Through their collaborative practices of quantification and standardisation in large- scale comparative literacy and numeracy surveys, international organisations (IOs) are both constituting new realities and being reconstituted themselves. This presentation aims to substantiate how the dominance of global measurement regimes has had profound implications for the ways in which IOs such as the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and the World Bank interact, and for the environments these new interrelationships generate. How is one to make sense of this emerging reality? The paper will examine the interplay of large IOs in their effort to achieve the targets of the United Nations’ fourth Sustainable Development Goal (the education-focused SDG 4). It will argue that the SDGs are not a stand-alone performance measurement exercise, but are organised under the rubric of a much larger monitoring programme with its own internal logic, structure and hierarchies. It will demonstrate that SDG 4 represents a significant case of transnational governance of education, and more specifically of the infrastructures and interdependencies of IOs in the construction of education data within the SDGs. The paper aims to offer insights into the labour and infrastructure involved in the joint production of metrics. Drawing on declarations, agreements and reports as well as empirical findings from a series of interviews conducted with key actors from all the major IOs and civil society, the paper uses Bourdieusian theory to suggest that quantification has facilitated symbolic governance of the education policy field. As a result, the joint effort towards achieving the targets of SDG 4 represents the rise, and to a large degree the dominance, of the influence of the transnational field of measurement in education.

Bogdandy, A., Dann, P. and Goldmann, M. (2008) ‘Developing the Publicness of Public International Law: Towards a Legal Framework for Global Governance Activities”, German Law Journal , 9, 1375-1400 Bourdieu, P. (1977) Outline of a theory of practice, Cambridge University Press Bourdieu, P. (1986) ‘The forms of capital’, in J. G. Richardson (ed.), Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education, Westport, CT, Greenwood Press, pp. 241–58. Bourdieu, P. (1990) The Logic of Practice, Stanford, CA, Stanford University Press. Bourdieu, P. (1993) The field of cultural production, Polity Press Bourdieu, P. (2000) Pascalian Meditations, Stanford, CA, Stanford University Press Bourdieu, P. (2014) On the State: Lectures at the College de France, Cambridge, UK, Polity Press. Bourdieu P., Wacquant L. (1992) An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology, Chicago, IL, University of Chicago Press. Bowker, G. and Star, S.L. (1999) Sorting Things Out: Classification and its Consequences, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press Desrosieres, A. ( 1998) The Politics of Large Numbers: A History of Statistical Reasoning, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press