International Education: Stakeholders’ Perspectives
Author(s):
Burcu Toptas (presenting / submitting) İnayet Aydın
Conference:
ECER 2017
Format:
Paper

Session Information

ERG SES H 06, Internationalism and Education

Paper Session

Time:
2017-08-22
11:00-12:30
Room:
W3.16
Chair:
Erich Svecnik

Contribution

As a result of globalization, the level of different cultures’ interaction with each other is rising and this situation encourages people to work in far countries in the direction of various purposes (earning money, knowing other cultures etc.) Because of rapid changes in international trade, expatriate workers need schools giving international level of education for their children (Keller, 2015). They want their children get an education compatible with their own country thusly (Hayden and Thompson, 2008). However, it is a tremendous mistake to think that international schools are for only expatriate workers’ children (Keller, 2014). Thus, some local people want their children to be educated in schools where they gain international perspective. According to Merey and Alkan (2017), international schools are quite crucial to cope with new challenges as a result of globalization, to raise successful individuals having intercultural sensitiveness, and communicational sufficiency and to create global identity. Furthermore, breaking down the prejudices and targeting world peace are some purposes of international education, as well (Hayden and Thompson, 2008).

It can be stated that international schools enable interactions of different cultures. In these schools with multicultural structure, different education applications must be performed more than other schools. It is observed that some of the parents, teachers, and administrators have different cultural inheritance from dominant culture as a matter of fact. Because of that the psychodynamic and emotional structure, every individual and group bring to the school is needed to understand (Caffyn, 2011).

Understanding the views and expectations of the stakeholders in international schools is very important. Thus, while some of the stakeholders focus on the pragmatic aspect of international schools, the others can be interested in the idealistic aspect of it. In these schools, a balanced approach should be adopted to both protect the cultural legacy and enable to think internationally (Keller, 2014). To adopt this approach is mostly the responsibility of school administrators. School administrators must provide an efficient communications between stakeholders, and be sure that education program run smoothly, and effectively. They must be supportive about the stakeholders adopt multi-cultural structure. Some of the administrators of international schools cannot handle the complexities, according to Benson (2011) they mostly leave their job in a short time. According to the writer, the location of the school stands causes the administrators quit their job as well. Besides, international schools causes a lot of new problems (e.g. interventions to sexual orientation) for a person leaving his/her country and teaching in a new country (Hayden and Thompson, 2011). Moreover, educator parents or other parents prefer international schools with different expectations.

In Turkey it is observed that schools having International Baccalaruate (IB) programs measure up to international school status. On the other hand, all curriculum needing approval, including IB programmes, and teachers’ documentation being checked by the Ministry of Education. According to Halıcıoğlu (2008) IB schools in Turkey come up against some cultural, educational and psychological difficulties. Because IB programs and Turkish education program aren’t similar, and have different requirements. As for teachers confront some problems between their teaching philosophy and experience within Turkish education system.

This study aims to identify the educational problems encountered by stakeholders. Additionally, it is also aimed to determine their solutions for the problems they are experiencing. In accordance with the primary research aims, following questions will be answered:

  1. What are stakeholders' (parents, teachers, administrators) opinions about education program at the schools?
  2. What are the problems (educational, cultural, communicational etc.) facing stakeholders within the process of education?
  3. What are the suggestions of stakeholders’ about the problems which they are facing?

Method

This study was designed as a phenomenological design since it is aimed to identify the international schools stakeholders’ perspective regarding the problems faced in the education process (Creswell, 2007). Phenomenological design was preferred because of that the structure and core of the phenomenon is trying to be understood (Meriam, 2015). Sample of this study consists five administrators, five teachers and five parents from international schools in Ankara. Employing criterion sampling, it will be ensured that the stakeholders have at least three years experience at the international schools in Turkey. According to the maximum variation sampling (Patton, 2014) it will be tried to reach stakeholders from different schools/cultures. In addition to this, it will be ensured that stakeholders are local and also expatriate. The data will be collected through semi-structured interview form which has been developed by the researchers. Interview form includes both demographical and open ended questions. In favor of enabling content validity, both expert opinion has been received and pilot interviews has been made. Through the corrections and suggestions received from the experts, the interview form has been finalized. The data will be analyzed through content analysis method by transcribing verbatim. The analysis will be executed through NVivo11 program since the data can be interpreted systematically. In addition to the interviews, the curriculum of the schools will also be analyzed, so international connections will be evaluated in this direction.

Expected Outcomes

In the direction of this study, it is aimed to identify perspectives of stakeholders (administrator, teacher, parent) at international schools in Turkey. It is planned to gather problems and suggestions of local and expatriate stakeholders in detail. Findings obtained will be evaluated in the light of the studies in the literature and presented as themes. Besides, findings will be compared with the studies from different countries about international schools. Finally suggestions will be presented in order that cultural differences can be managed towards participants’ perspectives. Therefore the study can have implications for acquiring international mindedness in Turkey.

References

Benson, J. (2011). An investigation of chief administrator turnover in international schools. Journal of Research in International Education, 10(1), 87-103. Caffyn, R. (2011). International schools and micropolitics: fear, vulnerability, and identity in fragmented space. In Bates, R. (Eds.) Schooling internationally: globalisation, internationalisation, and the future for international schools (p. 59-82). New York: Routledge. Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. CA: Sage Publications. Halıcıoğlu, M. (2008). The IB Diploma programme in national schools: The case of Turkey. Journal of Research in International Education, 7(2), 164-183. Hayden, M., and Thompson, J. (2008). International school: growth and influence. Retrieved from UNESCO: International Institute for Educational Planning website: http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0018/001803/180396e.pdf. Hayden, M., and Thompson, J. (2011). Teachers for the international schools for the future. In Bates, R. (Eds.) Schooling internationally: globalisation, internationalisation, and the future for international schools (p. 83-100). New York: Routledge. Keller, D. (2014). Leadership of international schools understanding and managing dualities. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 43(6), 900-917. Keller, D. (2015). International education curriculum: Stakeholder values and perceptions. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Bilkent University. Merey, G., and Alkan, R. M. (2014). An internatıonal aspect in Turkish higher education system. The Online Journal Of Quality In Higher Education, 4(1), 9-20. Merriam, S. B. (2015). Nitel araştırma desen ve uygulama için bir rehber [Qualitative Research: A Guide to Design and Implementation] (Turan, S., Trans.). Ankara: Nobel Publications. Patton, M. Q. (2014). Nitel araştırma ve değerlendirme yöntemleri [Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods], (Bütün, M., and Demir, S., Trans.). Ankara: Pegem Academy.

Author Information

Burcu Toptas (presenting / submitting)
Ankara University
Educational Administration and Policy
Ankara
Ankara University, Turkey

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.