Session Information
04 SES 17 E, Students’ Practices and Perspectives regarding Assistance in Inclusive Schools – Analyzing Spatial and Power Relations in different European Countries
Symposium
Contribution
This paper deals with the situation of students in Austrian and German inclusive schools. Since the gradual realization of the programmatic top-down process to implement ‘inclusive education’ in regular schools, multiprofessional teams (e.g. teacher, special ed teacher, guidance team) enlarged (Florian 2015) – for example by the diffuse role of the so-called ‘school assistants’ (Sharma & Salend 2016). Therefore, students’ school and classroom practice are affected by means of differentiation on staff level. While educational research mainly focuses on the role of teachers and on collaboration, the acting of students within this professionalized framework and within the spatial setting of schools stays in the dark. In order to judge, whether (para)professional roles serve as a relevant factor for the students’ learning in school, the perspective of students gains importance within research contexts. Not only are students receivers of support within educational settings, but also are they active producers of social practices within educational organizations. Hence, social action in school is interwoven with and influenced by student’s orientation on school and learning. The implicitly inscripted rules gets visible. In this paper the process of students’ agency in school – before the backdrop of (para)professional measures – is analyzed by using spatial theory. In order to reconstruct agency approaches of spatial theory by Pierre Bourdieu (1992) are consulted. Due to Bourdieu, physical space in its structure is an expression of social space, hence a materialized form of historical and powerful social confrontations. So, appropriated space is one of the sites where power is asserted – in an invisible form. In order to approach the students’ perspective on education and learning in school (and the power structures embedded within this framework, which might lead to inclusion/exclusion), the practices within appropriated spaces are to be reconstructed. For the comparison of the student’s appropriation of space within a framework of assistance in German and Austrian schools, findings of the project “Assistance from the Perspective of Students” are presented. The study has been conducted in Austrian (Linz) and German (Freiburg) schools and contains group discussions, picture-based school tours and interviews with students from primary and comprehensive schools. To analyze the field data the praxeological methodology of the “documentary method” (Bohnsack 2014) was used, in order to reconstruct the orientations which implicitly give insight into the appropriation of space within a professional outline. The presentation shows selected sequences which illustrate students’ agency.
References
Bohnsack, R. (2014). Rekonstruktive Sozialforschung. Eine Einführung in qualitative Methode (9th Ed.). Opladen u.a.: Verlag Barbara Budrich. Bourdieu, P. (2018[1992]). Social Space and the Genesis of Appropriated Physical Space. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 42(1), 106–114. Florian, L. (2015). Inclusive Pedagogy: A transformative approach to individual differences but can it help reduce educational inequalities? Scottish Educational Review 47(1), 5–14. Sharma, U. & Salend, S. J. (2016). Teaching Assistants in Inclusive Classrooms: A Systematic Analysis of the International Research. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 41 (8). 117–134.
Search the ECER Programme
- Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
- Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
- Search for authors and in the respective field.
- For planning your conference attendance you may want to use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference
- If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.