Attention! School Bus
Author(s):
Zeynep Temiz (submitting) Simge Yılmaz (presenting)
Conference:
ECER 2017
Format:
Poster

Session Information

ERG SES D 02, Interactive Poster Session

Poster Session

Time:
2017-08-21
13:30-15:00
Room:
W3.11
Chair:
Agnieszka Bates

Contribution

Children behavior could be observed in various contexts including but not limited in home, school, and neighborhood where they spend their everyday lives. In this sense, children behavior and social interaction are dependent in the context that involve children’s array of relationships and activities within a particular setting. Studies investigating children’s behavior shift their focus from structured and monitored environments to less structured and less monitored environments (Galliger, Tisak, & Tisak, 2009). From this perspective, school buses offer a scarcely studied context in which various social interactions took place. The school bus have rather different context than  home and school as it is an unstructured and non-monitored very confined space (Galliger, Tisak, & Tisak, 2009).

 

Student transportation  started with horse drawn carriage in 19th century. Then trucks were redesigned as school bus. First vehicles, those were designed for a specific purpose to transport school children, manufactured in 1920 and 1930.   In 1936 national school bus standards were issued in US and all school buses were required to be yellow by law in order to be distinguished by all drivers in nationwide (Akyüz, Bailey-Torres & Bomba-Edgerton, 2011). Currently several standards were determined for young children’s transportation. For instance, school bus drivers have regular duties such as; operating the school bus safely and supervising the safety of all young passengers. In addition to these regular duties, the drivers should also have general knowledge about the development of young children, the age-appropriate physical handling, communication and behavior management of them  (NSTA, 2010). Drivers’ burden is greater than people’s expectation as they are the first person that children first encounter in the morning and also the last person with whom children interact during  school time (Dawson & Sanders, 1997).

 

National Highway Transportation Safety Administration (2017) reported that 450,000 public school buses transport 23.5 million children to and from school and school-related activities in United States every year. When we think about educational system school bus drivers are the least likely stakeholders to be remembered. It is imperative that more attention should be given into training and controlling of staff assigned in school buses (Akyüz, Bailey-Torres & Bomba-Edgerton, 2011).

 

School bus drivers were not given enough recognition as professionals in education system. Thus they did not receive any training about child development or communicating with children.  It is important to offer in-service training to school bus drivers, as they have the ultimate responsibility in their hands. Schools should continually monitor their school bus drivers and look for ways to promote safety, atmosphere and communication in school buses for the most comfortable and safest transportation possible for our nation’s children. Research on the pre-school children transportation to school to date has hardly been definitive in Turkey. As such, this study equipped with the purpose of investigating pre-school education school buses condition. More precisely, this study seeks to answer following questions:

1)     How safety is maintained in pre-school education buses?

2)     How is the physical and social atmosphere of pre-school buses? 

3)     How do pre-school education bus drivers communicate with children? 

Method

Qualitative research design guided the present study. Data was collected by using pre-determined observation protocols and analyzed by content analysis method. Before carrying out the research, official permission was obtained from the Ministry of National Education (MONE) of Turkish Republic. Researchers’ initial intention was to make a video record in school buses; however, MONE did not allow researcher to take video record in school buses due to children’s potential vulnerability. Researcher only got permission to take note in buses. After obtaining official permission from MONE, the researcher asked for collaboration to Union of Transportation in Van-Turkey where twelve pre-school buses were officially registered. Researchers got those twelve buses drivers’ communication information. Six pre-service senior pre-school education teachers had short interview with school bus drivers. Then they took four rides with children school to home two times in bus and make an observation in the bus. Each ride lasted approximately 50 minutes to 85 minutes including get in and get off times. Senior pre-service teachers did not leave buses until the last child delivered to home. Researcher determined three themes investigating related literature which are; safety, atmosphere and communication with drivers. Pre-service teachers’ observations were based on these themes. Safety theme categories are: Traffic rules, seat belt, speed, front seat, talking with phone, helping children get in-get off, delivering children to parents, host-hostes. Atmosphere themes categories are: Hygiene, Music, Number of Children, relationship among children. Communication with drivers categories are: greeting, instruction, conversation topic, inappropriate language. Content analysis approach was utilized to analyze data, as it typically focuses on written documents or transcription of recorded verbal communications (Berg, 2007). Fair copies of observation notes were prepared by pre-service teachers before the data analysis procedure. Based on pre-determined themes and categories data were coded by researcher and one of senior pre-service teachers independently to establish inter-coder reliability. Percentage agreement among the two coders was measured by utilizing Holsti’s (1969) Formula in which “PA stands for percentage agreement. A is the number of agreements between two coders, and nA and nB are the number of units coded by coders A and B, respectively: PA= 2A (nA+nB) This measure ranges from .00 (no agreement) to 1.00 (perfect agreement)” (Neuendorf, 2002, p.149). Two coders reached perfect inter- rater reliability. Then the meaning of study is illustrated.

Expected Outcomes

Safety Three safety rules were broken in this study; unfastened seat belts, usage of front seat, and using mobile phones while driving school bus. Although MONE legislation clearly states that there should be seat belt for all children in school buses, and they should be fastened during taxi, none of the children obeyed this rule and none of the drivers checked children’s seat belts. Furthermore, seven of the drivers did not fasten their seat belt too. As well as unfastened seat belts, letting children to have a seat on front seat is against the traffic rules, however two of the drivers acted against the rule and let two children to have seat on front. Drivers are required to have a cell phone to reach parents, school administration and Union of Transportation when it is needed by MONE legislation. Yet, it is illegal to use a phone while driving. All the drivers made both business and private call while operating the school bus in traffic. Atmosphere General social atmosphere of busses were positive. There was not any conflict emerge between children. It is not crowded and number of children ranges from 10-15. Any behavior disorder was not observed during bus ride. Yet, physical atmosphere was not pleasing as much as social atmosphere. Dirt and dust covered the bus inside also it is airless and smelly. MONE required all drivers to keep musical system off while driving. Yet, all of the buses turn music on. They generally play arabesque music which is not appropriate for young children. Communication with Drivers Both children and drivers were eager to talk with each other. Children generally told drivers what they did in school and drivers respond them in an appropriate language. Drivers only use inappropriate language when they make private call in bus.

References

Akyüz, Ü., Bailey-Torres, R., & Bomba-Edgerton, K. (2011). Üç farklı düzeyde okul bölgesinin ulaşım yönetiminin karşılaştırılması [Comparison Of Transportation Method Of School District At Three Different Levels]. Milli Eğitim, 189, 21-42. Berg, B. L., (2007). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences (6th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon. Dawson, J., & Sanders, D. (1997). A Bus Program That Really Works!. Principal, 76(3), 38-39. Galliger, C. C., Tisak, M. S., & Tisak, J. (2009). When the wheels on the bus go round: Social interactions on the school bus. Social Psychology of Education, 12(1), 43-62. Holsti, O. (1969). Content analysis for the social sciences and humanities. Don Mills: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company. Ministry of National Education (2007). Okul servis araçları hizmet yönetmeliği [School Buses’ Operational Legislation]. Retrieved from http://mevzuat.meb.gov.tr/html/26627_0.html National Highway Transportation Safety Administration. (2007). School bus safety. Retrieved from https://www.nhtsa.gov/road-safety/school-buses. National School Transportation Association. (2010). National School Transportation Specifications & Procedures. Retrived from http://www.nasdpts.org/ncstonline/Documents/NST2010Pubwithlinks_000.pdf Neuendorf, K. A. (2002). The content analysis guidebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. Ramage, R., & Howley, A. (2005). Parents' Perceptions of the Rural School Bus Ride. Rural Educator, 27(1), 15-20. Spence, B. (2000). Long school bus rides: Their effect on school budgets, family life, and student achievement. Charleston, WV: AEL.

Author Information

Zeynep Temiz (submitting)
yuzuncu yil university
elementary education
Van
Simge Yılmaz (presenting)
mersin university, Turkey

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.