Session Information
14 SES 01 B JS, Higher Education, Family Influence and Dropout
Joint Paper Session NW 14 and NW 22
Contribution
The changes at the university in Spain due to the so-called crisis have stressed the barriers and limitations for the working-class students, which in fact have always existed for entering and staying at the University. The implementation of the Bolonia process in 2010-11, on the one hand, and the raising of tuition fees as result of Real Decreto ley 14/2012 on the other hand, has created a new landscape much harder for working-class families to send and maintain their children at the University. Besides we must mention the changes in scholarships system from 2013: the decrease in the number and proportion of scholarships, and the measures that has become grants system in a competitive one. The new policies are being implemented in the last years are pointing to an increase in the individual and private funding of higher education costs and expenses for students. And before that, we must take account the growth of the private sector in Spanish Higher Education system (very important since 1990).
In this context we are going to do a qualitative approach to working-class students that remain at University. We want to analyze by their discourses if they are making changes in their strategies in any senses: choices of degrees, academic tasks, obtaining grants, paying tuition fees, work, living condition, etc., as a way of adapting to the radical changes of the new university institutional rules.
In this paper we are focusing in processes of choices: styles of choices (contingent, local choices, risk avoiding), sense of entitlement, and how the dependence on academic achievement in working class students is being reinforced with the last political measures at university.
Method
Expected Outcomes
References
ALONSO, L. E. (1998) La mirada cualitativa, Ed. Fundamentos, Madrid BOURDIEU, P. (1988): La distinción. Crítica social del juicio, Madrid, Taurus. IBÁÑEZ, J. (1979) Más allá de la sociología. El grupo de discusión: teoría y crítica, Ed. Siglo XXI, Madrid. LANGA ROSADO, D. (2005a): Los estudiantes y sus razones prácticas. Heterogeneidad de estrategias de estudiantes universitarios según clase social, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Servicio de Publicaciones. LANGA ROSADO, D. (2005b):”La dedicación académica de los estudiantes universitarios: una propuesta de carácter comprensivo”, en Témpora, 8, 159-187. LANGA ROSADO, D. (2005c): “La “juventud” de los universitarios construida desde distintas posiciones de clase. Nuevas manifestaciones de las desigualdades en el campo educativo, en Revista Española de Sociología, 5, 71-89. LANGA ROSADO, D. y DAVID, M. (2006), “A massive university or a university for the masses’: Continuity and Change in Higher Education in Spain and England”, en Journal of Education Policy, 21, nº 3, 343-365. LANGA, D. y RÍOS, M. (2013): “Los estudiantes de clases populares en la universidad y frente a la universidad de la crisis: persistencia y nuevas condiciones para la multiplicación de la desigualdad de oportunidades educativas”, en Tempora, 16, 71-96. ORTÍ, A. (1986) “La apertura y el enfoque cualitativo o estructural: la entrevista abierta semidirectiva y la discusión de grupo” en García Ferrando, Ibáñez y Alvira (comp.) El análisis de la realidad social, Alianza Editorial, Madrid.
Search the ECER Programme
- Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
- Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
- Search for authors and in the respective field.
- For planning your conference attendance you may want to use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference
- If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.