Session Information
28 SES 11 B, Selectivity in School- and University-Level Education: Sociological Explorations
Symposium
Contribution
The expansion of the neoliberal paradigm has brought with it the proliferation of individualistic and meritocratic discourses. In education, this has meant placing on students the full responsibility of their academic trajectories and results, which, in the long term, will explain their social locations (Vieira et al., 2013). As a consequence, the distribution of social positions appears as the natural distribution of abilities, skills, and talents (Furlong, 2009). In this context, educational choices and transitions play a key role in the distribution of social opportunities (Tarabini & Ingram, 2018; Tarabini, 2022). Students are supposed to make free and well-informed choices aligned with their tastes, abilities, and aspirations. Despite this rhetoric, sociological research has demonstrated how students’ choices are deeply embedded in social dynamics and particularly influenced by the structure of capitals and the working of the habitus (Ball et al., 2002). In Spain, transitions to upper secondary education are the first moment when students are separated into different tracks -academic and vocational-, with substantive differences in the supply, the curriculum, the pedagogy, and the future opportunities and prospects. Based on 68 in-depth interviews with first-year students in the academic and vocational upper secondary tracks we will explore their representation on the way tracking contributes to (re)reproduce social inequality. This will allow us to study the embeddedness of educational selectivity and inequality in individuals’ subjectivities (Nylund et al., 2017).
References
Ball, S., Maguire, M., Macrae, S. (2000). Choice, pathways and transitions post-16: new youth, new economies in the global city. Falmer Press. Furlong, A. (2009). Revisiting transitional metaphors: reproducing social inequalities under the conditions of late modernity. Journal of Education and Work, 22 (5), 343-353. Nylund, M., Rosvall, P., & Ledman, K (2017). The vocational-academic divide in neoliberal upper-secondary curricula: the Swedish case. Journal of Education Policy. 32 (6), 788-808. Tarabini, A. (2022) (Ed). Educational Transitions and Social Justice: Understanding Upper Secondary School Choices in Urban Contexts. Policy Press. Tarabini, A., Ingram, N. (2018). Educational choices, transitions and aspirations in Europe. Systemic, institutional and subjective challenges. Routledge Vieira, M. M., Pappámikail, L. &; Resende, J. (2013). Forced to deal with the future. Uncertainty and risk in vocational choices among Portuguese secondary school students. The Sociological Review, 61 (4), 745-768.
Search the ECER Programme
- Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
- Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
- Search for authors and in the respective field.
- For planning your conference attendance you may want to use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference
- If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.