Developing Digital Wellbeing for Teachers and Pupils: A Design Thinking Approach
Author(s):
Fiona Chambers (presenting / submitting) Orla Murphy (presenting) Anne Jones
Conference:
ECER 2017
Format:
Paper (Copy for Joint Session)

Session Information

18 SES 12 JS, Ill-being and Well-being: Digital pedagogies and teachers' coping skills

Joint Paper Session NW 08 and NW 18

Time:
2017-08-25
09:00-10:30
Room:
K3.23
Chair:
Rachel Sandford

Contribution

The advent of digital technology has caused the socio-cultural context for learners to change with almost borderless classrooms encouraging greater learner mobility, choice and access to knowledge. Fioriani (2015) asserts that digital technologies are not mere tools but rather social forces that are increasingly affecting our self-conception (who we are), our mutual interactions (how we socialise); our conception of reality (our metaphysics); and our interactions with reality (our agency). In this new hybrid environment [real and virtual], students need to learn how to prioritise their digital wellbeing to act safely and responsibly in digital environments, manage digital stress, workload and distraction and balance digital with real-world interactions appropriately. It is clear that educators need to rethink 'pedagogy for an age of digital information and communication’ (Beetham & Sharpe, 2013, p.7) to meet the ‘pace and level of learning for each student within the styles and forms of current youth culture' (Laurillard, 2013, p. xi). This is optimised in the hands of a trained and digitally literate teacher (ibid).

 

 

Method

This qualitative study centred on one mixed secondary school in the south of Ireland. It utilised a four-stage design thinking approach (Goligorsky, 2012). Data were collected from all members of the school community: teachers, students, parents and management through a variety of design thinking techniques. Data were analysed using an inductive form of grounded theory (Charmaz, 2006).

Expected Outcomes

The study developed implemented and evaluated a digital praxis model, which fosters pupil digital wellbeing. The multi-theoretical model comprises: (a) values literacy (author & author, in press); (b) digital literacy; (c) Technological Pedagogical and Content Knowledge (Koehler & Mishra, 2005) and (d) Bloom's Digital Taxonomy.

References

Beetham, H. & Sharpe, R. (2013) (Eds). Rethinking Pedagogy for a Digital Age. 2nd edition. London: Routledge Fioriani, L. (Ed). 2015. The Online Manifesto: Being Human in a Hyperconnected Era. New York and London: Springer Open Goligorsky, D. (2012) December 8 ‘Empathy and Innovation: The IDEO Approach Lecture, Harvard Business School Boston MA. Koehler, M. J. & Mishra, P. 2005. What happens when teachers design educational technology? The development of technological pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 32(2). Laurillard, D. (2013). Foreward to the First Edition. In H. Beetham & R. Sharpe (2013) (Eds). Rethinking Pedagogy for a Digital Age. London: Routledge

Author Information

Fiona Chambers (presenting / submitting)
University College Cork, Ireland
Orla Murphy (presenting)
University College Cork, Ireland
University College Cork, Ireland

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.