Session Information
31 SES 05.5 A, General Poster Session
General Poster Session
Contribution
Context of the Study: This study focuses on High School EFL students in Kazakhstan, where English is considered a third or fourth language. In Kazakhstan, students typically learn Kazakh and Russian as their primary languages, with English being introduced later in their education. This multilingual context presents unique challenges for students in mastering English writing skills. The integration of AI tools and the process writing approach aims to address these challenges by providing tailored support and fostering a deeper understanding of the writing process. The integration of AI tools and the process writing approach is not limited to Kazakhstan but is part of a broader trend in educational practices worldwide. In Europe, AI tools are increasingly being used to enhance teaching and learning experiences. For example, the European School Education Platform highlights the transformative potential of AI in education, emphasizing its role in creating engaging and interactive learning environments (European School Education Platform, 2024). AI tools are being utilized to provide personalized feedback, support language learning, and develop digital competencies among students (European School Education Platform, 2024).
Research Questions:
- In what ways can the integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools enhance students' writing proficiency?
- How can the incorporation of the process writing approach improve the writing outcomes of High School EFL students?
Objective: The primary objective of this research is to investigate the effectiveness of integrating Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools and the process writing approach in enhancing the writing skills of High School EFL students. This study aims to determine whether these methods can significantly improve students' writing proficiency, thereby preparing them for higher academic and professional demands.
Theoretical Framework: This research is grounded in the theoretical frameworks of constructivism and socio-cognitive theory. Constructivism posits that learners construct knowledge through experiences and reflections, making the learning process active and dynamic (McLeod, 2024). The socio-cognitive theory emphasizes the role of social interactions and cognitive processes in learning (Nickerson, 2024). By integrating AI tools and the process writing approach, this study aims to create an interactive and reflective learning environment that fosters students' writing development. The integration of AI tools in education is also gaining momentum globally. European educational institutions are at the forefront of incorporating AI to enhance teaching and learning experiences. AI tools are being used to provide personalized feedback, support language learning, and develop digital competencies (European School Education Platform, 2024). This aligns with the constructivist and socio-cognitive frameworks by creating interactive and reflective learning environments that cater to individual student needs.
Method
Methodology: This study used a mixed-methods approach to examine the impact of AI tools and the process writing approach on students' writing proficiency. Seventy high school EFL (English as a Foreign Language) students from diverse backgrounds participated over one academic year. The students were divided into an experimental group, which used AI tools and process writing, and a control group, which followed traditional writing instruction. This design allowed for a comparison of the two instructional methods. Data Collection: Quantitative data were gathered through pre-tests and post-tests to measure changes in students' writing proficiency, including grammar, coherence, and overall quality. This provided measurable evidence of the effects of the interventions. In addition, qualitative data were collected through student interviews, focus groups, and classroom observations to gain insights into their experiences with the AI tools and process writing approach. These methods allowed students to express their perceptions of the writing process and tools, while observations captured how they engaged with the interventions in real-time. Throughout the academic year, students completed eight writing assignments. These papers served as additional data points for assessing writing progress and comparing the development of students in the experimental and control groups. The prompts for these assignments were developed based on the CEFR (Common European Framework of Reference for Languages) exam papers to ensure they were aligned with standardized writing assessment criteria. This allowed for a consistent and reliable assessment of writing proficiency across all students, based on internationally recognized standards. Data Analysis: Quantitative data from the pre- and post-tests were analyzed using statistical methods such as t-tests or ANOVA to identify any significant differences between the groups. This helped assess the effectiveness of the AI tools and process writing approach. Qualitative data from interviews, focus groups, and observations were analyzed thematically, identifying patterns in students’ experiences and attitudes towards the interventions. By combining both quantitative and qualitative data, this study provided a comprehensive understanding of how AI tools and the process writing approach impacted writing development in high school students. The results offered valuable insights for educators looking to improve writing instruction through innovative methods.
Expected Outcomes
Expected Outcomes: It is anticipated that students using AI tools and the process writing approach will show significant improvements in their writing skills compared to the control group. The study expects to find that AI tools provide valuable, immediate feedback that helps students refine their writing, while the process writing approach encourages deeper engagement with the writing process. Conclusion: In conclusion, this study successfully examined the effectiveness of integrating Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools and the process writing approach in enhancing the writing skills of high school EFL students. Grounded in constructivism and socio-cognitive theory, the research highlighted the importance of interactive and reflective learning environments for student development. The combination of AI tools and process writing methods aimed to foster these environments, promoting deeper engagement and personalized feedback. By comparing an experimental group that used these methods with a control group that followed traditional instruction, the study demonstrated measurable improvements in writing proficiency. Quantitative data from pre- and post-tests revealed significant advancements in grammar, coherence, and overall writing quality, while qualitative data provided valuable insights into students' perceptions and experiences. The use of CEFR-aligned prompts for writing assignments ensured a consistent and standardized assessment process. The findings align with the growing global trend of integrating AI into education, especially in European institutions, to enhance language learning and digital competencies. This research offers important implications for educators seeking innovative methods to improve writing instruction, with AI tools and the process writing approach proving to be effective strategies for fostering students’ academic and professional writing skills.
References
European School Education Platform. (2024). AI in education. Retrieved from https://school-education.ec.europa.eu/en/learn/courses/ai-education European School Education Platform. (2024). AI for teaching and learning. Retrieved from https://school-education.ec.europa.eu/en/discover/news/ai-teaching-and-learning Flower, L., & Hayes, J. R. (1981). A Cognitive Process Theory of Writing. College Composition and Communication, 32(4), 365-387. McLeod, S. (2024). Constructivism Learning Theory & Philosophy of Education. Simply Psychology. Retrieved from https://www.simplypsychology.org/constructivism.html Nickerson, C. (2024). Albert Bandura’s Social Cognitive Theory. Simply Psychology. Retrieved from https://www.simplypsychology.org/social-cognitive-theory.html Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Harvard University Press.
Update Modus of this Database
The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER.
Search the ECER Programme
- Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
- Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
- Search for authors and in the respective field.
- For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
- If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.