershus university college of applied sciences

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.